In case it was not abundantly clear, these words:

More topics on which Bialyzebub has nothing of consequence to say as usual

Thank God maybe no more comments either under innumerable pseuds because you don’t have the sense or the spine to stand up and stand for anything other than your own navel.

Maybe you could spend the time learning to write in even more entertaining lively and comprehensible fashion so that those you purportedly support can be understood by the masses they need to topple their oppressors

were written by Truthseeker to me, in response to a subject heading text that read:

please whatever you do do not write a take on either of these ..it would be disastrous

and to which he twice replied in his unique (why would anyone want to imitate it) style by typing first: Picayune poison pen good riddance ,

followed by Re: Picayune drivel from the poison pen

So I ask you gentle late night readers of NAR, what can the bespotted TS possibly mean when he writes this to woolify your already bleary eyes?

we would hope he would keep his email rhetoric down to levels that will not frighten the children. Anyway, our mail software automatically blocks email that scores higher than three peppers, and his has been known to score 27. (clever device huh? Remind you of anyone with the initials JPM?)

To end on a more cheerful Bialyzebubbie note :: The very newest post follows along every one of my well described lines towards accomplishing the transformation I indicated above that the TS had been so reluctant to undertake. Just so you know, he sometimes does accept good advice, but seldom if ever acknowledges it, and often does the opposite as demonstrated here.

Nonetheless, hypercontinumm entities are entitled to a lot of leeway, especially when they appear to be on the side of the angels, if you get my meaning.

Gotta buzz now…other galaxies are calling.

Not when delivered in the poison pen mode our devilish correspondent affects with all comers indiscriminately. This sedate and uncombative blog insists on impeccable manners and discriminating taste in all who venture here, on the principle that only politesse allows the very finely adjusted brains here to think clearly and respond sensibly, since verbal heat buckles reason and results only in obscurity and incomprehensibility, as often evidenced in our correspondent’s otherwise presumably intelligent e-discourse.

Unless our correspondent is actually aiming at the effect of 9/11, which pancaked two towers and killed three thousand people, an act of terrorism and barbarity unmatched in the civilized world since Pol Pot, we would hope he would keep his email rhetoric down to levels that will not frighten the children. Anyway, our mail software automatically blocks email that scores higher than three peppers, and his has been known to score 27.

From time to time, I have attempted in various ways to enliven and otherwise meaningfully contribute to NAR, often using cyber-noms so that what I might write would stand independent of the author’s name (and what’s in one anyway, right?)

And sometimes I have emailed suggestions to TS about ways he might, in the view from above, elevate his weblog to a position where it is worthy of its high falutin rubric of examining the faith in the light of the literature, instead of reminding me of an HIV?AIDS dissident People’s Magazine.

These helpful suggestions are always received badly, and never taken.

Today, I called his attention to posts at DW and Hank’s that concern one of his favorite topics, and in my usual devilish way, did so by sternly warning him against publishing his own inimitable take on the item they each concern.

I find the contradictions contained in his response to this to be more than I can suffer in silence, and feel compelled to share them with you as I am sure TS in his constant quest for THE TRUTH would wish.

First I write to TS:

please whatever you do do not write a take on either of these ..it would be disastrous

http://barnesworld.blogs.com/barnes_world /2006/09/the_scientific_.html

http://deanesmay.com/posts/1158678497.shtml

TS replies:

From: TS

To: bialyzebub
Date: Sep 19, 2006 7:33 PM

Subject: Picayune poison pen good riddance Re: Picayune drivel from the poison pen Re: please whatever you do do not write a take on either of these ..it would be disastrous

More topics on which Bialyzebub has nothing of consequence to say as usual

Thank God maybe no more comments either under innumerable pseuds because you don’t have the sense or the spine to stand up and stand for anything other than your own navel.

Maybe you could spend the time learning to write in even more entertaining lively and comprehensible fashion so that those you purportedly support can be understood by the masses they need to topple their oppressors

As my friend George might write, My my.