<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Celia Farber fights back</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scienceguardian.com/blog/celia-farber-fights-back.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scienceguardian.com/blog/celia-farber-fights-back.htm</link>
	<description>Reviewing scientific paradigms and other general beliefs in the light of the scientific and professional literature</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 05:57:56 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Truthseeker</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceguardian.com/blog/celia-farber-fights-back.htm/comment-page-3#comment-8019</link>
		<dc:creator>Truthseeker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 18:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceguardian.com/blog/?p=1787#comment-8019</guid>
		<description>Dear Mr Todd,

There is no lunacy on this site, Sir, one reason being that it is devoted to exposing lunacy in others, such as those who subscribe to absurd and unsustainable paradigms as if they needed them to be true for psychological or pecuniary reasons.  Since it is our purpose and duty to carry on this work despite the self sacrifice it demands, we allow lunacy from time to time to enter its comment columns, in order to demonstrate its existence in regard to silly and entirely incredible conventional beliefs which have misled the otherwise reliable editors of the New York Times etc.

That was why we allowed the above series to stand rather than  cart it all off to the special section entitled &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scienceguardian.com/blog/drivel-from-pinheads-moved-from-celia-post&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;u&gt;Science Guardian Comment Troll Trap&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, where most of the nonsense purveyed by HIV paradigm defenders is instantly sent by the software we have implemented here, Troll Trapper (pat. pending).

Quite why the series suddenly halted when your extraordinary mind turned its attention elsewhere we have no idea.  But it was not the doing of Troll Trapper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mr Todd,</p>
<p>There is no lunacy on this site, Sir, one reason being that it is devoted to exposing lunacy in others, such as those who subscribe to absurd and unsustainable paradigms as if they needed them to be true for psychological or pecuniary reasons.  Since it is our purpose and duty to carry on this work despite the self sacrifice it demands, we allow lunacy from time to time to enter its comment columns, in order to demonstrate its existence in regard to silly and entirely incredible conventional beliefs which have misled the otherwise reliable editors of the New York Times etc.</p>
<p>That was why we allowed the above series to stand rather than  cart it all off to the special section entitled <a href="http://www.scienceguardian.com/blog/drivel-from-pinheads-moved-from-celia-post" rel="nofollow"><b><u>Science Guardian Comment Troll Trap</u></b></a>, where most of the nonsense purveyed by HIV paradigm defenders is instantly sent by the software we have implemented here, Troll Trapper (pat. pending).</p>
<p>Quite why the series suddenly halted when your extraordinary mind turned its attention elsewhere we have no idea.  But it was not the doing of Troll Trapper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jtdeshong</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceguardian.com/blog/celia-farber-fights-back.htm/comment-page-3#comment-8018</link>
		<dc:creator>jtdeshong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 13:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceguardian.com/blog/?p=1787#comment-8018</guid>
		<description>I took a much needed break from the lunacy of this site.
Michael Geiger, you are just an idiot.  
JTD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I took a much needed break from the lunacy of this site.<br />
Michael Geiger, you are just an idiot.<br />
JTD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MacDonald</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceguardian.com/blog/celia-farber-fights-back.htm/comment-page-3#comment-7340</link>
		<dc:creator>MacDonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 04:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceguardian.com/blog/?p=1787#comment-7340</guid>
		<description>Maria,

Did I not just tell you that Clark’s ways are mysterious? First you must get on your knees and understand what it is He has done for you, then you might be able to appreciate what He is now doing for all of Celia’s other supporters.

I can see you’re back on the drugs again because the real issue can’t both be why Clark didn’t recognise you and Celia Farber at the same time - unless of course you secretly wish that you were Celia Farber. Maria, are you trying to communicate that your underlying issue is vagina envy, and that you are yearning for the day when you no longer have to attempt to get pregnant through your ear, as was the case with your namesake (a unique case by all accounts. Don’t get your hopes up in that regard)?

If that so I will contact my good friends, Onan and Lector H. MD. They have a more liberal view of drugs, porn and the Immaculate Conception than I do, but they would be able to contact your mum in a professional capacity before the bricks get auctioned off.

Please advise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maria,</p>
<p>Did I not just tell you that Clark’s ways are mysterious? First you must get on your knees and understand what it is He has done for you, then you might be able to appreciate what He is now doing for all of Celia’s other supporters.</p>
<p>I can see you’re back on the drugs again because the real issue can’t both be why Clark didn’t recognise you and Celia Farber at the same time &#8211; unless of course you secretly wish that you were Celia Farber. Maria, are you trying to communicate that your underlying issue is vagina envy, and that you are yearning for the day when you no longer have to attempt to get pregnant through your ear, as was the case with your namesake (a unique case by all accounts. Don’t get your hopes up in that regard)?</p>
<p>If that so I will contact my good friends, Onan and Lector H. MD. They have a more liberal view of drugs, porn and the Immaculate Conception than I do, but they would be able to contact your mum in a professional capacity before the bricks get auctioned off.</p>
<p>Please advise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria angus</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceguardian.com/blog/celia-farber-fights-back.htm/comment-page-3#comment-7306</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria angus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceguardian.com/blog/?p=1787#comment-7306</guid>
		<description>MacDonald,

You are way, way off topic. How dare you bring up such filth? The issue is Clark Baker, and why it took him so long to figure out who I am! Every client of this so-called &quot;detective&quot; must now demand a refund!

Clark and I are opposites. He is a censor and a bully. I dare the so-called &quot;truthseeker&quot; to let readers of this blog read the truth! MacDonald, you must be Clark Baker on a drug holiday!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MacDonald,</p>
<p>You are way, way off topic. How dare you bring up such filth? The issue is Clark Baker, and why it took him so long to figure out who I am! Every client of this so-called &#8220;detective&#8221; must now demand a refund!</p>
<p>Clark and I are opposites. He is a censor and a bully. I dare the so-called &#8220;truthseeker&#8221; to let readers of this blog read the truth! MacDonald, you must be Clark Baker on a drug holiday!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

