Science Guardian

Science Guardian incorporates New AIDS Review, Global Health Review, and Paradigm Overthrow.

Power and politics in science and health

Cool examination of hot debates

-----------------------------------------------

A site defending the values of science and good scientists who dissent in the paradigm wars of HIV/AIDS, cancer, evolution, global warming, nutrition, religious belief and other disputes over new and different ideas in science, health and economics.

We aim to expose truths buried in the literature and commonly overlooked by the media, and review novel claims without the group prejudice against modern Galileos, whistleblowers, distinguished mavericks, past or future Nobelists, or any other original and independent good minds (such as the noted scientists Peter Duesberg and Kary Mullis) who may question scripture.

-----------------------------

"It seemed so simple when one was young and new ideas were mentioned not to grow red in the face and gobble." - Logan Pearsall Smith.

More Quotations on Science and Belief
Best viewed in Firefox. Guide to blog layout is at the bottom of the home page.

Mind over matter - unto death?

December 31st, 2006


Anorexia in Brazil show power of mental disturbance to wreck health

Similar mind-body phenomenon likely helps kill in HIV∫AIDS, but gay liberation may extinguish it

Anyone who has visited Brazil might be surprised to hear that there is an anorexia epidemic in that body-worshipping country of hot flesh and vibrant samba rhythms. Half of Rio seems to spend its life at the beach, and its sensual culture, rich array of exotic foods, and sea and rain forest environment would seem to rule out the unnatural insanity of self-starvation.

But the fashion industry is taking action after Ana Carolina Reston, a 5′ 8″ beauty and model, died at age 21 weighing 80 lbs, and three other young women starved themselves to death in the last two months following the same strange ritual of self destruction, where distorted body image and fear of weight gain translates into skeletal physique and death, the victim all the while convinced that she is overweight .

In the latest incident, Beatriz Cristina Ferraz Bastos, a 23-year-old student and office worker, died on Christmas Eve, weighing just 75 pounds. On her home page at Orkut, a popular Web site for young Brazilians, she described herself as —thin—? after having been —110 pounds overweight—? as a teenager, and included before and after photographs to prove her point.

The first death, in mid-November, was that of Ana Carolina Reston, a 21-year-old model, and it was initially regarded as an aberration. At the time of her death, Ms. Reston stood 5 feet 8 inches tall but weighed just over 80 pounds and was undergoing medical treatment after having collapsed at a fashion shoot in Japan.

A few days later, though, a 21-year-old fashion student also died of anorexia. At the beginning of this month, her death was followed by that of a 23-year-old manicurist, and a full-fledged media frenzy was on, with articles and television programs speculating that Brazil—s obsession with physical beauty was getting out of hand….

At the same time, though, more than 11 million families, mostly in the impoverished northeast region of the country, benefit from a government program that pays a small monthly stipend to those who do not have enough to eat. According to the national statistical office, at least 8 percent of Brazil—s 185 million people are underweight, a vast majority because they are too poor to afford a proper diet.

All four of the deaths from anorexia, in contrast, have occurred in the state of São Paulo, the country—s most populous, prosperous and modern. It is also the center of Brazil—s booming fashion industry, which has come under pressure to take steps to protect working models and discourage ordinary girls from starving themselves in order to conform to designers— and booking agents— idea of feminine beauty.

Concern over dangerously thin models has also led to action in Spain and Italy where fashion show organizers have restricted models to a weight at or above a floor. Madrid imposed a height to weight ratio in September, and guidelines have been announced for the New York fall fashion show starting in four weeks. Working out what the rules should be is proving difficult, however.

The New York Times

January 6, 2007
Health Guidelines Suggested for Models
By Eric Wilson

The fashion industry sells modish trapeze dresses and $800 platform ankle boots. But it also sells women an ideal of beauty embodied by the models who walk the runways and appear in fashion magazines.

And since the fall, American designers have been under increasing pressure to respond to a wave of dangerously thin models who have set the aesthetic standards of global fashion.

Now the industry has decided to issue guidelines to designers, aimed at promoting healthier behavior among its highly paid clothes hangers.

The guidelines, which fall short of modeling restrictions announced in recent months by fashion show organizers in Madrid and Milan, were introduced yesterday at a meeting of the Council of Fashion Designers of America in Manhattan. But the group—s recommendations, which will be sent to designers next week in anticipation of the fall fashion shows that begin in New York on Feb. 2, seem unlikely to satisfy many critics of fashion—s embrace of ultra-thinness.

According to participants at the meeting, the recommendations are likely to include scheduling fashion-show fittings with younger models during daylight hours, rather than late at night, to help them get more sleep; urging designers to identify models with eating disorders; and introducing more nutritious backstage catering, where a diet of Champagne and cigarettes is the norm.

There are no plans to require models to achieve an objective measure of health like a height-to-weight ratio, which was imposed by Madrid in September, a move that brought much public attention to the issue. It was further highlighted by the death of Ana Carolina Reston, a 21-year-old Brazilian model, from complications of anorexia in November.

More than two-thirds of respondents to a questionnaire on Elle magazine—s Web site last month said they wished that American designers would follow the recent examples of fashion show organizers in Milan and Madrid in banning overly skinny models.

But the American designers rejected that option as unworkable.

—It is important as a fashion industry to show our interest and see what we can do because we are in a business of image,—? said Diane von Furstenberg, the president of the designers— council, the industry trade group. —But I feel like we should promote health as a part of beauty rather than setting rules.—?

The group that tackled the issue also included Anna Wintour, the influential editor of Vogue; several members of her staff; health professionals including a nutritionist, a psychiatrist and a physical trainer; a representative of a modeling agency; and a producer of fashion shows.

Designers and fashion magazine editors, who hire models, and executives for agencies that represent the young women, are skeptical that the profession can be regulated or monitored.

—It—s nothing that we don—t do already,—? said David Bonnouvrier, the chief executive of DNA Model Management, speaking of the guidelines. His colleague Louis Chabat, an agent at DNA, attended the fashion council meeting yesterday.

—I hope it will be successful,—? Mr. Bonnouvrier said. —It is a serious enough issue that people will pay attention, but we cannot dictate the designers— choices. There will be a conscious effort for a while to address this, but whether that will last is another issue.—?

Madrid—s banning of models who have a body mass index less than 18, a normal body standard according to the guidelines of the World Health Organization, did not initially draw much support among the organizers of shows in the major fashion capitals, until last month, when the Italian group issued what it described as a manifesto.

The new rules in Italy are meant to be applied at fashion shows in Rome this month, although they are not binding and in many cases not entirely understood.

The Chamber of Fashion, based in Milan, is asking that models hold a license issued by a committee of city officials and a panel of doctors, nutritionists, psychologists and other experts. But when proposing that models, who must be 16 to work there, also achieve a minimum body mass index of 18.5, the organizers added that geographical and ethnic considerations should also be considered, which industry professionals found confusing.

—Can you think of another job you would have to talk to a nutritionist, a psychology expert and a doctor to get certified?—? asked Roberta Myers, the editor of Elle. —Maybe the C.I.A.?—? Ms. Myers did not attend the American council meeting, but said she supported the idea of guidelines and educational programs because they would raise consciousness of the issue.

—I see this as a good-faith effort on all of our parts,—? she said.

Abigail Walch, Vogue—s health editor, who attended the fashion industry meeting, said the group conceived its recommendations independently of Milan and Madrid.

Vogue identified several experts to help educate models on health and fitness. They include a nutritionist, Joy Bauer; a fitness trainer, David Kirsch; and Dr. Susan Ice, a psychiatrist at the Renfrew Center in Philadelphia, which treats eating disorders.

—You cannot say one factor contributes to eating disorders or that one factor resolves them,—? Ms. Walch said. —We should have different avenues for dealing with this issue. We realize there are problems and we want to do everything possible to have resources available to these young girls.—?

Restricting models because they do not meet the specific height and weight standards of Madrid, which requires them to have a body mass index higher than 18, would not solve the problem, she said.

—We see models who are thin and getting thinner,—? said Ms. Bauer, who contributes nutrition advice to —The Today Show—? and Yahoo in addition to her Manhattan and Westchester County practices. Some models who have been referred to Ms. Bauer—s offices are genetically thin, some come seeking healthy ways to lose five pounds, and some have genuine eating disorders.

—I get this pressure,—? Ms. Bauer said. —The reality is that your entire career is somewhat based on being thin. It—s a tricky thing.—?

Ms. Bauer said a goal of the fashion industry recommendations was to encourage healthy behavior among models, but also to educate designers on how to recognize disorders. Ms. Bauer, Mr. Kirsch and Dr. Ice will appear on a panel discussion of the issue during Fashion Week in New York.

She said that the body mass index would not give a fair indication of the healthfulness of models because of their height and age.

—It—s not so much about whether they can be 18 or higher and still look fabulous,—? she said. —I—m not for mandating certain B.M.I.—s because I don—t think that is fair.—?

Patrick O—Connell, a spokesman for Ms. Wintour, said: —The feeling is that it is not realistic to dictate or impose rules on a huge fashion industry. However, we do believe raising awareness and consciousness will go the furthest toward increasing people—s sensitivities to the problem.—?

Is fear and shame fatal in HIV∫AIDS?

That such a deadly phenomenon has reached Brazil proves how powerfully the misguided mind can take over health in any culture, and suggests how likely it is that the phenomenon is central to HIV∫AIDS, where the shame and guilt some gays feel at their rejection by the mainstream, and even by their families, is often spoken of as leading to similar unconscious self-destruction, and was powerfully evoked by recent comments here. The point is not that it happens. The ability of the mind to control the body is a given. The issue is the extent to which the roots of gay death in the US from AIDS are or were in the culture.

The topic was raised recently in the Andrew Sullivan sideswipes Harpers thread by Michael Geiger, a leader of the chapter of Health Education Aids Liaison or HEAL in San Diego, who wrote:

what about the extremely toxic emotions that are concurrent with the belief that one has HIV and will sicken and die? Do you Mark, believe that emotions can be toxic, even to the point of death?

Certainly most people given the diagnosis of HIV or AIDS hold or have held on to such a belief, and those taking the drugs hold to the belief that the drugs will keep them alive, otherwise they would not be taking them.

(It is) my own, and as far as I can see, scientifically “unprovable”, belief, that belief itself plays the major defining role.

My evidence: As the overwhelming “belief” of HIV causing AIDS progressed after the 1984 Gallo’s pronouncement, so did the death rate in those who “believed” they had it or “believed” they would get it, and they certainly mostly “believed” they would die from it. As the common belief shifted in 1995 to a belief that one could “live” with HIV, this too became the reality for the masses.

Mark, Is there some reason that “belief” itself should not be strongly considered, and probably investigated, albeit currently scientifically difficult to do, as a, if not even perhaps the, leading causative factor of progression to AIDS, and should it not be a major scientific pursuit or personal investigation as well?

The problem with that time line is that the rise in death rate also reflected the arrival of immunity damaging, high dose (up to 1800 mg) daily AZT as the main prescription for a major immune deficiency disorder already owed to high (recreational) drug intake.

But “Wilyretrovirus” offered an impressive personal anecdote:

I knew a gay couple who were in absolutely normal health. When one of them was told the word “positive” by the clinician, he physically collapsed on the spot, sobbing hysterically, curling up into the fetal position. He had been fine the entire time I’d known him, but within a couple weeks after having the rattle shaken at him (the “test” “result”), he became very ill. There was nothing I could do to help him. I felt so powerless.

His lover though, was fine until he started taking AZT. Their attitudes were quite different from each other, and it showed in the time it took for them to sicken and die. The friend who collapsed died within a year, his lover would hang on for another year.

“MacDonald” added this post emphasizing the group fantasy reinforcing individual fear and recommending the early seminal paper in the Journal of Psychohistory Summer 1984, on AIDS as a cultural hysteria by the prescient Caspar Schmidt:

The positive HIV test is a shaman’s rattle, but to get past the truism that any diagnosis can produce illness, I suggest that in this case it’s the whole culture of hysteria created around HIV/AIDS that’s the rattle and we all, media, politicians, activists, risk groups, docs, general population to a greater or lesser extent the witch hunters (I prefer witch hunters to shamans, since a shaman’s function is quite different)

This view is in line with Casper Schmidt’s The Group-Fantasy Origins of AIDS

Here is Schmidt’s introdution:

I propose an alternative hypothesis for the etiology of AIDS, based on the second of these two mechanisms of contagion in man. This will posit a psychosocial origin of epidemic AIDS, which will lie on the cusp between immunology, pathology and psychology (the latter including the psychology of both individuals and groups). I will do so in twin papers meant to be read in tandem: this one, which will deal mostly with the group psychology, and a second paper for the medical press. In the medical paper, which is entitled, “The Pathogenesis of Epidemic AIDS”, I account for the “biological” end of the disorder. It will trace the physiological effects of the group-psychological factors outlined in this paper on the individual patient, with the resultant epidemic of severe, mostly masked, reactive depression in the at-risk groups, of which the immune deficiency is one facet. It will outline the pathway and the mechanism by which the cell-mediated immunity may be suppressed, and will provide an animal model for AIDS, as I discuss below.

Even if you find Schmidt’s analysis somewhat overwrought as we do - fantasy replacing fantasy, as it were - there is no denying that fear of AIDS - AFRAIDS as some label it - has to be a most powerful superstition in its own right, given the effective invisibility of the “cunning” agent at every turn (even to the scientists who warn us with such certainty of its as yet unexplained and unproven action), and its supposed ability to strike otherwise healthy victims down without warning at any point over a period of 24 years (ie double the average 12 years latency period).

In fact, when one contemplates the attributes of the Virus one has to say that it is the most fearful virus ever conceived of, though luckily for some as yet unexplained reason no threat to white heterosexuals in the USA, though deadly if you are gay or if you are black, African and living in dire poverty or starving, in which latter case you are likely to be rated as suffering from AIDS by any visiting American celebrity or medical worker who catches sight of you if you have so much as a sniffle or are undernourished.

Yet obviously the individual fantasy is fed by group fantasy on every level. Thus “MacDonald” added the witty analogy that

In fact, in an exact parallel to the modern Christian missionaries, the AIDS church has largely given up on improving its numbers at home and now chooses to concentrate on Africa for new converts.

The thread is worth reading to the end of that section, since as several wise commentators point out its boundaries are cultural rather than scientific, and extend far beyond science, perhaps even starting there. Like Schmidt they also point out that by its nature this kind of deeply rooted group fantasy will resist with hostility those who try to pop the bubble, treating them as outcasts rather than saviors.

The ruling AIDS paradox is that those most in need of enlightenment in the US may try to kill the messenger. But it also seems that with gay liberation, as gays more and more take their rightful place in society, free of prejudice and other-induced guilt and shame, they may finally free themselves of HIV∫AIDS think too.

If this is true then gay liberation may be one route to the liberation of true science in HIV∫AIDS.

UPDATE (Jan 14 Sun)

Two more Brazilian beauties die

In In the Land of Bold Beauty, a Trusted Mirror Cracks, an update for the Week in Review, Larry Rohter notes that two more women died from anorexia in the last two weeks, and speculates why Brazil’s female body image is narrowing.

The death that followed Ms. Reston—s was of a 21-year-old fashion student. There was also a 23-year-old student and office worker who had a home page on the Web and gave English lessons….

Even the famous —girl from Ipanema,—? immortalized in the bossa nova song written in 1962, illustrated the cultural differences that prevailed then: only in the English lyrics is she —tall and tan and young and lovely.—? In the original Portuguese version, the emphasis is on —the sweet swing—? of her hips and backside as she walks, a sway described as —more than a poem, the most beautiful thing I have ever seen.—?

Today, in sharp contrast, the epitome of beauty is Gisele Bündchen, the top model whose enormous international success has inspired the thousands of Brazilian girls who dream of emulating her to enroll in modeling schools and competitions. But very little about Ms. Bündchen—s body —” tall and blond, rangy yet busty —” connects her to her homeland and its traditional self-image….

According to the survey, the percentage of the population taking appetite-suppressants more than doubled between 2001 and 2005, making Brazil the world champion in the consumption of diet pills.

—The reasons are purely aesthetic, not medical, especially for women,—? who account for at least 80 percent of the market, said Dr. Elisaldo de Araújo Carlini, a professor at the Federal University of São Paulo who is the author of the study. —They want to get thin no matter what, all because of images from north of the Equator. It is a cruel cultural imposition on the Brazilian woman.—?

Women in countries around the world are subject to such pressures, of course. But Brazilians argue that the situation here is more extreme: this is, after all, a tropical country in which, much more than the United States, Europe or Japan, people live their lives outdoors, often, for comfort—s sake, in skimpy clothes showcasing the body—s glories or defects.

A result is a culture of vanity that seems to know no boundaries. This summer, the newest rage, according to local news reports, is liposuction on the toes, and there have also been accounts of a boom in plastic surgery among women 80 and older.

Men are not immune. President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva is reported to have recently had cosmetic work done on his teeth, and even the chief of an Indian tribe in the Amazon had plastic surgery because, as he guilelessly put it, —I was finding myself ugly and I wanted to be good-looking again.—?…

—This abrupt shift is a feminine decision that reflects changing roles—? as women move out of the home and into the workplace, she said. —Men are still resisting and clearly prefer the rounder, fleshier type. But women want to be free and powerful, and one way to reject submission is to adopt these international standards that have nothing to do with Brazilian society.—?

The bottom line (speaking metaphorically here) seems to be that cultural forces can take a perfectly reasonable individual response based on vanity and magnify it into a killer.

The New York Times
Printer Friendly Format Sponsored By

January 14, 2007
In the Land of Bold Beauty, a Trusted Mirror Cracks
By LARRY ROHTER

RIO DE JANEIRO

AS king of carnival, the corpulent Rei Momo is supposed to embody all the jollity, carnality and excess associated with that most Brazilian of bacchanals. So when the event—s reigning monarch has gastric bypass surgery, sheds 150 pounds and starts an exercise program, you begin to wonder what—s going on.

And when six young women die of anorexia in quick succession —” two in the last two weeks —” the wonder turns to bewilderment. Brazil may well be the most body-conscious society in the world, but that body has always been Brazil—s confident own —” not a North American or European one.

For women here that has meant having a little more flesh, distributed differently to emphasize the bottom over the top, the contours of a guitar rather than an hourglass, and most certainly not a twig. Anorexia, though long associated with wealthier industrialized countries, was an affliction all but unheard-of here.

But that was before the incursions of the Barbie aesthetic, celebrity models, satellite television and medical makeovers made it clear just how far some imported notions of beauty, desirability and health have encroached on Brazilian ideals once considered inviolate.

By — —upgrading— to international standards of beauty,—? said Mary del Priore, a historian and co-author of —The History of Private Life in Brazil,—? the country is abandoning its traditional belief that —plumpness is a sign of beauty and thinness is to be dreaded.—? The contradictory result, she added, is that —today it—s the rich in Brazil who are thin and the poor who are fat.—?

A generation ago, the ideal type here was Martha Rocha, a Miss Brazil from the mid-1950s. She finished second in the Miss Universe competition supposedly because her body was a bit too generous in the hips, buttocks and thighs, but since those characteristics were so highly valued here, as suggested by cartoons and the popularity of the semi-pornographic drawings of Carlos Zéfiro that circulated, it was the rest of the world whose taste was questioned.

Even the famous —girl from Ipanema,—? immortalized in the bossa nova song written in 1962, illustrated the cultural differences that prevailed then: only in the English lyrics is she —tall and tan and young and lovely.—? In the original Portuguese version, the emphasis is on —the sweet swing—? of her hips and backside as she walks, a sway described as —more than a poem, the most beautiful thing I have ever seen.—?

Today, in sharp contrast, the epitome of beauty is Gisele Bündchen, the top model whose enormous international success has inspired the thousands of Brazilian girls who dream of emulating her to enroll in modeling schools and competitions. But very little about Ms. Bündchen—s body —” tall and blond, rangy yet busty —” connects her to her homeland and its traditional self-image.

—Hers is a globalized beauty that has nothing to do with the Brazilian biotype,—? said Joana de Vilhena Novaes, author of —The Intolerable Weight of Ugliness: On Women and Their Bodies—? and a psychologist here. —She has very little in the way of hips, thighs or fanny. She—s a Barbie,—? one whose parents are of German descent.

Dr. Novaes and others have noted that during the 1960s and 70s, Brazilian girls played with a locally made doll named Susi, who, reflecting the national aesthetic, was darker and fleshier than her counterparts abroad. But in the 1970s, Barbie arrived, and by the mid-1980s, production of Susi dolls had ceased, though it has resumed in recent years in a sort of backlash.

Yet until recently no one here would ever have talked with admiration about having an hourglass figure like Barbie—s, let alone the coat-hanger physiques of the international runways. Instead, the ideal was what is known as —um corpo de violão,—? or —guitar-shaped body—?; that is, like Susi—s, thicker in the waist, hips and fanny.

One indication of how rapidly values are changing can be gleaned from a government study released in November, just after the first in the cluster of anorexia deaths, that of Ana Carolina Reston, a 21-year-old model. According to the survey, the percentage of the population taking appetite-suppressants more than doubled between 2001 and 2005, making Brazil the world champion in the consumption of diet pills.

—The reasons are purely aesthetic, not medical, especially for women,—? who account for at least 80 percent of the market, said Dr. Elisaldo de Araújo Carlini, a professor at the Federal University of São Paulo who is the author of the study. —They want to get thin no matter what, all because of images from north of the Equator. It is a cruel cultural imposition on the Brazilian woman.—?

Women in countries around the world are subject to such pressures, of course. But Brazilians argue that the situation here is more extreme: this is, after all, a tropical country in which, much more than the United States, Europe or Japan, people live their lives outdoors, often, for comfort—s sake, in skimpy clothes showcasing the body—s glories or defects.

A result is a culture of vanity that seems to know no boundaries. This summer, the newest rage, according to local news reports, is liposuction on the toes, and there have also been accounts of a boom in plastic surgery among women 80 and older.

Men are not immune. President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva is reported to have recently had cosmetic work done on his teeth, and even the chief of an Indian tribe in the Amazon had plastic surgery because, as he guilelessly put it, —I was finding myself ugly and I wanted to be good-looking again.—?

But most of the complaints about the tyranny of the culture of beauty here come from women. Each year follows the same pattern: Enrollment at gyms, here called —academies,—? declines as cool weather arrives and then rises in the final quarter of the year, as women try to prepare their bodies to look good on the beaches during the Southern Hemisphere summer vacation season, which runs from just before Christmas until carnival, about two months later.

But Brazilian eating habits don—t make the process easy. If the emblematic American meal consists of fried chicken, corn on the cob and apple pie, its Brazilian equivalent is more like this: rice and beans, potatoes, pasta, bread, salad and a slice of meat sprinkled with farofa, or ground and toasted yucca flour.

The Brazilian diet is much higher in carbohydrates and lower in protein than is recommended, said Claudia Carahyba, a nutritionist in São Paulo whose clients include modeling agencies that want to break their girls of such bad habits. —That is especially true of the poor,—? she said. —Since protein costs more, they trade that for more carbohydrates like yucca, which are cheaper and make you feel full.—?

In fact, the new paradigm has been slower to penetrate poorer regions like the Amazon and the northeast, where hunger is still widespread and the idea of —fartura,—? or cornucopian abundance, is especially valued. There, men in particular are proud to show off wives and children whose bodies are more rounded, as a sign that they are good providers.

—To be fat used to be considered wonderful in Brazil, because it showed that you eat very well, which is important to Brazilians,—? said Roberto da Matta, an anthropologist and newspaper columnist who is a leading social commentator. —That you have three meals a day and eat meat and beans, calmly, at a table with friends and relatives, means that someone is taking good care of you.—?

Experts also agree that Brazilian men, whatever their class or race, have been much slower to accept slenderness as a gauge of feminine beauty. When they are looking for a sexual partner, Brazilian men are consistent and clear in saying that they prefer women who are fleshy in the rear —” —popozuda—? is the wonderfully euphonious slang term used here —” and have pronounced curves.

In the past, that standard was so firmly established that some Brazilian women resorted to breast reduction or buttock augmentation surgery, sometimes even transferring their own tissue from top to bottom.

But as the international standard has taken hold, tastes are changing.

—Those huge breasts you see in the United States, like in Playboy, were always considered ridiculous in Brazil,—? said Ivo Pitanguy, the country—s most renowned plastic surgeon. —But there is now more of a tendency than before to want breasts that are a bit larger —” not to make them huge, mind you, but more proportional as part of a body that is more svelte and more athletic.—?

Though such globalized standards of beauty originated in rich, mostly white neighborhoods, they are gradually being spread to the rest of Brazil and across racial lines by the actresses and models who live here and perform in popular telenovelas. Exercise academies can be found in slum areas, and newspapers noted that the most recent anorexia victim was a dark-skinned teenager from a working-class suburb of Rio who dreamed of becoming a model.

In fact, all six women who died of anorexia lived either in Rio de Janeiro or in São Paulo, the country—s most cosmopolitan states and centers of the Brazilian fashion industry. The death that followed Ms. Reston—s was of a 21-year-old fashion student. There was also a 23-year-old student and office worker who had a home page on the Web and gave English lessons.

Ms. del Priore, the historian, pointed to other fundamental changes, which she said have led to a rebellion against machismo and the patriarchal structure that she believes persists here.

—This abrupt shift is a feminine decision that reflects changing roles—? as women move out of the home and into the workplace, she said. —Men are still resisting and clearly prefer the rounder, fleshier type. But women want to be free and powerful, and one way to reject submission is to adopt these international standards that have nothing to do with Brazilian society.—?

The New York Times

December 30, 2006
Burst of High-Profile Anorexia Deaths Unsettles Brazil
By Larry Rohter

RIO DE JANEIRO, Dec. 29 —” In less than two months, four young women have died in widely publicized cases of anorexia in Brazil, causing a national debate about body image and eating disorders.

The problem is a new one here, and it clearly puzzles and shocks Brazilians. In this country, eliminating hunger among the millions of the poor has traditionally been an important political cause, so the notion that people would voluntarily starve themselves is hard for most Brazilians to comprehend.

In the latest incident, Beatriz Cristina Ferraz Bastos, a 23-year-old student and office worker, died on Christmas Eve, weighing just 75 pounds. On her home page at Orkut, a popular Web site for young Brazilians, she described herself as —thin—? after having been —110 pounds overweight—? as a teenager, and included before and after photographs to prove her point.

The first death, in mid-November, was that of Ana Carolina Reston, a 21-year-old model, and it was initially regarded as an aberration. At the time of her death, Ms. Reston stood 5 feet 8 inches tall but weighed just over 80 pounds and was undergoing medical treatment after having collapsed at a fashion shoot in Japan.

A few days later, though, a 21-year-old fashion student also died of anorexia. At the beginning of this month, her death was followed by that of a 23-year-old manicurist, and a full-fledged media frenzy was on, with articles and television programs speculating that Brazil—s obsession with physical beauty was getting out of hand.

In the clearest sign that the issue has reached public awareness, a popular television soap opera, —Pages of Life,—? includes a character who is a teenage ballerina suffering from bulimia. In addition, a weekly newsmagazine published a cover story last month that featured a photograph of Ms. Reston alongside a headline that read, —Inside the Mind of an Anorexic.—?

At the same time, though, more than 11 million families, mostly in the impoverished northeast region of the country, benefit from a government program that pays a small monthly stipend to those who do not have enough to eat. According to the national statistical office, at least 8 percent of Brazil—s 185 million people are underweight, a vast majority because they are too poor to afford a proper diet.

All four of the deaths from anorexia, in contrast, have occurred in the state of São Paulo, the country—s most populous, prosperous and modern. It is also the center of Brazil—s booming fashion industry, which has come under pressure to take steps to protect working models and discourage ordinary girls from starving themselves in order to conform to designers— and booking agents— idea of feminine beauty.

Gisele Bündchen, a model who in recent years has been among the best known and most successful in the world, is Brazilian. Her fame and wealth are widely admired here and have prompted thousands of other young women to enroll in modeling schools and competitions, whose number has proliferated.

Last month, after Ms. Reston died, Ms. Bündchen agreed to an interview with Folha de São Paulo, a leading daily newspaper. She criticized the international obsession with thinness and urged girls who hoped to emulate her not to fall into that trap.

—Unfortunately, with the competition that exists in our milieu, a lot of girls attach more importance to work and certain notions of beauty than to their health,—? she said. —To go hungry in order to copy a certain standard is a big mistake and is not going to guarantee anyone—s success.—?

The annual São Paulo Fashion Week is scheduled to be held again late next month, and organizers have said they will require proof that all participating models are at least 16 years old and that they have supplied a health certificate. They have also announced a health and anorexia awareness campaign that includes print, broadcast and Internet announcements, the distribution of fliers and talks at schools.

Reformers who risk death saluted

December 30th, 2006


A Brazilian leader braves the shotgun death met by a nun before him

HIV∫AIDS paradigm challengers also endure psychosocial violence

Tarcisio Feitosa Da SilvaA profile in the Times today (Sat Dec 30) portrays a very brave man, Tarcísio Feitosa da Silva, director of the Roman Catholic Church’s Pastoral Land Commission in the Amazon region of Altamire, Brazil.

Tarcisio puts his life on the line in his fight against the ravages of loggers, ranchers, miners and land speculators who will cut down the entire rain forest unless they are stopped. He is now top of their hit list, following the shooting of the activist nun Sister Dorothy last year, who headed the list at the time, one of sixty politically motivated murders so far.

As bad as things are now, Mr. Feitosa fears they are about to become worse. “The war in this region hasn’t even started,” he said. “It’s only going to start when the authorities come to remove the ranchers from the lands they got through bogus means and then deforested illegally. Then it’s going to get really violent.”

Mr. Feitosa said his activities “make my wife nervous, but she understands that I can’t stop doing what I do.” The couple, who married when he was 19 and she 15, have two sons, ages 12 and 13, who are subjected to a strict curfew and have been given cellphones so that they can always be in touch with their parents.

“I watch out for myself,” he said. “I don’t walk around alone anymore, especially at night, and I don’t get into a taxi unless the driver is someone I know. Since a lot of killings have occurred in people’s homes, my father has also put barriers on all the windows and doors.”

Still, Mr. Feitosa said, “If they want to do it, they are going to do it. You can’t impede them. I have to trust in God.”

A hero of resistance to ignorance and violence, few would deny.

The AIDS dissenters are heroes of science, too, in their way

Perhaps we should take the opportunity to say that it should not be overlooked that all those who challenge the current paradigm in HIV∫AIDS face similar attacks on the psychic and economic level.

The litany of bankrupticies emotional and financial which have been visited on the best known players has not been recited in the press, but it is long, much of it secret. But some is public, perforce. The vicious attacks on Christine Maggiore as mother as well as author are well known to all who read this blog and other comment on the Web, including her own site, and are an indication of the lynch mob mentality, religious tribalism and political ruthlessness that are brought to bear on truth seekers and tellers in this arena of supposed science.

The elite scientist who first raised the obvious and overwhelming objections to HIV∫AIDS in print in a major journal, the honorable Peter Duesberg of Berkeley, paid a price for his unique display of public responsibility in the two decades since which stands as a shame to modern science - loss of the greatest accolade the NIH can confer, the Special Investigator Grant, worth $350,000 at the time, and not a penny in NIH funding since, loss of invitations to clubby conferences on holiday isles and other desirable spots, loss of graduate students, loss of teaching responsibilities, loss of domestic harmony, loss of speaking invitations, probably loss of a Nobel for his pioneering work in cancer which continues today as one of the most promising avenues of research in US science, attracting his opponents who are trying to take over the credit as fast as they can.

Celia Farber, the most distinguished literary and social critic in the field, has been visited with uninformed editorial prejudice which has limited the publication of her truly Orwellian contribution, luckily without preventing it surfacing in SPIN over the years, and Harpers in March, and her book of collected pieces from Melville House this year, “Serious Adverse Events”.

All this is the result of the protection of the paradigm by Dr Anrthony Fauci of NIAID, who has for over twenty years imposed media silence on the issue on pain of banning reporters from any contact with scientists at the NIH if they dare to cover the topic. The result of this - a policy the nattily suited Dr Fauci cheerfully posted in a AAAS newsletter - has been that even the New York Times was corraled in support of the propaganda war for unquestioning public acceptance of the paradigm, after it was thoroughly and comprehensively debunked in top journals without a satisfactory rebuttal, and has hardly mentioned Peter Duesberg since.

In other words, just like the movement to ravage the Amazon rain forest for private gain, the few who resist on behalf of the public interest are threatened with injury on the career level. Thus one vicious phenomenon seen in the struggle is the tendency of John P. Moore and other members of the goon squad putting down resistance to the paradigm to call up employers of those who raise questions, and tip them off to the crackpotism they say is being perpetrated by the employee. At least one blog has been affected by this strategy.

Then, of course, most people who try to spread sanity on the social level run into the usual handicap that this is one of the least popular topics in the media and at dinner parties, so if they do mention it they run a risk of social death. This writer last year encountered a delightful woman he had known over a decade earlier in New York City at a book party at Elaines and found out she was heading up an AIDS organization in a poor area of the city. When she learned which side we were on she said quickly “Oh dont’t talk to me about that!” and went off, and later circled back and had a merry chat without once mentioning the banned topic, not that we minded at all. The usefulness of introducing the topic to those infected by the AIDS meme is generally nil, we already know.

The Sachs syndrome

A similar reaction occurs on the public level, which one might call the Sachs syndrome, after Jeremy Sachs, the Columbia economist who has steered the UN into rescuing the world’s poor. Sachs, when we mentioned giving him a report on Duesberg in a personal conversation exiting a Barnard conference, responded “Any topic but that!” and hurried off, instinctively placing as much distance between himself and the topic as possible.

A similar reaction ws shown by the president of the New York Academy of Sciences, when your faithful correspondent discovered him talking about Duesberg to a California physicist giving a book lecture at the Academy. Asked later about what he had been saying as we were leaving, he also accelerated his walk saying he “wouldn’t ever say anything about Duesberg” and he “had to go to dinner” and vanished down the dark street in mid conversation, exactly like Sachs.

This is why we admire Bill Clinton as possibly the only man at the top whose mind is still active and open on the topic. As he told us recently, “I never close the door on scientific questions. It’s wrong.”

Call it evasion, aqvoidance, denial, psychic murder, or social gunning down, but the same process is at work as in the Amazon, and those such as Maggiore, Duesberg, Farber, Bialy, Crowe, Davis, Steele, Scheff, Shenton and all the other names on the long roll call of honor of people who put truth, justice, science, and humanity above their own skins, have to endure the penalty exacted on those who put informing people of the truth above their own self-interest.

Struggling to Save His Amazon, From the Top of a Death List

(show)

December 30, 2006

The Saturday Profile

Struggling to Save His Amazon, From the Top of a Death List

By LARRY ROHTER

ALTAMIRA, Brazil

EARLY last year, a dubious distinction attached itself to Tarcísio Feitosa da Silva, director of the Roman Catholic Church’s Pastoral Land Commission here in one of the most conflict-ridden regions of the Amazon. After the American nun Dorothy Stang was shot to death on a jungle road, he replaced her at the top of the death list that loggers, ranchers, miners and land speculators are known to maintain.

It is, of course, a form of recognition that Mr. Feitosa, 35, and his family would prefer he not have. But it testifies to the effectiveness of his work on behalf of Indian tribes, peasant settlers and river-dwellers and to preserve what remains of the endangered rain forest here.

Along with other religious and community groups, the entity Mr. Feitosa leads has challenged forged land titles, denounced unauthorized logging and organized peasant farmers to resist land invasions. Recently, those efforts have been rewarded with a government decree establishing a system of nature reserves that, if put into practice, will force many wealthy ranchers and loggers to leave the lands they currently control, without compensation.

“We have chosen an option that in this region seems radical, that of keeping the forest standing,” Mr. Feitosa said. “That has jolted powerful interests that in every other part of the Amazon have been able to topple the forest.”

Mr. Feitosa is himself a pure product of the Amazon, born and raised in this frontier town of 77,000 at the junction of the Trans-Amazon Highway and the Xingu River. His mother is a rubber tapper’s daughter, while his father, originally a crab fisherman, came here as a sharecropper around 1970, when the highway was being built.

“Part of my origin is in the forest and the other part is in the water,” Mr. Feitosa said. “I’ve had offers to go elsewhere, but I’ve always insisted on living and working here.”

Mr. Feitosa’s mother had once been a nun, and later worked in a medical clinic here that catered to the poor. It was from her, he believes, that he inherited his vocation for social service.

“My mother always said that you shouldn’t be concerned just with yourself, that you have to worry about society,” he said. “My mother was always linked to church and community movements, so I think that gene came from her.”

She also passed along her religious faith to him, the eldest of her three children. Though he never contemplated becoming a priest “because I didn’t want to spend six years in a seminary,” Mr. Feitosa describes himself as devoted to the idea of living “a Christian life, by Christian principles, as a Christian citizen” and to the Church itself.

“To me, my faith is something essential,” he explained. “People say I’m a real churchgoer. I was an altar boy in my parish for a long time, and used to try to pay attention to the words of the priests who were celebrating Mass. But I never really understood that phrase that comes just before communion, the one about ‘behold the mystery of faith.’ ”

But then one day, while visiting an Indian village, in an episode Mr. Feitosa describes as a turning point in his life, he was invited by his hosts to go hunting in the jungle. The hunting party killed a deer, skinned it and brought the meat back to the settlement.

“I was super happy, thinking my group would get the best part,” he recalled. “But then one old woman came and cut the haunches, then another old woman and another and another. In the end, after all the ribs were taken too, all that remained for us who had made such a big sacrifice was a little piece of meat.

“My first reaction was, how could a thing like this happen? I had gone the whole day without eating, walked I don’t know how many kilometers in the jungle and helped to carry that deer back on my shoulders. But then I realized that what is on the table is meant to be shared, and that is the mystery of faith. So I think that was the first true Eucharist that I ever experienced.”

MR. FEITOSA divides the history of his native region into two periods: before the construction of the Trans-Amazon Highway and after. He remembers swimming and fishing as a child in areas that have been deforested and developed, and notes ruefully that one must now travel far to find truly unspoiled jungle.

“The people who came here after the highway opened saw the forest as a obstacle to development,” he said, adding: “Nobody thought of biodiversity, nobody thought of the potential the forest itself offered; the rule was to destroy.”

The situation worsened, he maintains, in the 1990s. He began working for the Pastoral Land Commission then, and started to confront those who saw the Amazon as a source of quick profits.

“The loggers would first come in to exploit the Indian lands and then move into the Midlands looking for mahogany,” he recalled. “There were moments when you’d get really tense, because there were a lot of invasions and these were big, big companies that would run you right over.”

This year Mr. Feitosa won the Goldman Environmental Prize, which comes with a $125,000 grant, most of which he plans to use for work with jungle communities. The citation noted that Mr. Feitosa’s home state of Pará is now “one of the deep Amazon’s most lawless and environmentally threatened regions.”

THERE is indeed a violent Wild West atmosphere here, which existed long before the killing of Sister Dorothy on Feb. 12, 2005. Human rights groups talk of more than 60 politically motivated murders in the region.

As bad as things are now, Mr. Feitosa fears they are about to become worse. “The war in this region hasn’t even started,” he said. “It’s only going to start when the authorities come to remove the ranchers from the lands they got through bogus means and then deforested illegally. Then it’s going to get really violent.”

Mr. Feitosa said his activities “make my wife nervous, but she understands that I can’t stop doing what I do.” The couple, who married when he was 19 and she 15, have two sons, ages 12 and 13, who are subjected to a strict curfew and have been given cellphones so that they can always be in touch with their parents.

“I watch out for myself,” he said. “I don’t walk around alone anymore, especially at night, and I don’t get into a taxi unless the driver is someone I know. Since a lot of killings have occurred in people’s homes, my father has also put barriers on all the windows and doors.”

Still, Mr. Feitosa said, “If they want to do it, they are going to do it. You can’t impede them. I have to trust in God.”

Sister Dorothy also trusted in God, and that, in the end, was not enough to protect her. “She aroused the ire of a lot of people by discovering all those irregularities that were going to damage a lot of big interests,” he acknowledged. Has he also enraged those same interests? “Maybe so,” he replied, “but they are going to have to leave. The forest must be kept alive for the benefit of all, not just a few speculators.”

“I go to Mass every Sunday at 6:30 in the afternoon,” he added with a shrug. “If someone wants to kill me, they already know the route.”

Copyright 2006 The New York Times Company

(hide)

Oprah’s incredible Xmas journey

December 25th, 2006


Replay of South African trip rekindles joy in hearts of audience

But does “AIDS” mean only one treatment?

Oprah visited South Africa about two years ago, and celebrated Christmas by rerunning the segment this Christmas Day.

She gave clothes to poor children there, who were quite transformed by the simple gifts, which were the only decent costume they had had for quite a while, if ever. The joy that broke out in the hall was ecstatic. Children ran to hug Oprah and say “I love you Oprah”. “I love you too”, Oprah replied. She also handed out each child a box with packaged food for a month. Afterwards she broke out in loud sobs, as she walked away from the event.

((Click pics twice for maximum enlargement)).

She then visited the home of a (soon to be) AIDS orphan and then went with her to the mother lying in the hospital, hollow eyed, one eye grotesquely larger than the other, with “AIDS”, although the public hospital had no drugs to treat her, because the government had not provided any, the black doctor explained to Oprah.

Oprah broke down at this and cried in public, sobbing “I don’t understand it. I don’t understand it.” When she finished sobbing, she hugged the child for a long moment that the cameras caught in full.

Later, she tells us that she has now discovered her purpose in life, and the reason why she has never married. It is to use her voice to rescue the children of South Africa from the rural sex orgy spreading HIV among their parents.

Now, she reports from stage today, the government has agreed to supply drugs. She wants you to find the same joy in giving by doing something for these people, whose country has more people with AIDS than any other. You can contribute to her “Angel Network” which presumably will send more drugs.

Question: If the woman was not treated for AIDS, was she treated for anything else? The doctor told Oprah she was treated for her symptoms, but the response seemed to be only acquiescence to Oprah’s question in this regard. So evidently what was meant was any symptoms were alleviated as far as possible.

The mother subsequently died. If she died of TB, was she treated for TB, or not? Presumably not effectively. Why not? is there a shortage of antibiotics or whatever cures TB, or is African TB too lethal in poor people? It certainly is rampant in Africa, and a new strain is said to be causing new problems.

Bottom line: Does the diagnosis of supposed AIDS mean that they don’t bother to give a mother any antibiotics? Surely not.

But one suspects that this is a possibility. Once “AIDS” is the diagnosis, the assumption of everybody involved is that only Western drugs can save the patient.

Certainly this is the assumption of all viewers of this segment, which follows a repeat of Oprah’s “Buy Red with Bono” show a couple of weeks ago.

At this rate Dr Anthony Fauci is probably in love with Oprah, who has become the largest propaganda spokesman for the standard wisdom in AIDS short of WHO.

Audience: 7 million or more.

Comedy on the TV screen Tues

December 25th, 2006