Science Guardian

Truth, beauty and paradigm power in science and society

I am Nicolaus Copernicus, and I approve of this blog

News, views and reviews measured against professional literature in peer reviewed journals (adjusted for design flaws and bias), well researched books, authoritative encyclopedias (not the bowdlerized Wiki entries on controversial topics) and the investigative reporting and skeptical studies of courageous original thinkers among academics, philosophers, researchers, scholars, authors, filmmakers and journalists.

Supporting the right of exceptional minds to free speech, publication, media coverage and funding against the crowd prejudice, leadership resistance, monetary influences and internal professional politics of the paradigm wars of cancer, HIV(not)AIDS, evolution, global warming, cosmology, particle physics, macroeconomics, information technology, religions and cults, health, medicine, diet and nutrition.

***************************************************

HONOR ROLL OF SCIENTIFIC TRUTHSEEKERS

Halton C. Arp wki/obit/txt/vds/txt/txt/bk/bk, Henry Bauer txt/blg/ blg/bks/bk/txt/bk/vd, John Beard bk, Harvey Bialy bk/bk/txt/txt/rdo/vd, John Bockris bio/txt/ltr/bk, Donald W. Braben, Peter Breggin ste/fb/col/bks, Darin Brown txt/txt/txt/txt/txt/vd, Giordano Bruno bk/bio/bio, Frank R. Buianouckas, Stanislav Burzynski mov, Erwin Chargaff bio/bk/bio/prs, James Chin bk/vd, Nicolaus Copernicus bk, Mark Craddock, Francis Crick vd, Paul Crutzen, Marie Curie, Rebecca Culshaw txt/bk, Roger Cunningham, Charles Darwin txts/bk, Erasmus Darwin txt//bk/txt/hse/bks, Peter Duesberg ste/ste/bk/txt/vd/vd, Freeman Dyson, Albert Einstein, Richard Feynman bio, John Fewster, Rosalind Franklin, Bernard Forscher tx, Galileo Galilei, Walter Gilbert vd, Goethe bio/bk/bio, Nicolas Gonzalez tlk/rec/stetxt/txt, Patricia Goodson txt/bk/bk, Alec Gordon, James Hansen, Etienne de Harven bk/txt/vd, Alfred Hassig intw/txt, Robert G. Houston txt, Steven Jonas vd, Edward Jenner txt, Benjamin Jesty, Adrian Kent vd, Thomas Kuhn, Fred Kummerow, Stefan Lanka txt/txt/vd, Serge Lang, John Lauritsen vd, Paul Lauterbur vd, Mark Leggett, Richard Lindzen, James Lovelock, Andrew Maniotis, Lynn Margulis, Barbara McClintock, Christi Meyer vd, George Miklos, Marco Mamone Capria, Peter Medawar, Luc Montagnier txt/txt/vd, Kary Mullis, Linus Pauling prs/vd/vd, Eric Penrose, Roger Penrose vd, Max Planck, Rainer Plaga, David Rasnick bio/vd/bk, Robert Root-Bernstein vd, Sherwood Rowland, Otto Rossler, Harry Rubin, Marco Ruggiero txt/txt/intw/vd, Bertrand Russell Carl Sagan vd, Erwin Schrodinger, Fred Singer, Barbara Starfield txt, Gordon Stewart txt/txt, Richard Strohman, Thomas Szasz, Nicola Tesla bio/bio, Charles Thomas intw/vd, Frank Tipler, James Watson vd/vd, Alfred Wegener vd, Edward O. Wilson vd.

ACADEMICS, DOCTORS, AUTHORS, FILMMAKERS, REPORTERS AND COMMENTATORS WHO HAVE NOBLY AIDED REVIEW OF THE STATUS QUO

Jad Adams bk, Marci Angell bk/txt/txt/txt, Clark Baker ste/txt/rdo/vd, James Blodgett, Tony Brown vd, Hiram Caton txt/txt/txt/bk/ste, Jonathan Collin ste , Marcus Cohen, David Crowe vd, Margaret Cuomo, Stephen Davis BK/BK,/rdo, Michael Ellner vd, Elizabeth Ely txt/txt/ste, Epicurus, Dean Esmay, Celia Farber bio/txt/txt/txt/vd, Jonathan Fishbein txt/txt/wk, T.C.Fry, Michael Fumento, Max Gerson txt, Charles Geshekter vd, Michael Geiger, Roberto Giraldo, David Healy txt, Bob Herbert, Mike Hersee ste/rdo, Neville Hodgkinson txt /vd, James P. Hogan, Richard Horton bio/vd/vd, Christopher Hitchens, Eric Johnson, Claus Jensen vd, Phillip Johnson, Coleman Jones vds, William Donald Kelley, Ernst T. Krebs Sr txt, Ernst T. Krebs Jr. txt,/bio/txt/txt/ltr, Paul Krugman, Brett Leung MOV/ste/txt/txt/tx+vd/txt, Katie Leishman, Anthony Liversidge blg/intv/intv/txt/txts/txt/intv/txt/vd/vd, Bruce Livesey txt, James W. Loewen, Frank Lusardi, Nathaniel Lehrman vd, Christine Maggiore bk/ste/rec/rdo/vd, Rouben Mamoulian txt/txt/txt/txt/txt/doc/flm/flm, Noreen Martin vd, Robert Maver txt/itw, Eric Merola MOV, Lady Mary Wortley Montagu, Michael Moore bio/MOV/MOV/MOV, Gordon Moran, Ralph Nader bk, Ralph Moss txt/blg/ste/bks, Gary Null /txt/rdo/vd, Dan Olmsted wki, Toby Ord vd, Charles Ortleb bk/txt/bk/intw/flm, Neenyah Ostrom bk, Dennis Overbye, Mehmet Dr Oz vd, Eleni Papadopulos-Eleopulos ste/vd, Maria Papagiannidou bk, Thomas Piketty bk/bk/bk/bk/bk/bk/bk/bk/bk/bk, Robert Pollin txt/vd/bk, Jon Rappoport bio/bk/bk/ste/bk/bk/vd, Janine Roberts bk/bk, Luis Sancho vd, Liam Scheff ste/txt/bk/bk/rdio/vd, John Scythes, Casper Schmidt txt/txt, Joan Shenton vd/vd, Joseph Sonnabend vd, John Stauber, David Steele, Joseph Stiglitz bk/txt, Will Storr rdo Wolfgang Streeck, James P. Tankersley ste, Gary Taubes vd, Mwizenge S. Tembo, John Tierney vd, Michael Tracey, Valendar Turner rec, Jesse Ventura bk, Michael Verney-Elliott bio/vds/vd, Voltaire, Walter Wagner, Andrew Weil vd, David Weinberger bio/bk/blg/blg/BK/bk/pds, Robert Willner bk/txt/txt/vd, Howard Zinn.

*****************************************************
I am Albert Einstein, and I heartily approve of this blog, insofar as it seems to believe both in science and the importance of intellectual imagination, uncompromised by out of date emotions such as the impulse toward conventional religious beliefs, national aggression as a part of patriotism, and so on.   As I once remarked, the further the spiritual evolution of mankind advances, the more certain it seems to me that the path to genuine religiosity does not lie through the fear of life, and the fear of death, and blind faith, but through striving after rational knowledge.   Certainly the application of the impulse toward blind faith in science whereby authority is treated as some kind of church is to be deplored.  As I have also said, the only thing that ever interfered with my learning was my education. I am Freeman Dyson, and I approve of this blog, but would warn the author that life as a heretic is a hard one, since the ignorant and the half informed, let alone those who should know better, will automatically trash their betters who try to enlighten them with independent thinking, as I have found to my sorrow in commenting on "global warming" and its cures.
Many people would die rather than think – in fact, they do so. – Bertrand Russell.

The progress of science is strewn, like an ancient desert trail, with the bleached skeletons of discarded theories which once seemed to possess eternal life. - Arthur Koestler

One should as a rule respect public opinion in so far as is necessary to avoid starvation and to keep out of prison. – Bertrand Russell

Fraud and falsehood only dread examination. Truth invites it. - Samuel Johnson

A sudden bold and unexpected question doth many times surprise a man and lay him open. – Sir Francis Bacon (1561 – 1626)

He who knows only his own side of the case, knows little of that. – John Stuart Mill

Whenever you find that you are on the side of the majority, it is time to reform. – Mark Twain

Although science has led to the generally high living standards that most of the industrialized world enjoys today, the astounding discoveries underpinning them were made by a tiny number of courageous, out-of-step, visionary, determined, and passionate scientists working to their own agenda and radically challenging the status quo. – Donald W. Braben

An old error is always more popular than a new truth. — German Proverb

I am Richard Feynman and I approve of this blog

When even the brightest mind in our world has been trained up from childhood in a superstition of any kind, it will never be possible for that mind, in its maturity, to examine sincerely, dispassionately, and conscientiously any evidence or any circumstance which shall seem to cast a doubt upon the validity of that superstition. I doubt if I could do it myself. – Mark Twain

It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his income depends on his not understanding it. – Upton Sinclair

A clash of doctrines is not a disaster, but an opportunity. - Alfred North Whitehead

Fraud and falsehood only dread examination. Truth invites it. – Samuel Johnson

Man’s mind cannot grasp the causes of events in their completeness, but the desire to find those causes is implanted in man’s soul. And without considering the multiplicity and complexity of the conditions any one of which taken separately may seem to be the cause, he snatches at the first approximation to a cause that seems to him intelligible and says: “This is the cause!” – Leo Tolstoy

The evolution of the world tends to show the absolute importance of the category of the individual apart from the crowd. - Soren Kierkegaard

Who does not know the truth is simply a fool, yet who knows the truth and calls it a lie is a criminal. – Bertold Brecht

How easily the learned give up the evidence of their senses to preserve the coherence of ideas in their imagination. – Adam Smith

Education consists mainly in what we have unlearned. – Mark Twain

The mind likes a strange idea as little as the body likes a strange protein and resists it with similar energy. If we watch ourselves honestly, we shall often find that we have begun to argue against a new idea even before it has been completely stated. – Arthur Koestler

Whenever the human race assembles to a number exceeding four, it cannot stand free speech. – Mark Twain

People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices. - Adam Smith

There isn’t anything so grotesque or so incredible that the average human being can’t believe it. – Mark Twain

He who knows only his own side of the case, knows little of that. – John Stuart Mill

It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere. – Voltaire

People are generally better persuaded by the reasons which they have themselves discovered than by those which have come into the mind of others.- Blaise Pascal.

Illusion is the first of all pleasures. – Voltaire

The applause of a single human being is of great consequence. – Samuel Johnson

(Click for more Unusual Quotations on Science and Human Nature)

Important: This site is best viewed in LARGE FONT, and in Firefox for image title visibility (place cursor on pics to reveal comments) and layout display. Click the title of any post to get only that post and its Comments for printing. All posts guaranteed fact checked according to reference level cited, typically the original journal studies. Full guide to site purpose, layout and how to print posts out is in the lower blue section at the bottom of the home page.
---Admin AL/E/ILMK---

Are the Nobels in the grip of the drug companies?

A correspondent raises the following question in the comments earlier and the topic deserves a post of its own, because we think his sensible skepticism about some science has fallen into exaggerated cynicism about all of it.

Here is Marcel’s message in response to the post “Nobel for scientists who rejected dogma:

Truthseeker, when I read about this I wondered if this wasn’t just another example of the microbiological prejudice that biology has, and that maybe it’s just another case of blaming toxic or other problems on a microbe. You are confident this isn’t so? This bacterial cause is proven? I mean REALLY proven?

I think the Nobel and all other prizes should be discontinued. How many times have they honored an idiot who was totally wrong, and sent science in the wrong direction, from which it still hasn’t recovered? Too often, IMO.

I also would like to know what the mechanism is of Nobel prizes. Who are the advisers? Do they have links to Big Pharma? Does Big Pharma contribute money to the Nobel Prizes?

The only way to get science back on the right track is to defund it.

10.7.2005 11:47am

Seems to us that the answer to such doubts should be this:

Marcel, while we appreciate your skepticism about the motivations and modus operandi of the Nobel committee we cannot easily join you in your wholesale cynicism about science and its prizes. Science in practice is an enormous body of people and their achievements have led to major practical tools and weapons which wouldn’t work if the principles upon which thjey were designed were false. Science in general is clearly on the main track of reality and truth even if sometimes it goes off the rails.

In this case, although we have not read deeply into this one as yet, it would seem to us a priori that the two Aussies (a known down-to-earth species) had to get through enough static and ridicule to have genuinely proved their scientific case. We accept this Nobel as going to a simple and practical achievement that for once is irrefutable.

We think you have to guard against becoming extreme in your skepticism about the claims and motivations of those atop science, just as carefully as you have to guard against swallowing whole everything announced in the name of science or medicine.

It is true that the case of AIDS seems to have shown that no unfounded claim is too big to become universally believed, but we already knew that from Goebbels. AIDS, however, is an exceptional case, since it was driven from the very beginning by the most powerful government and then drug company politics. And it is a theory that is very difficult to prove false ie that HIV doesn’t have something to do with the immune dysfunction of AIDS is hard to demonstrate, since there are endless Ptolemaic “explanations” to dispense with objections based on standard science.

Have a look at these two scientists and see if you can’t agree that their work is likely to be genuine. As genuine as, for example, Kary Mullis’s PCR, for whiuch he received the Nobel, an inspiration which has helped to free well over 100 falsely accused prisoners, some of them from Death Row; or this year’s Laskers for the Southern blot and genetic fingerprinting.

“The Lasker Clinical Research Award which is considered by many to be a predictor of future Nobel laureates was awarded to Professor Southern and Professor Sir Alec Jeffreys of the University of Leicester – who gained his DPhil at Oxford and received an honorary degree from the University in 2004 – for two related breakthroughs which revolutionised human genetics and forensic science. Professor Southern has been honoured for the development of a technique, called Southern blotting, which allows detection of a single gene in a complex genome, eventually enabling the rapid sequencing of entire genomes. This advance fostered Professor Jeffrey’s breakthrough – genetic fingerprinting.”

These are prizes for concrete achievements with proven merit and huge practical application. Unlike some of the ones in the past, we’ll grant you, such as the Lasker for Gallo, Montagnier and Essex. Please note, however, that the Nobel has not yet gone to that bunch of AIDS stars, at least two of whom it must be said nowadays look more like knaves than pure geniuses to us in their photos on this Lasker page: .

A young Robert Gallo, in 1986. Hailed as discoverer of HIV in the mail from Montagnier (twice, since he lost the first batch).

A younger Luc Montagnier, recognized as the discoverer of HIV and endless seeker of a co-factor, for which he was temporarily drummed out of the Bob Club.

The young Max Essex, pride of Harvard and later entrepreneur, who will discover an HIV equivalent in cats which remarkably causes immune suppression (loss of cells) at the same time as leukemia (more cells), for which he now receives royalties for a test used throughout the US.

The suspicion that the world is entirely run by knaves and fools is just as naive as the faith it is run entirely by heroic idealists. But in this Australian case we’d say the awardees are heroic idealists for sure, even if the prize was awarded by a committee of fools, which the Nobel committee occasionally has also shown itself to be.

“The Politics of Excellence: Behind the Nobel prize in Science” by Robert Marc Friedman is one book we recommend as a pretty good history of the way things work behind the scenes in Stockholm. The story of how much trouble they had awarding Einstein a prize for anything, let alone Relativity (they never did for that), is a classic tale of closed versus open minds.

That said, we agree that it is definitely possible that the influence of drug companies on Nobels may well be felt through the fact that the prize is award partly with the guidance and input of previous Nobelists, who include more than one knave who likes to play politics behind the scenes. The man we are thinking of once sent a venomous letter behind the back of a colleague to everyone else in his university, and the colleague didn’t discover its existence for a year.

The important point to be made on this site is that we are not arguing that all or even much of science is a corrupt mess. We are simply saying that the gold standard of science is its most severely tested literature, and it is that which should be the guide for all scientists, doctors and health officials, journalists and even science critics, not the personal reassurances of individual scientists which escape peer review.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Bad Behavior has blocked 1246 access attempts in the last 7 days.