Science Guardian

Paradigms and power in science and society

I am Nicolaus Copernicus, and I approve of this blog

I am Richard Feynman and I approve of this blogComparing mainstream claims in science and technology and received wisdom in society with the published record, we defend honest, accomplished, independent minded and often heroic scientists (Peter Duesberg, Serge Lang, Harvey Bialy, Kary Mullis, Henry Bauer, Jim Watson, Peter Medawar, Erwin Chargaff, Richard Feynman, Linus Pauling, James Hansen, Fred Singer, Richard Lindzer, Rainer Plaga, Otto Rossler, Michio Kaku, David Rasnick, Rebecca Culshaw, Ernst Krebs, Mark Leggett, Adrian Kent) and their good science against the censorship, mudslinging, false arguments, ad hominem propaganda, overwhelming group prejudice and internal science politics of the paradigm wars of cancer, HIV/AIDS, evolution, global warming, collider physics, health, medicine and nutrition, as well as from time to time promoting truth in personal technology by identifying items of genuinely high quality from those whose reputation is unjustly magnified in the media.

I am Galileo Galilei, and I approve of this blog, but wish to warn the author that it is unwise to get on the wrong side of the Pope by portraying him as a simpleton, as I did, although confinement to my villa wasn't too bad a punishment.I am Bertrand Russell and I approve of this blog for three reasons - because it is for science, because it is against against religion, and because it is especially against religious belief in any scientific paradigm. This publication aims to measure truth only by the professional and scholarly literature in peer reviewed journals, well researched books, and the investigative reporting and reviews of thoughtful and informed if often unconventional academics, philosophers, researchers, scholars, authors, and journalists (John Lauritsen, Celia Farber, Liam Scheff, Robert Houston, Claus Jensen, Anthony Liversidge, James Blodgett, Jim Tankersley, John Tierney, Bob Herbert, Dennis Overbye, Marcus Cohen, Gary Null, Walter Wagner, Luis Sancho, Toby Ord and Eric Johnson) too often scorned, shortchanged or damned by publicly irresponsible scientists and other authorities living off the status quo.

Thus we hope to combat the influence of the running dog lackeys of those in power who mislead in science and society, namely compliant media editors, unquestioning science reporters, ignorant publishers, fellow traveling pharma activists and other invested parties, and their misled congregation of patients, doctors, politicians, officials, charity workers, foundation staff, celebrities, bloggers and innocent members of the confused but trusting general public who may assume that leading scientists and other gurus are not subject to the laws of human nature, by which personal rewards and group goals can trump professional conscience and the public interest.

I am Carl Sagan, and I approve of this blog, because it encourages the lay person to practice the scientific method for himself,  and to double check the verbal claims of scientists, however prominent, against the published literature and common sense.  I myself wish that I had been less gullible when I was alive, for then I would not have taken the AIDS HIV claim at face value, and I might have saved myself from standard treatment for leukemia.   After all, I did stand up for marijuana and against the political prejudice and legal suppression which prevents all of us benefiting from its educational influence.I am Freeman Dyson, and I approve of this blog, but would warn the author that life as a heretic is a hard one, since the ignorant and the half informed, let alone those who should know better, will automatically trash their betters who try to enlighten them with independent thinking, as I have found to my sorrow in commenting on "global warming" and its cures. I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: “O Lord make my enemies ridiculous.” And God granted it. – Voltaire

Everything that one thinks about a lot becomes problematic. – Friedrich Nietzsche

A little inaccuracy sometimes saves tons of explanation. – Saki (H. H. Munro).

More Quotations on Science and Belief

Best viewed ONLY in LARGE font in current Safari or Firefox in Mac, and Firefox or Chrome in PC (IE displays all text bold). Display a single post and its comments for printout by clicking on its headline (printout won't include the scurrilous remarks appended to images which are briefly visible if the cursor is placed over them, repeat if necessary). All posts guaranteed fact checked according to reference level cited. Guide to blog purpose and layout is in the other blue section at the bottom of every home page.

(Incorporating New AIDS Review)

Harvard student finds spider to shake up arthropod community

Sea spiders with claws growing out of the front of their brains where only eyes are usually mounted have been discovered by a Harvard graduate student, Amy Maxmen. According to the Harvard news department this discovery is shaking up a basic assumption of this presumably tiny field. The reason for the “controversy” is not entirely clear from the report, but it apparently serves as a good example of how a young student has to be wary of reactions from her elders in advancing new knowledge that may force them to reconsider notions they have been wedded to for a long time.


The controversy is by no means a minor dispute waged in a gentle manner in the quiet halls of zoological museums. The two scientists mentioned earlier who commented on Maxmen’s report in Nature, Graham Budd of the University of Uppsala in Sweden and Maximilian Telford of University College London, put it this way: “The conclusions of Maxmen (and her collaborators) overturn entrenched ideas about the body plan of sea spiders, and, furthermore, lend support to some controversial theories of arthropod evolution. Unlike [true spiders], sea spiders lack a poisonous bite, but this paper is bound to inject venom into what is already one of the most controversial of zoological topics.”

Maxmen, who is bound to be at the center of the dispute, says, “Hopefully, criticism will be in the form of new research that our paper has helped to spark.”

That indeed is to be hoped and we join the hopeful Maxmen in her wary optimism.

Here is a picture of the irrationally evolved spider whose main significance to many will be as an example of how blind evolution works.

(show)

Harvard University Gazette

Harvard News Office

October 27, 2005

News

Science/Research

Latest scientific findings

sea spider

Amy Maxmen, a Harvard graduate student, found that species like Nymphon stormi have claws attached to and operated by the front of their brains. (Photo by Amy Maxmen)

A tale of a venomous dispute

How the spider got a head

By William J. Cromie

Harvard News Office

Living creatures have been found with claws growing out of the front of their brains. They are sea spiders netted off Hawaii by researchers from Harvard and the University of Hawaii.

The discovery adds to the lore of this obscure but bizarre and fascinating group of buglike beasts. They creep around shallow and deep parts of the oceans from warm tropical waters to frigid polar seas. They have bodies so slender that their stomach, intestines, and gonads must be squeezed into their thin legs. Males brood the eggs of their young in specialized arms.

Maxmen with specimens

Maxmen with some of the sea spiders she studies and a land-loving tarantula (second from right). (Staff photo Jon Chase/Harvard News Office)

Sea spiders as large as a foot across have been seen crawling along the deep ocean floor from the windows of submersible research vessels. Most of them, however, including those in this study, are a scant millimeter (.04 inch) in size. But big or small, they boast long snouts, on either side of which grow pincerlike claws.

Zoologists classify them as arthropods, a group that includes all the insects, land-loving spiders, and crustaceans from flea-size shrimp to lobsters. Together they make up the largest class of animals on Earth.

“In all other arthropods, the front section of the brain bears only eyes,” notes Amy Maxmen, 27, a Harvard graduate student who studies sea spiders for her Ph.D. thesis. “Our observation is the first ever of a clawlike appendage arising from that part of the brain. The finding supports assumptions by others that some ancestors of living arthropods once had a pair of pincers or antennae, along with their eyes, extending from the forward parts of their brains.”

“At first sight, this is a rather esoteric finding,” according to two scientists who commented on the discovery as it is reported in the Oct. 20 issue of the science journal Nature. “But if it is correct, it will shake up the field of arthropod evolution.”

“The evolutionary status of the front part of the brain has been a point of contention for a long time,” Maxmen notes. Prior to her study, no living arthropods had anything but eyes growing out of this part of the head. However, it appeared that some extinct arthropods did. Thus, sea spiders, rather than being odd, water-living relatives of ordinary house spiders, may be the only surviving relatives of arthropods who walked the oceans’ floors some 500 million years ago with appendages attached to the front of their heads. Fossils of such beasts reveal that many of them carried large, grasping or branched pincers that have become known as the “great appendage.”

sea spider

This is Anoplodactylus, the spider raised and studied by Amy Maxmen. It may be a previously undiscovered species. (Photo by Amy Maxmen)

According to the commentators, the exciting implication is that sea spiders “are extraordinary living fossils retaining an organization of their heads that all other living arthropods lost hundreds of millions of years ago.”

Headgear

Ordinary spiders, including those who decorate houses with their gossamer webs, also boast pincerlike fangs protruding from their heads, as do scorpions. Flies and other insects wave antennae from their heads. Crustaceans like horseshoe crabs and lobsters display a wide variety of clawed headdresses. But these arise from further back in the brain.

All arthropods are characterized by their segments, jointed parts extending up or down from tail to head. Lobsters, for example, boast segments with slender legs, powerful claws, and antennae. Even arthropod brains are segmented. All the dizzying variety of head antennae, claws, fangs, and pincers come from the second segment of the head. They are operated by nerves in that part of the brain. Only their eyes are innervated by the first segment. Sea spiders are the grand exception.

To zoologists, the segments and their attachments define the biology and evolution of this dominating group of creatures. “Scientists use information about the structure of segments and appendages, combined with an animal’s relationship to its near relatives, to try to understand what went on during evolution,” Maxmen explains. “We are confident that the antennae of flies, fangs of spiders, and claws of horseshoe crabs evolved from the same structure in a common ancestor. But sea spiders are unique; their closest relatives remain unknown. Are they primitive members of a group that includes horseshoe crabs and true spiders, or do they belong in a class of their own?”

That’s the question Maxmen and her collaborators tried to answer by looking at the brains of sea spiders and comparing them with other arthropods. To do so, she worked with Gonzalo Giribet, an associate professor in Harvard’s Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology. She did fieldwork at the University of Hawaii with William Browne and Mark Martindale. Browne says that he once saw large congregations of big, fleshy sea spiders, each nearly a foot long, crawling along the deep ocean floor.

Maxmen collected tiny male sea spiders, about one-twenty-fifth of an inch long, living in Kewalo Basin on Oahu. She took eggs from their arms and waited for them to hatch. Such larvae are a mere two thousandths of an inch in size.

After that, came the hard work. Maxmen had to find and trace the development of the nerves that operate their claws. With the help of molecule-size tags and a powerful laser microscope, she found that the nerves came from the first head segment, further forward than nerves that move the claws of true spiders and the appendages of their insect and crustacean cousins. This finding makes it doubtful that land and sea spiders are true sisters.

But the case is not closed. “Our research presents an important difference between sea spiders and land spiders,” Maxmen points out. “Now, additional studies comparing sea spiders to other arthropods are needed before the debate can be put to rest.”

The controversy is by no means a minor dispute waged in a gentle manner in the quiet halls of zoological museums. The two scientists mentioned earlier who commented on Maxmen’s report in Nature, Graham Budd of the University of Uppsala in Sweden and Maximilian Telford of University College London, put it this way: “The conclusions of Maxmen (and her collaborators) overturn entrenched ideas about the body plan of sea spiders, and, furthermore, lend support to some controversial theories of arthropod evolution. Unlike [true spiders], sea spiders lack a poisonous bite, but this paper is bound to inject venom into what is already one of the most controversial of zoological topics.”

Maxmen, who is bound to be at the center of the dispute, says, “Hopefully, criticism will be in the form of new research that our paper has helped to spark.”

Copyright 2005 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Bad Behavior has blocked 1097 access attempts in the last 7 days.