“McCain understands the stakes” as Bush puts it. Another 4 years of sweet Jesus.

Speaking of Jesus, let’s not forget something completely unrelated; McCain showing his hand in embracing a certain Pastor John C. Hagee, CEO Global Evangelism Television, and his endorsement.

http://www.johnmccain.com/Informing/Multimedia/Player.aspx?guid=5ca47a36-c7d8-4cf4-8451-0390c4581916

Hagee, as we know, believes that Katrina was a punishment for New Orleans’ sins timed as a pre-emptive strike against a scheduled gay parade. He believes that Iran is unrepentent as a matter of Essential Nature, as well as sacred historical necessity, and must be dealt with by pre-emptive strike. He believes that Harry Potter is inspired by the Devil (no word of pre-emptive strikes yet). He believes that the anti-Christ will manifest himself as head of the EU. He believes that the catholic church is the Great Whore. Etc.

John McCain says he is proud of pastor Hagee’s spiritual leadership.

http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/02/29/mccain-defends-hagee-endorsement-despite-differences/

McCain is also proud of Hagee’s commitment to Israel.

The spiritual underpinnings of Pastor Hagee’s commitment to Israel is the crucial role it will play in launching said pre-emptive strike against Iran, uniting the “Arab” nations under Russia against it and plunging the whole region into apocalytic war. http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?articleId=11541

McCain is so proud of pastor Hagee’s spiritual leadership and commitment to Israel as the catalyst for imminent holocaust in the Middle-East that he thinks it overrides what most presidential candidates are supposed to be running on, namely the (secular) concerns of the American people:

Much more importantly, McCain explained/justified embracing Hagee by saying “he is doing a lot of good things for Israel.” Confusedresponderer has already touched on the eschatological twist to Hagee’s Israel support, as has Glen Greenwald on his blog. But even if this were not a factor, the utilitarian calculus by which McCain, during a campaign for the American presidency, aligns himself with the fringiest of the fringe because it is perceived as “good for Israel” – another country in another hemisphere! – is so revealing of the man and the subordination of the American people’s interests to the values and global interests of certain unrepresentative factions that the CIA, at least in a country where the media could conceivably function as anything but a reliably comatose bystander, ought to have classified the comment and buried it in its deepest, darkest vaults.

To the potential wishy washers, let me drive the point all the way home: Even if the Obamas were to come out and say they embrace the allegedly racially charged “black values” of Dr. Wright, or the definitely racially charged “white skunks, white conspiracies” rethoric of Louis Farrakhan because “they are doing a lot of good” for Afro-Americans, well at least those are Afro-AMERICANS – not Afro-Africans or Afro-Israelis.

//turcopolier.typepad.com/sic_semper_tyrannis/2008/02/john-hagee-mcca/comments/page/2/#comments

Speaking of Israel, Chomsky and debates, let us not forget either the debate where Chomsky dressed down leading neo-con light and commited Israel supporter, Richard Perle:

Now if you listen to Mr. Perle carefully, you will notice that a word was sneaked in there: that was the word recognition of their [Israel's] legitimacy. Now that they will not do. There is an interesting diplomatic history with regard to the Middle East. The United States has been trying to block a settlement for a long time. As it became obvious that the PLO and the Arab states were quite willing to accept the existence of Israel — the existence of Israel — that is, to achieve a two-state settlement with recognized borders, with international guarantees, with mutual recognition and so on, after it became obvious that this was possible, it was necessary to up the ante a notch. And what happened was — and here, take a look at the recent American diplomatic history, I urge you to look at the documents, very informative — you’ll notice that the position was changed. It was not enough for them to recognize Israel: they had to recognize the legitimacy of Israel, or the right to exist of Israel. Now “right to exist” is something that does not exist in international law. No state recognizes the right of any other state to exist. Mexico does not recognize the right of the United…
PERLE: Most states don’t question the right of other states to exist.
CHOMSKY: Excuse me. That’s not true. We reject outright the right of the Soviet Union…
PERLE: No we don’t.
CHOMSKY: …to exist in its present borders. That’s why…
PERLE: Not at all.
CHOMSKY: …we have Captive Nations Week every year. And we may be perfectly right in doing that. Mexico does not recognize the right of the United States to exist within its present borders, which happen to include a third of Mexico. In fact, in the international system, there is a notion of recognition of a state, but there is no notion of recognition of the legitimacy of a state. To call on the Palestinians to accept this new concept is to ask them to accept that it’s not only that there is a state in an area which they regard as their own — they’re willing to recognize that — but to recognize the right of that state to have dispossessed them. Of course, they’re not going to accept that, nor should they, there is no such thing in international affairs, and the effort to try to obtain it is pointless and absurd.

Which seamlessly leads me to NAFTA: The economists referenced by Truthseeker argue very convincingly that the US hasn’t slid back overall under NAFTA. But that doesn’t mean certain groups haven’t been hit unnecessarily, or that NAFTA is responsible for an overall positive growth that wouldn’t have happened anyway oder. . .?

“John F. Kennedy had a relationship with Sam Giancana. LBJ associated with Bobby Baker, Clint Murchison and other shady characters. Harry Truman was connected to mob lawyer Morris Shenker. Richard Nixon associated with mob-connected figures like Mickey Cohen, Bebe Rebozo, Carlos Marcello, Jimmy Hoffa and many others. Bill Clinton pardoned fugitive Marc Rich. Our greatest presidents have all been associated with the mob. So my friendship with Tony Rezko proves that I have the right stuff to be president!”

The election is following a pre-written script. The writers of the script want an exciting horse race because that will help persuade the sheeple that they are participating in “democracy” in action. In reality, Hilly was elected president 2 years ago or earlier, when David cast his vote at the Bilderberg conference.

What you are seeing is a charade, a dog and pony show to make the masses believe that they have democracy, when in reality the super-elite pick all the candidates. They picked Barack, too. The whole idea is you have to have two people who are “liberal” archetypes, i.e., a black and a woman, in order to mask the reality that both of them are devoted to the New World Order of globalization, which amounts to a world corporate dictatorship run largely by Pharma, Big Oil and the agribusiness and military industries. Except on minor “hot button,” high profile issues like abortion, both candidates intend to continue most of Bush’s policies. Which are not much different from Bill Clinton’s policies. Indeed, Bill Clinton or Al Gore both would have gone into Iraq, had they been in charge at the time. Because they are not making the decisions, their puppetmasters are. And the puppetmasters of the Democrats are the same group that pull the Republicans’ strings.

Bush really wants Hilly to win, as he knows that it’s time for the “good cop” to supplant the “bad cop” in the Great Game. McCain is fully aware that he is just an actor in the Game and has no chance to win. He is just being a loyal soldier to the elite, who are of course his bosses, too.

The new Diebold voting machines make it simple for them to make the primary elections turn out according to the script. And the media polls are probably fake as well, as the media’s propaganda role is well established, and it’s not just on the subject of Aids, it’s on all serious subjects. Too bad that some educated people continue to support the propaganda by buying the most offensive fish wrapper of all — the New York Times.

Your admiration of Obama is incredibly naive, he’s just one of the Global Elite’s “Front Office Nig**rs” . He is ruled by the men behind the curtain, as is Hitlery.

But, I very confidently predict that David really prefers Hitlery in the top spot, and she will “come from behind” to emerge as the winner, and beat McCain. Obama will be her running mate.

An exciting sporting event for the sheeple, bread and circuses and all that, and things will only get worse under Hilly.