Science Guardian

Truth, beauty and paradigm power in science and society

I am Nicolaus Copernicus, and I approve of this blog

News, views and reviews measured against professional literature in peer reviewed journals (adjusted for design flaws and bias), well researched books, authoritative encyclopedias (not the bowdlerized Wiki entries on controversial topics) and the investigative reporting and skeptical studies of courageous original thinkers among academics, philosophers, researchers, scholars, authors, filmmakers and journalists.

Supporting the right of exceptional minds to free speech, publication, media coverage and funding against the crowd prejudice, leadership resistance, monetary influences and internal professional politics of the paradigm wars of cancer, HIV(not)AIDS, evolution, global warming, cosmology, particle physics, macroeconomics, information technology, religions and cults, health, medicine, diet and nutrition.



Halton C. Arp wki/obit/txt/vds/txt/txt/bk/bk, Henry Bauer txt/blg/ blg/bks/bk/txt/bk/vd, John Beard bk, Harvey Bialy bk/bk/txt/txt/rdo/vd, John Bockris bio/txt/ltr/bk, Donald W. Braben, Peter Breggin ste/fb/col/bks, Darin Brown txt/txt/txt/txt/txt/vd, Giordano Bruno bk/bio/bio, Frank R. Buianouckas, Stanislav Burzynski mov, Erwin Chargaff bio/bk/bio/prs, James Chin bk/vd, Nicolaus Copernicus bk, Mark Craddock, Francis Crick vd, Paul Crutzen, Marie Curie, Rebecca Culshaw txt/bk, Roger Cunningham, Charles Darwin txts/bk, Erasmus Darwin txt//bk/txt/hse/bks, Peter Duesberg ste/ste/bk/txt/vd/vd, Freeman Dyson, Albert Einstein, Richard Feynman bio, John Fewster, Rosalind Franklin, Bernard Forscher tx, Galileo Galilei, Walter Gilbert vd, Goethe bio/bk/bio, Nicolas Gonzalez tlk/rec/stetxt/txt, Patricia Goodson txt/bk/bk, Alec Gordon, James Hansen, Etienne de Harven bk/txt/vd, Alfred Hassig intw/txt, Robert G. Houston txt, Steven Jonas vd, Edward Jenner txt, Benjamin Jesty, Adrian Kent vd, Thomas Kuhn, Fred Kummerow, Stefan Lanka txt/txt/vd, Serge Lang, John Lauritsen vd, Paul Lauterbur vd, Mark Leggett, Richard Lindzen, James Lovelock, Andrew Maniotis, Lynn Margulis, Barbara McClintock, Christi Meyer vd, George Miklos, Marco Mamone Capria, Peter Medawar, Luc Montagnier txt/txt/vd, Kary Mullis, Linus Pauling prs/vd/vd, Eric Penrose, Roger Penrose vd, Max Planck, Rainer Plaga, David Rasnick bio/vd/bk, Robert Root-Bernstein vd, Sherwood Rowland, Otto Rossler, Harry Rubin, Marco Ruggiero txt/txt/intw/vd, Bertrand Russell Carl Sagan vd, Erwin Schrodinger, Fred Singer, Barbara Starfield txt, Gordon Stewart txt/txt, Richard Strohman, Thomas Szasz, Nicola Tesla bio/bio, Charles Thomas intw/vd, Frank Tipler, James Watson vd/vd, Alfred Wegener vd, Edward O. Wilson vd.


Jad Adams bk, Marci Angell bk/txt/txt/txt, Clark Baker ste/txt/rdo/vd, James Blodgett, Tony Brown vd, Hiram Caton txt/txt/txt/bk/ste, Jonathan Collin ste , Marcus Cohen, David Crowe vd, Margaret Cuomo, Stephen Davis BK/BK,/rdo, Michael Ellner vd, Elizabeth Ely txt/txt/ste, Epicurus, Dean Esmay, Celia Farber bio/txt/txt/txt/vd, Jonathan Fishbein txt/txt/wk, T.C.Fry, Michael Fumento, Max Gerson txt, Charles Geshekter vd, Michael Geiger, Roberto Giraldo, David Healy txt, Bob Herbert, Mike Hersee ste/rdo, Neville Hodgkinson txt /vd, James P. Hogan, Richard Horton bio/vd/vd, Christopher Hitchens, Eric Johnson, Claus Jensen vd, Phillip Johnson, Coleman Jones vds, William Donald Kelley, Ernst T. Krebs Sr txt, Ernst T. Krebs Jr. txt,/bio/txt/txt/ltr, Paul Krugman, Brett Leung MOV/ste/txt/txt/tx+vd/txt, Katie Leishman, Anthony Liversidge blg/intv/intv/txt/txts/txt/intv/txt/vd/vd, Bruce Livesey txt, James W. Loewen, Frank Lusardi, Nathaniel Lehrman vd, Christine Maggiore bk/ste/rec/rdo/vd, Rouben Mamoulian txt/txt/txt/txt/txt/doc/flm/flm, Noreen Martin vd, Robert Maver txt/itw, Eric Merola MOV, Lady Mary Wortley Montagu, Michael Moore bio/MOV/MOV/MOV, Gordon Moran, Ralph Nader bk, Ralph Moss txt/blg/ste/bks, Gary Null /txt/rdo/vd, Dan Olmsted wki, Toby Ord vd, Charles Ortleb bk/txt/bk/intw/flm, Neenyah Ostrom bk, Dennis Overbye, Mehmet Dr Oz vd, Eleni Papadopulos-Eleopulos ste/vd, Maria Papagiannidou bk, Thomas Piketty bk/bk/bk/bk/bk/bk/bk/bk/bk/bk, Robert Pollin txt/vd/bk, Jon Rappoport bio/bk/bk/ste/bk/bk/vd, Janine Roberts bk/bk, Luis Sancho vd, Liam Scheff ste/txt/bk/bk/rdio/vd, John Scythes, Casper Schmidt txt/txt, Joan Shenton vd/vd, Joseph Sonnabend vd, John Stauber, David Steele, Joseph Stiglitz bk/txt, Will Storr rdo Wolfgang Streeck, James P. Tankersley ste, Gary Taubes vd, Mwizenge S. Tembo, John Tierney vd, Michael Tracey, Valendar Turner rec, Jesse Ventura bk, Michael Verney-Elliott bio/vds/vd, Voltaire, Walter Wagner, Andrew Weil vd, David Weinberger bio/bk/blg/blg/BK/bk/pds, Robert Willner bk/txt/txt/vd, Howard Zinn.

I am Albert Einstein, and I heartily approve of this blog, insofar as it seems to believe both in science and the importance of intellectual imagination, uncompromised by out of date emotions such as the impulse toward conventional religious beliefs, national aggression as a part of patriotism, and so on.   As I once remarked, the further the spiritual evolution of mankind advances, the more certain it seems to me that the path to genuine religiosity does not lie through the fear of life, and the fear of death, and blind faith, but through striving after rational knowledge.   Certainly the application of the impulse toward blind faith in science whereby authority is treated as some kind of church is to be deplored.  As I have also said, the only thing that ever interfered with my learning was my education. I am Freeman Dyson, and I approve of this blog, but would warn the author that life as a heretic is a hard one, since the ignorant and the half informed, let alone those who should know better, will automatically trash their betters who try to enlighten them with independent thinking, as I have found to my sorrow in commenting on "global warming" and its cures.
Many people would die rather than think – in fact, they do so. – Bertrand Russell.

The progress of science is strewn, like an ancient desert trail, with the bleached skeletons of discarded theories which once seemed to possess eternal life. - Arthur Koestler

One should as a rule respect public opinion in so far as is necessary to avoid starvation and to keep out of prison. – Bertrand Russell

Fraud and falsehood only dread examination. Truth invites it. - Samuel Johnson

A sudden bold and unexpected question doth many times surprise a man and lay him open. – Sir Francis Bacon (1561 – 1626)

He who knows only his own side of the case, knows little of that. – John Stuart Mill

Whenever you find that you are on the side of the majority, it is time to reform. – Mark Twain

Although science has led to the generally high living standards that most of the industrialized world enjoys today, the astounding discoveries underpinning them were made by a tiny number of courageous, out-of-step, visionary, determined, and passionate scientists working to their own agenda and radically challenging the status quo. – Donald W. Braben

An old error is always more popular than a new truth. — German Proverb

I am Richard Feynman and I approve of this blog

When even the brightest mind in our world has been trained up from childhood in a superstition of any kind, it will never be possible for that mind, in its maturity, to examine sincerely, dispassionately, and conscientiously any evidence or any circumstance which shall seem to cast a doubt upon the validity of that superstition. I doubt if I could do it myself. – Mark Twain

It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his income depends on his not understanding it. – Upton Sinclair

A clash of doctrines is not a disaster, but an opportunity. - Alfred North Whitehead

Fraud and falsehood only dread examination. Truth invites it. – Samuel Johnson

Man’s mind cannot grasp the causes of events in their completeness, but the desire to find those causes is implanted in man’s soul. And without considering the multiplicity and complexity of the conditions any one of which taken separately may seem to be the cause, he snatches at the first approximation to a cause that seems to him intelligible and says: “This is the cause!” – Leo Tolstoy

The evolution of the world tends to show the absolute importance of the category of the individual apart from the crowd. - Soren Kierkegaard

Who does not know the truth is simply a fool, yet who knows the truth and calls it a lie is a criminal. – Bertold Brecht

How easily the learned give up the evidence of their senses to preserve the coherence of ideas in their imagination. – Adam Smith

Education consists mainly in what we have unlearned. – Mark Twain

The mind likes a strange idea as little as the body likes a strange protein and resists it with similar energy. If we watch ourselves honestly, we shall often find that we have begun to argue against a new idea even before it has been completely stated. – Arthur Koestler

Whenever the human race assembles to a number exceeding four, it cannot stand free speech. – Mark Twain

People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices. - Adam Smith

There isn’t anything so grotesque or so incredible that the average human being can’t believe it. – Mark Twain

He who knows only his own side of the case, knows little of that. – John Stuart Mill

It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere. – Voltaire

People are generally better persuaded by the reasons which they have themselves discovered than by those which have come into the mind of others.- Blaise Pascal.

Illusion is the first of all pleasures. – Voltaire

The applause of a single human being is of great consequence. – Samuel Johnson

(Click for more Unusual Quotations on Science and Human Nature)

Important: This site is best viewed in LARGE FONT, and in Firefox for image title visibility (place cursor on pics to reveal comments) and layout display. Click the title of any post to get only that post and its Comments for printing. All posts guaranteed fact checked according to reference level cited, typically the original journal studies. Full guide to site purpose, layout and how to print posts out is in the lower blue section at the bottom of the home page.
---Admin AL/E/ILMK---

Crowds and Power explains much in AIDS science and politics

Leading AIDS political analyst and critic Celia Farber calls our attention to a fascinating literary work, one which fathoms the subterranean human emotions which surely account best for what is happening in the politically distorted paradigm dispute of HIV?AIDS.

Certainly anyone who assumes that the global endorsement and support of HIV=AIDS must mean it is correct should read Crowds and Power by Elias Canetti (Farrar Straus and Giroux, tr. 1984, originally 1960).

This unique and original book makes it clear how a bad idea might indeed be maintained through the behavior of the crowd of supporters it accumulates and grow more strongly entrenched over two decades, even though it is false, despite the best efforts of critics to expose and illuminate its fraudulent foundation.

For example, on page 71:

“The fact that wars can last so long, and may be carried on well after they have been lost, arises from the deep urge of the crowd to maintain itself in the acute stage; not to disintegrate; to remain a crowd. This feeling is sometimes so strong that people prefer to perish together with open eyes, rather than to acknowledge defeat and this experience the disintegration of their own crowd.”

Not as accessible and plainly stated as it could be, perhaps perforce given its literary approach, the book is an over the top extended riff of 495 pages on the theme of how crowds possess their own momentum and nature, with very little of it rational in motivation or thinking, and easily directed by tyrants, rabble rousers and other leaders.

Written in a hyperbolic style and intermittently loaded with historical examples which sound exaggerated and unlikely in their excesses, it is often difficult to assess how much truth there is in the Canetti’s endless pages of fantastical description of crowd behavior in war and other situations of conflict.

From the first pages, however, one can recognize truths which are seldom voiced, such as the way the normal fear and anxiety associated with strangers touching is converted in a crowd to the exact opposite, the feeling of security and comfort provided by being a member of a crowd where people press close upon each other, where proximity is a benefit and not a threat.

The initial difficulty readers might have is seeing how relevant and realistic the description of crowd behavior is in Crowds and Power may be partly due to the nature of the translation, which in general seems to sacrifice a tone of accuracy and credibility for literary excitement and flair. Without a comparison with the original it is impossible to tell for sure, however, and there is enough in the book that can be recognized as true and perceptive to suggest that any example of Canetti’s seemingly unrealistic description is likely to be profoundly perceptive, and seem unfamiliar precisely for this good reason, rather than because it is wrong. Canetti’s credentials include the Nobel Prize for Literature, which also speaks for the book’s emotional accuracy.

Certainly it speaks to anyone who contemplates the scene in HIV?AIDS. One of the remarkable aspects of the book is how often it seems to echo the irrational behavior of the mainstream crowd in AIDS, with its preference for the logically and scientifically unsustainable ideology of HIV=AIDS over the potential mental liberation of the reviewers and the review literature which says that there is much less danger than alleged ie that AIDS is non infectious, not inevitable and not even real as typically perceived and described, but instead a relabeling of familiar diseases in the framework of a fantasy.

Thus for an explanation of the ill mannered and bullying inability of the mainstream scientists and officials to respond coolly to objections to their theory see p 22:

“One of the most striking traits of the inner life of a crowd is the feeling of being persecuted, a peculiar angry sensitiveness and irritability directed against those it has once and forever nominated as enemies. These can behave in any manner, harsh or conciliatory, cold or sympathetic, severe or mild — whatever they do will be interpreted as springing from a malevolence, a premeditated intention to destroy the crowd openly, or by stealth.”

Anyone who reads this book and recognizes the relevance of its descriptions to the politics of AIDS will no longer be surprised that the reviewers in HIV?AIDS have over twenty years made absolutely no progress in tilting against the windmills of mainstream AIDS ideology, and instead seem only to contribute to the solidarity, certainty and inviolability of HIV=AIDS thinking of a crowd which presses ever more tightly together under what it views as a deadly attack.

When it comes to a showdown between logic and evidence, and crowd solidarity, there is no question which will prevail, and that is the lesson of Canetti’s book. Anyone who reads deeply into it will find nothing surprising in the fact that in HIV?AIDS, countervailing opinion and analysis has been crushed by the juggernaut of crowd behavior, certainly not when the size of the crowd of this paradigm’s followers is the greatest in the history of science to accumulate in support of an idea which claims no proof and has been thoroughly discredited in the top scientific literature.

The plain fact of the matter is that the misbegotten heart of the global HIV?AIDS affair is now found in the play on the political stage rather than the one acted out in the labs and periodicals of science, and the current scene only responds to analysis from a psychological and sociological perspective and not to scientific discussion. The roots of its unreality are in human nature, rather than scientific error, and any of the objective scientific critics of HIV are going to be vastly disappointed if they expect anyone in the crowd or leading the crowd to respond to logic and evidence.

To read Canetti is to understand that HIV?AIDS has always been a crowd phenomenon, rather than a scientific and medical matter, and the proper discussion is how to redirect it politically, before even contemplating how the debate about the truth of the matter can be returned to science where it belongs. Any attempt to bring reason and evidence to bear before that redirection is whistling in the wind.

One of the most telling points Canetti makes is to indicate how crowd behavior has a lot to do with fear of death in war. Both factors – death, and war – are obviously involved in the massive war on the deadly virus, of course, and on the second front of the war, against the HIV reviewers and revisionists in AIDS science and medicine. As Canetti forecasts these truth seekers are seen as nothing more than Quislings, traitors and enemy spies by the crowd they are trying to enlighten.

On page 75:

“The wish to see death is everywhere and one does not have to go deep into men to bring it to light.

The curious and unmistakable high tension which characterizes all the processes of war has two causes: people want to forestall death, and they are acting as a crowd. Without the latter element there is no chance whatsoever of success in the first. As long as the war lasts they must remain a crowd, and the war really ends as soon as they cease to be one. War offers the crowd the hope of a definite duration of life, and this is a considerable force in its popularity. It can be shown that the coherence and duration of wars in modern times is associated with the greatly increased size and density of the double crowds [one on each side] involved in them.”

The parallel between Canetti’s description and the international scene in AIDS is very easy to see. Death, fear, and the largest crowd possible – one of global proportions – add up to the end of truth in science, and all critics of HIV=AIDS should realize this.

One Response to “Crowds and Power explains much in AIDS science and politics”

  1. Frank Lusardi Says:

    “There is something fascinating about science. One gets such wholesale returns of conjecture out of such a trifling investment of fact” — Mark Twain

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Bad Behavior has blocked 1316 access attempts in the last 7 days.