Science Guardian

Truth, beauty and paradigm power in science and society

I am Nicolaus Copernicus, and I approve of this blog

News, views and reviews measured against professional literature in peer reviewed journals (adjusted for design flaws and bias), well researched books, authoritative encyclopedias (not the bowdlerized Wiki entries on controversial topics) and the investigative reporting and skeptical studies of courageous original thinkers among academics, philosophers, researchers, scholars, authors, filmmakers and journalists.

Supporting the right of exceptional minds to free speech, publication, media coverage and funding against the crowd prejudice, leadership resistance, monetary influences and internal professional politics of the paradigm wars of cancer, HIV(not)AIDS, evolution, global warming, cosmology, particle physics, macroeconomics, information technology, religions and cults, health, medicine, diet and nutrition.



Halton C. Arp wki/obit/txt/vds/txt/txt/bk/bk, Henry Bauer txt/blg/ blg/bks/bk/txt/bk/vd, John Beard bk, Harvey Bialy bk/bk/txt/txt/rdo/vd, John Bockris bio/txt/ltr/bk, Donald W. Braben, Peter Breggin ste/fb/col/bks, Darin Brown txt/txt/txt/txt/txt/vd, Giordano Bruno bk/bio/bio, Frank R. Buianouckas, Stanislav Burzynski mov, Erwin Chargaff bio/bk/bio/prs, James Chin bk/vd, Nicolaus Copernicus bk, Mark Craddock, Francis Crick vd, Paul Crutzen, Marie Curie, Rebecca Culshaw txt/bk, Roger Cunningham, Charles Darwin txts/bk, Erasmus Darwin txt//bk/txt/hse/bks, Peter Duesberg ste/ste/bk/txt/vd/vd, Freeman Dyson, Albert Einstein, Richard Feynman bio, John Fewster, Rosalind Franklin, Bernard Forscher tx, Galileo Galilei, Walter Gilbert vd, Goethe bio/bk/bio, Nicolas Gonzalez tlk/rec/stetxt/txt, Patricia Goodson txt/bk/bk, Alec Gordon, James Hansen, Etienne de Harven bk/txt/vd, Alfred Hassig intw/txt, Robert G. Houston txt, Steven Jonas vd, Edward Jenner txt, Benjamin Jesty, Adrian Kent vd, Thomas Kuhn, Fred Kummerow, Stefan Lanka txt/txt/vd, Serge Lang, John Lauritsen vd, Paul Lauterbur vd, Mark Leggett, Richard Lindzen, James Lovelock, Andrew Maniotis, Lynn Margulis, Barbara McClintock, Christi Meyer vd, George Miklos, Marco Mamone Capria, Peter Medawar, Luc Montagnier txt/txt/vd, Kary Mullis, Linus Pauling prs/vd/vd, Eric Penrose, Roger Penrose vd, Max Planck, Rainer Plaga, David Rasnick bio/vd/bk, Robert Root-Bernstein vd, Sherwood Rowland, Otto Rossler, Harry Rubin, Marco Ruggiero txt/txt/intw/vd, Bertrand Russell Carl Sagan vd, Erwin Schrodinger, Fred Singer, Barbara Starfield txt, Gordon Stewart txt/txt, Richard Strohman, Thomas Szasz, Nicola Tesla bio/bio, Charles Thomas intw/vd, Frank Tipler, James Watson vd/vd, Alfred Wegener vd, Edward O. Wilson vd.


Jad Adams bk, Marci Angell bk/txt/txt/txt, Clark Baker ste/txt/rdo/vd, James Blodgett, Tony Brown vd, Hiram Caton txt/txt/txt/bk/ste, Jonathan Collin ste , Marcus Cohen, David Crowe vd, Margaret Cuomo, Stephen Davis BK/BK,/rdo, Michael Ellner vd, Elizabeth Ely txt/txt/ste, Epicurus, Dean Esmay, Celia Farber bio/txt/txt/txt/vd, Jonathan Fishbein txt/txt/wk, T.C.Fry, Michael Fumento, Max Gerson txt, Charles Geshekter vd, Michael Geiger, Roberto Giraldo, David Healy txt, Bob Herbert, Mike Hersee ste/rdo, Neville Hodgkinson txt /vd, James P. Hogan, Richard Horton bio/vd/vd, Christopher Hitchens, Eric Johnson, Claus Jensen vd, Phillip Johnson, Coleman Jones vds, William Donald Kelley, Ernst T. Krebs Sr txt, Ernst T. Krebs Jr. txt,/bio/txt/txt/ltr, Paul Krugman, Brett Leung MOV/ste/txt/txt/tx+vd/txt, Katie Leishman, Anthony Liversidge blg/intv/intv/txt/txts/txt/intv/txt/vd/vd, Bruce Livesey txt, James W. Loewen, Frank Lusardi, Nathaniel Lehrman vd, Christine Maggiore bk/ste/rec/rdo/vd, Rouben Mamoulian txt/txt/txt/txt/txt/doc/flm/flm, Noreen Martin vd, Robert Maver txt/itw, Eric Merola MOV, Lady Mary Wortley Montagu, Michael Moore bio/MOV/MOV/MOV, Gordon Moran, Ralph Nader bk, Ralph Moss txt/blg/ste/bks, Gary Null /txt/rdo/vd, Dan Olmsted wki, Toby Ord vd, Charles Ortleb bk/txt/bk/intw/flm, Neenyah Ostrom bk, Dennis Overbye, Mehmet Dr Oz vd, Eleni Papadopulos-Eleopulos ste/vd, Maria Papagiannidou bk, Thomas Piketty bk/bk/bk/bk/bk/bk/bk/bk/bk/bk, Robert Pollin txt/vd/bk, Jon Rappoport bio/bk/bk/ste/bk/bk/vd, Janine Roberts bk/bk, Luis Sancho vd, Liam Scheff ste/txt/bk/bk/rdio/vd, John Scythes, Casper Schmidt txt/txt, Joan Shenton vd/vd, Joseph Sonnabend vd, John Stauber, David Steele, Joseph Stiglitz bk/txt, Will Storr rdo Wolfgang Streeck, James P. Tankersley ste, Gary Taubes vd, Mwizenge S. Tembo, John Tierney vd, Michael Tracey, Valendar Turner rec, Jesse Ventura bk, Michael Verney-Elliott bio/vds/vd, Voltaire, Walter Wagner, Andrew Weil vd, David Weinberger bio/bk/blg/blg/BK/bk/pds, Robert Willner bk/txt/txt/vd, Howard Zinn.

I am Albert Einstein, and I heartily approve of this blog, insofar as it seems to believe both in science and the importance of intellectual imagination, uncompromised by out of date emotions such as the impulse toward conventional religious beliefs, national aggression as a part of patriotism, and so on.   As I once remarked, the further the spiritual evolution of mankind advances, the more certain it seems to me that the path to genuine religiosity does not lie through the fear of life, and the fear of death, and blind faith, but through striving after rational knowledge.   Certainly the application of the impulse toward blind faith in science whereby authority is treated as some kind of church is to be deplored.  As I have also said, the only thing that ever interfered with my learning was my education. I am Freeman Dyson, and I approve of this blog, but would warn the author that life as a heretic is a hard one, since the ignorant and the half informed, let alone those who should know better, will automatically trash their betters who try to enlighten them with independent thinking, as I have found to my sorrow in commenting on "global warming" and its cures.
Many people would die rather than think – in fact, they do so. – Bertrand Russell.

The progress of science is strewn, like an ancient desert trail, with the bleached skeletons of discarded theories which once seemed to possess eternal life. - Arthur Koestler

One should as a rule respect public opinion in so far as is necessary to avoid starvation and to keep out of prison. – Bertrand Russell

Fraud and falsehood only dread examination. Truth invites it. - Samuel Johnson

A sudden bold and unexpected question doth many times surprise a man and lay him open. – Sir Francis Bacon (1561 – 1626)

He who knows only his own side of the case, knows little of that. – John Stuart Mill

Whenever you find that you are on the side of the majority, it is time to reform. – Mark Twain

Although science has led to the generally high living standards that most of the industrialized world enjoys today, the astounding discoveries underpinning them were made by a tiny number of courageous, out-of-step, visionary, determined, and passionate scientists working to their own agenda and radically challenging the status quo. – Donald W. Braben

An old error is always more popular than a new truth. — German Proverb

I am Richard Feynman and I approve of this blog

When even the brightest mind in our world has been trained up from childhood in a superstition of any kind, it will never be possible for that mind, in its maturity, to examine sincerely, dispassionately, and conscientiously any evidence or any circumstance which shall seem to cast a doubt upon the validity of that superstition. I doubt if I could do it myself. – Mark Twain

It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his income depends on his not understanding it. – Upton Sinclair

A clash of doctrines is not a disaster, but an opportunity. - Alfred North Whitehead

Fraud and falsehood only dread examination. Truth invites it. – Samuel Johnson

Man’s mind cannot grasp the causes of events in their completeness, but the desire to find those causes is implanted in man’s soul. And without considering the multiplicity and complexity of the conditions any one of which taken separately may seem to be the cause, he snatches at the first approximation to a cause that seems to him intelligible and says: “This is the cause!” – Leo Tolstoy

The evolution of the world tends to show the absolute importance of the category of the individual apart from the crowd. - Soren Kierkegaard

Who does not know the truth is simply a fool, yet who knows the truth and calls it a lie is a criminal. – Bertold Brecht

How easily the learned give up the evidence of their senses to preserve the coherence of ideas in their imagination. – Adam Smith

Education consists mainly in what we have unlearned. – Mark Twain

The mind likes a strange idea as little as the body likes a strange protein and resists it with similar energy. If we watch ourselves honestly, we shall often find that we have begun to argue against a new idea even before it has been completely stated. – Arthur Koestler

Whenever the human race assembles to a number exceeding four, it cannot stand free speech. – Mark Twain

People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices. - Adam Smith

There isn’t anything so grotesque or so incredible that the average human being can’t believe it. – Mark Twain

He who knows only his own side of the case, knows little of that. – John Stuart Mill

It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere. – Voltaire

People are generally better persuaded by the reasons which they have themselves discovered than by those which have come into the mind of others.- Blaise Pascal.

Illusion is the first of all pleasures. – Voltaire

The applause of a single human being is of great consequence. – Samuel Johnson

(Click for more Unusual Quotations on Science and Human Nature)

Important: This site is best viewed in LARGE FONT, and in Firefox for image title visibility (place cursor on pics to reveal comments) and layout display. Click the title of any post to get only that post and its Comments for printing. All posts guaranteed fact checked according to reference level cited, typically the original journal studies. Full guide to site purpose, layout and how to print posts out is in the lower blue section at the bottom of the home page.
---Admin AL/E/ILMK---

BMJ was misled, apologizes to Dr Rath

But who fed the BMJ false information?

Sleazy actions abound in defense of weak HIV∫AIDS paradigm

Vitamin booster and somewhat loopy world savior Dr. Matthias Rath is still in South Africa, and taking on all comers, even though leading HIV∫AIDS dissenting scientist Dr David Rasnick has returned to the USA, having understandably found him impossible to work for.

Only two weeks ago, Rath leveled a law suit against the British Medical Journal for slander, and today he got results. BMJ backed down, withdrawing the story from its site and issuing an apology.

However, it is not clear at all what the specific falsehoods were, since the original story is gone and they are not specified in the apology, and there is no mention yet of the affair on Rath’s site, which now claims that Bill Gates and Warren Buffett were reacting to Rath’s prediction of pharmacollapse with their recent global charity initiatives (a two year graph shows how many visits from Microsoft the site has collected).

Here’s how the story was described by Knowledgespeak, in its story two weeks ago, “Dutch doctor takes BMJ to court with libel charges – 15 Sep 2006:

Titled ‘Vitamins promoter goes on trial for fraud’, the article is about an alternative medicine doctor, who is blamed for the death of a nine-year-old boy with bone cancer. According to the story, the doctor is sent on trial for fraud in Germany for convincing the boy’s parents to reject conventional medical treatments, and use a ‘miracle cure’ rich in vitamins. The story, which was available online until recently, has been removed on legal advice.


Dr. Matthias Rath of the Netherlands has reportedly filed a lawsuit against BMJ Publishing Group for having published a story in the British Medical Journal, which he alleges is defamatory. He is seeking compensation of over £300,000 for the article published in the July edition of the journal. He has also sought an injunction to prevent any repetition of the allegations.

Titled ‘Vitamins promoter goes on trial for fraud’, the article is about an alternative medicine doctor, who is blamed for the death of a nine-year-old boy with bone cancer. According to the story, the doctor is sent on trial for fraud in Germany for convincing the boy’s parents to reject conventional medical treatments, and use a ‘miracle cure’ rich in vitamins. The story, which was available online until recently, has been removed on legal advice.

Following Dr. Rath’s publicity campaigns, several people have reportedly been giving up antiretroviral drugs to opt for vitamin supplements.

Seems that the BMJ were advised by their lawyers to back down in a hurry, and now they have done so.

Here is the page at BMJ where they have also removed the offending libel – the vanished article page – and here is
28.09.2006″>the BMJ Rath apology page

Oh, good, we see it does give the false allegations:

In a news item published in the 22 July 2006 issue of the BMJ (2006;333:166) and on the website, it was reported that Dr Matthias Rath had gone on trial in Hamburg “for fraud.”

In this context we suggested that Dr Rath stood accused of the serious crime of fraud in relation to the death in 2004 of Dominik Feld, a 9 year old boy with bone cancer; that he was culpably responsible for Dominik Feld’s death; and, in particular, that he had improperly pressured Dominik Feld’s parents into refusing to allow hospital doctors to amputate the boy’s infected leg in an effort to save him.

We now accept that the allegations we published were without foundation, and in the circumstances the BMJ wishes to set the record straight and to apologise to Dr Rath for publishing these allegations.

Sites such as Health-e which wrote stories based on the BMJ report have also withdrawn the story and apologized to Rath. A search for cached versions on Google shows that most or all of them have been removed.

Defending science with personal smears

Well, fine. A rather unexpected victory, given the circumstances, and the tendency for courts to credit ruling paradigms and conventional medicine as gospel truth, which makes one think the law will never give medical mavericks a fair shake. Whether Dr Rath has the right idea or the wrong idea, or even the right idea for the wrong reasons (we think more the latter), he should not be libelled.

But the residual important question is, who fed the BMJ the wrong information? Could it have been the South African activists who have been trying to drum him out of town? Was John Moore of Cornell involved in any way?

And will Moore et al’s scurrilously misleading AIDS information site, AIDSTruth also now carry this news item?

Poison pen letters as a weapon of science

Just how far are the sleazy group of second tier paradigm defenders prepared to go in combating their rivals on non-intellectual grounds? We note with interest that they indulge in sending letters to the employers of dissenters, hoping to silence them that way. This is a trick which most decent men and women wouldn’t think of, but which has been tried recently in three cases we know of.

Luckily in each case the employer didn’t take very long to work out why he or she was in receipt of such a puerile and perfidious attempt at backstabbing. After all, any sane person immediately recognizes how weak a scientific position has to be, if it must be defended with political means, especially with such ungentlemanly and crude capers.

It reminds us of a letter we were shown years ago by an MIT professor who had offended a certain Nobel prize winner by objecting to his joining the faculty. A libelous piece of trash written behind his back, it had taken a year for him to hear about it.

This kind of behind the back detraction is a standard ploy among the second rate who manoever for position which they do not merit. Scientists who are above board because they deserve their prizes and the respect and position they have earned often have no idea what is going on, and can hardly credit it when they are told.

One known perpetrator in HIV∫AIDS is John Moore of Cornell, and there are others, such as Nancy Padian, and Richard Jefferys, who have defended the paradigm in this way. But of course with Dr Anthony Fauci of NIAID censoring scientific or media review of the conventional wisdom from the very beginning of the HIV∫AIDS era twenty two years ago, perhaps they are merely following his lead and feel that their truth is a Holy War in which the Geneva Convention rules may be ignored.

9 Responses to “BMJ was misled, apologizes to Dr Rath”

  1. kevin Says:

    One more thing…I love the graphic with the BBC article…the one declaritively subtitled “HIV attacks immune cells”. How can you have a graphic illustrating that “attack” when the supporting article suggests that attack is indirect. I guess an “indirect” graphic might be misleading and cause misunderstanding, lol.

  2. kevin Says:

    Oops….the above comment is for a different article. Help?

    While I’m here…way to go Dr. Rath. Way to take those slimey editors to task for their slanderous drivel.

  3. Celia Farber Says:

    This is the most important story I have read about the AIDS war in a while. My blood ran cold when I read it, and I salute Truthseeker for the excellent reportage. As somebody who has been subject to slander, libel, attack, subversion, betrayal, and more, I have never found a satisfactory answer to my burning questions about what recourse a professional can take in these situations. Adding insult to injury, most people discourage the one affected by libel and slander from taking action, always citing that abstracted belief–the standard necessary to prove “damage.”

    My question is, what good does it to Rath that they retracted it? The damage is done. Will he or can he sue the guilty party for damages? Will he or can he compel them to show the world how, when, why and based on what “evidence” they published the spectacularly damaging libel against the man? An apology, to my mind, is woefully insufficient. Does anybody here know anything about libel laws?

  4. Truthseeker Says:

    Here is the story Health-e cached on the topic, signaled by a NYC correspondent, since the original story in the BMJ is securely locked up now.

    Rath on trial for fraud in Germany
    by Kerry Cullinan

    Controversial vitamin seller Dr Matthias Rath has gone on trial for fraud in Germany after he convinced the parents of a boy with bone cancer to reject conventional medicine and use his “miracle cure” vitamin pills instead, according to the British Medical Journal (BMJ).

    Dr. Matthias Rath

    Cape Times

    Dr Rath has raised a legal complaint about the truth of this story, which we are investigating.

    Controversial vitamin seller Dr Matthias Rath has gone on trial for fraud in Germany after he convinced the parents of a boy with bone cancer to reject conventional medicine and use his “miracle cure” vitamin pills instead, according to the British Medical Journal (BMJ).

    In this country, Rath claims that his vitamins can “reverse AIDS” and he encourages South Africans living with HIV not to go take “poisonous antiretroviral drugs”.

    Rath faces charges in a Hamburg court of falsely advertising his pills as a cure for cancer and contravening German laws by offering his vitamin products online without legal permission.

    Nine-year-old Dominik Feld was diagnosed with cancer in the bone of his right thigh in 2002. A few months later, his parents stopped their son’s chemotherapy and switched to Rath’s vitamins. They also refused to allow doctors to amputate his leg which had become riddled with cancer.

    However, doctors treating the boy were granted a court order allowing them, not his parents, to supervise his care in November 2003.

    This order was overturned on appeal in March 2004 and Dominik was returned to his parents’ care. He died in an alternative health clinic in November that year.

    Describing chemotherapy as “outmoded and inhuman”, Rath claims on his website that “Dominik did not die as a result of his cancer and metastasis of the lung, but rather as a result of a succession of medical errors made by doctors”.

    Rath adds that “it wasn’t the cancer that eventually defeated him; he was the victim of an antiquated medical system — one that wanted to exploit him to prove that cancer continues to be a death sentence.”

    Rath appeared briefly in the Hamburg court last week, but the case was postponed as the judge was ill.

    Dominik’s case received a lot of publicity in Germany and sales of Rath’s vitamins plummeted after Dominik died, according to a former staff member.

    Rath then came to South Africa and settled in Cape Town for a while where he linked up with prominent AIDS dissidents (people who don’t believe HIV causes AIDS) to undermine antiretroviral (ARV) treatment.

    He continues to promote his vitamins as an alternative to ARVs to South Africans with HIV through the SA National Civic Organisation.

    He apparently enjoys the protection of both Health Minister Manto Tshabalala-Msimang and her director-general, Thami Mseleku.

    Tshabalala-Msimang has refused to condemn Rath’s activities, while Mseleku recently intervened to release a consignment of Rath’s pills that had been seized by officials in Cape Town as they apparently contravened various regulations.

    The health department’s Charity Bhengu refused to comment on the matter.

    At the time of going to press, the Rath Foundation in South Africa had not responded to requests for comment.

  5. Truthseeker Says:

    Celia, surely the backing down by a medical journal of reputation is a big plus, since it endorses the probability that the rest of the world has been misreporting Rath, and opens people’s minds to the possibility of Rath being more than a crackpot and charlatan as readers had assumed, so they don’t swallow the smearing of the TAC and other hysterics. It wipes out preconceptions, while at the same time awakening open minded interest.

    No one sane really cares what the yellow press writes anyway.

  6. jspreen Says:

    The Matthias Rath/Dominik Feld case is Ryke Geerd Hamer/Olivia Pilhar revisited. Olivia Pilhar almost died in hospital after having been torn away from their parents who had put all their faith in Dr Hamer. The child was released after a dramatic and near fatal chemo treatment. Today, about ten years later, she’s alive and well. But, say doctors and main stream media, that’s only thanks to hospital treatment. Hamer is chased all over the place like a criminal.

    I’ve been watching “The Untouchables” last night. Medicine has become the Al Capone gang. How far are we ready to go ?

  7. Gene Semon Says:

    Answering the last question:

    Dr Rath’s micronutrient study is posted on his website as linked above and, of course, is subject to the review of any scientist who wants to legitimately knock him down. My bet is that it will withstand critical analysis.

    I happen to support his public statements; (sorry if this offends any Cheney-Rumsfeld-Rove-Bush supporters, but they have declared martial law, one disappearance at a time). If he’s made mistakes, this is inevitable when one assumes a leadership position.

    This study confirms the work of others (e.g. Roberto Giraldo) and leads to a no pharma solution to “AIDS” in developing countries (especially when you throw in sanitation, clean water, protein powders, green “superfoods”, etc); charitable foundations could initiate such programs.

    But this we now know would interfere with Mr. Gates’ investment strategies, (a surrogate for the global economy?).

    I’ve heard that if a cure for cancer was announced tomorrow, the economy would plunge into a depression due to the collapse of all interests “producing” disease management. The consequent devaluation of assets would be catastrophic and may explain the Gates and Clinton initiatives into Africa as an “opposite”, i.e. promoting economic expansion via the known and increasing values. All behind a facade of high ethics, which is why “denialists” are such persona non grata.

    Unfortunately, “alternative healthcare” may be a perceived risk to economic health, especially for the U.S.; (I hope this is wrong). The “gang” also has us behind the eight-ball in energy infrastructure and it’s more like Capone teaming up with everyone else since potential political solutions abound but never seem to get implemented.

    Until dissidents learn how to counteract “spin” and develop responsive political solutions beyond “left” and “right”, we will always be – like the Democrats – on the defensive.

    Sorry to be,

    Mr Gloom and Doom

  8. MacDonald Says:

    Mr. Gloom and Doom,

    I’m your second.

  9. Marcel Says:


    Hell yes, alternative health care is perceived as a risk to economic health of the mega corporations and the financiers behind them. That’s obvious.

    As for Dr. Rath, although I haven’t yet read all of this latest story about him, I do recall that someone, might have been Gene, a while back suggested that Rath’s newspaper ads were pretty crazy. I’d agree, they are, but I think it’s because he has no idea how to create an effective ad and comes across as a loony on a soapbox. (this from me, a former copywriter). It’s not because his heart isn’t in the right place. He needs professional help…not psychiatric but advertising.

    Also, based on something he said in an interview a few years back, he apparently sees through the phony “9-11” psyop and that’s very much to his credit.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Bad Behavior has blocked 1313 access attempts in the last 7 days.