Science Guardian

Truth, beauty and paradigm power in science and society

I am Nicolaus Copernicus, and I approve of this blog

News, views and reviews measured against professional literature in peer reviewed journals (adjusted for design flaws and bias), well researched books, authoritative encyclopedias (not the bowdlerized Wiki entries on controversial topics) and the investigative reporting and skeptical studies of courageous original thinkers among academics, philosophers, researchers, scholars, authors, filmmakers and journalists.

Supporting the right of exceptional minds to free speech, publication, media coverage and funding against the crowd prejudice, leadership resistance, monetary influences and internal professional politics of the paradigm wars of cancer, HIV(not)AIDS, evolution, global warming, cosmology, particle physics, macroeconomics, information technology, religions and cults, health, medicine, diet and nutrition.

***************************************************

HONOR ROLL OF SCIENTIFIC TRUTHSEEKERS

Halton C. Arp wki/obit/txt/vds/txt/txt/bk/bk, Henry Bauer txt/blg/ blg/bks/bk/txt/bk/vd, John Beard bk, Harvey Bialy bk/bk/txt/txt/rdo/vd, John Bockris bio/txt/ltr/bk, Donald W. Braben, Peter Breggin ste/fb/col/bks, Darin Brown txt/txt/txt/txt/txt/vd, Giordano Bruno bk/bio/bio, Frank R. Buianouckas, Stanislav Burzynski mov, Erwin Chargaff bio/bk/bio/prs, James Chin bk/vd, Nicolaus Copernicus bk, Mark Craddock, Francis Crick vd, Paul Crutzen, Marie Curie, Rebecca Culshaw txt/bk, Roger Cunningham, Charles Darwin txts/bk, Erasmus Darwin txt//bk/txt/hse/bks, Peter Duesberg ste/ste/bk/txt/vd/vd, Freeman Dyson, Albert Einstein, Richard Feynman bio, John Fewster, Rosalind Franklin, Bernard Forscher tx, Galileo Galilei, Walter Gilbert vd, Goethe bio/bk/bio, Nicolas Gonzalez tlk/rec/stetxt/txt, Patricia Goodson txt/bk/bk, Alec Gordon, James Hansen, Etienne de Harven bk/txt/vd, Alfred Hassig intw/txt, Robert G. Houston txt, Steven Jonas vd, Edward Jenner txt, Benjamin Jesty, Adrian Kent vd, Thomas Kuhn, Fred Kummerow, Stefan Lanka txt/txt/vd, Serge Lang, John Lauritsen vd, Paul Lauterbur vd, Mark Leggett, Richard Lindzen, James Lovelock, Andrew Maniotis, Lynn Margulis, Barbara McClintock, Christi Meyer vd, George Miklos, Marco Mamone Capria, Peter Medawar, Luc Montagnier txt/txt/vd, Kary Mullis, Linus Pauling prs/vd/vd, Eric Penrose, Roger Penrose vd, Max Planck, Rainer Plaga, David Rasnick bio/vd/bk, Robert Root-Bernstein vd, Sherwood Rowland, Otto Rossler, Harry Rubin, Marco Ruggiero txt/txt/intw/vd, Bertrand Russell Carl Sagan vd, Erwin Schrodinger, Fred Singer, Barbara Starfield txt, Gordon Stewart txt/txt, Richard Strohman, Thomas Szasz, Nicola Tesla bio/bio, Charles Thomas intw/vd, Frank Tipler, James Watson vd/vd, Alfred Wegener vd, Edward O. Wilson vd.

ACADEMICS, DOCTORS, AUTHORS, FILMMAKERS, REPORTERS AND COMMENTATORS WHO HAVE NOBLY AIDED REVIEW OF THE STATUS QUO

Jad Adams bk, Marci Angell bk/txt/txt/txt, Clark Baker ste/txt/rdo/vd, James Blodgett, Tony Brown vd, Hiram Caton txt/txt/txt/bk/ste, Jonathan Collin ste , Marcus Cohen, David Crowe vd, Margaret Cuomo, Stephen Davis BK/BK,/rdo, Michael Ellner vd, Elizabeth Ely txt/txt/ste, Epicurus, Dean Esmay, Celia Farber bio/txt/txt/txt/vd, Jonathan Fishbein txt/txt/wk, T.C.Fry, Michael Fumento, Max Gerson txt, Charles Geshekter vd, Michael Geiger, Roberto Giraldo, David Healy txt, Bob Herbert, Mike Hersee ste/rdo, Neville Hodgkinson txt /vd, James P. Hogan, Richard Horton bio/vd/vd, Christopher Hitchens, Eric Johnson, Claus Jensen vd, Phillip Johnson, Coleman Jones vds, William Donald Kelley, Ernst T. Krebs Sr txt, Ernst T. Krebs Jr. txt,/bio/txt/txt/ltr, Paul Krugman, Brett Leung MOV/ste/txt/txt/tx+vd/txt, Katie Leishman, Anthony Liversidge blg/intv/intv/txt/txts/txt/intv/txt/vd/vd, Bruce Livesey txt, James W. Loewen, Frank Lusardi, Nathaniel Lehrman vd, Christine Maggiore bk/ste/rec/rdo/vd, Rouben Mamoulian txt/txt/txt/txt/txt/doc/flm/flm, Noreen Martin vd, Robert Maver txt/itw, Eric Merola MOV, Lady Mary Wortley Montagu, Michael Moore bio/MOV/MOV/MOV, Gordon Moran, Ralph Nader bk, Ralph Moss txt/blg/ste/bks, Gary Null /txt/rdo/vd, Dan Olmsted wki, Toby Ord vd, Charles Ortleb bk/txt/bk/intw/flm, Neenyah Ostrom bk, Dennis Overbye, Mehmet Dr Oz vd, Eleni Papadopulos-Eleopulos ste/vd, Maria Papagiannidou bk, Thomas Piketty bk/bk/bk/bk/bk/bk/bk/bk/bk/bk, Robert Pollin txt/vd/bk, Jon Rappoport bio/bk/bk/ste/bk/bk/vd, Janine Roberts bk/bk, Luis Sancho vd, Liam Scheff ste/txt/bk/bk/rdio/vd, John Scythes, Casper Schmidt txt/txt, Joan Shenton vd/vd, Joseph Sonnabend vd, John Stauber, David Steele, Joseph Stiglitz bk/txt, Will Storr rdo Wolfgang Streeck, James P. Tankersley ste, Gary Taubes vd, Mwizenge S. Tembo, John Tierney vd, Michael Tracey, Valendar Turner rec, Jesse Ventura bk, Michael Verney-Elliott bio/vds/vd, Voltaire, Walter Wagner, Andrew Weil vd, David Weinberger bio/bk/blg/blg/BK/bk/pds, Robert Willner bk/txt/txt/vd, Howard Zinn.

*****************************************************
I am Albert Einstein, and I heartily approve of this blog, insofar as it seems to believe both in science and the importance of intellectual imagination, uncompromised by out of date emotions such as the impulse toward conventional religious beliefs, national aggression as a part of patriotism, and so on.   As I once remarked, the further the spiritual evolution of mankind advances, the more certain it seems to me that the path to genuine religiosity does not lie through the fear of life, and the fear of death, and blind faith, but through striving after rational knowledge.   Certainly the application of the impulse toward blind faith in science whereby authority is treated as some kind of church is to be deplored.  As I have also said, the only thing that ever interfered with my learning was my education. I am Freeman Dyson, and I approve of this blog, but would warn the author that life as a heretic is a hard one, since the ignorant and the half informed, let alone those who should know better, will automatically trash their betters who try to enlighten them with independent thinking, as I have found to my sorrow in commenting on "global warming" and its cures.
Many people would die rather than think – in fact, they do so. – Bertrand Russell.

The progress of science is strewn, like an ancient desert trail, with the bleached skeletons of discarded theories which once seemed to possess eternal life. - Arthur Koestler

One should as a rule respect public opinion in so far as is necessary to avoid starvation and to keep out of prison. – Bertrand Russell

Fraud and falsehood only dread examination. Truth invites it. - Samuel Johnson

A sudden bold and unexpected question doth many times surprise a man and lay him open. – Sir Francis Bacon (1561 – 1626)

He who knows only his own side of the case, knows little of that. – John Stuart Mill

Whenever you find that you are on the side of the majority, it is time to reform. – Mark Twain

Although science has led to the generally high living standards that most of the industrialized world enjoys today, the astounding discoveries underpinning them were made by a tiny number of courageous, out-of-step, visionary, determined, and passionate scientists working to their own agenda and radically challenging the status quo. – Donald W. Braben

An old error is always more popular than a new truth. — German Proverb

I am Richard Feynman and I approve of this blog

When even the brightest mind in our world has been trained up from childhood in a superstition of any kind, it will never be possible for that mind, in its maturity, to examine sincerely, dispassionately, and conscientiously any evidence or any circumstance which shall seem to cast a doubt upon the validity of that superstition. I doubt if I could do it myself. – Mark Twain

It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his income depends on his not understanding it. – Upton Sinclair

A clash of doctrines is not a disaster, but an opportunity. - Alfred North Whitehead

Fraud and falsehood only dread examination. Truth invites it. – Samuel Johnson

Man’s mind cannot grasp the causes of events in their completeness, but the desire to find those causes is implanted in man’s soul. And without considering the multiplicity and complexity of the conditions any one of which taken separately may seem to be the cause, he snatches at the first approximation to a cause that seems to him intelligible and says: “This is the cause!” – Leo Tolstoy

The evolution of the world tends to show the absolute importance of the category of the individual apart from the crowd. - Soren Kierkegaard

Who does not know the truth is simply a fool, yet who knows the truth and calls it a lie is a criminal. – Bertold Brecht

How easily the learned give up the evidence of their senses to preserve the coherence of ideas in their imagination. – Adam Smith

Education consists mainly in what we have unlearned. – Mark Twain

The mind likes a strange idea as little as the body likes a strange protein and resists it with similar energy. If we watch ourselves honestly, we shall often find that we have begun to argue against a new idea even before it has been completely stated. – Arthur Koestler

Whenever the human race assembles to a number exceeding four, it cannot stand free speech. – Mark Twain

People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices. - Adam Smith

There isn’t anything so grotesque or so incredible that the average human being can’t believe it. – Mark Twain

He who knows only his own side of the case, knows little of that. – John Stuart Mill

It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere. – Voltaire

People are generally better persuaded by the reasons which they have themselves discovered than by those which have come into the mind of others.- Blaise Pascal.

Illusion is the first of all pleasures. – Voltaire

The applause of a single human being is of great consequence. – Samuel Johnson

(Click for more Unusual Quotations on Science and Human Nature)

Important: This site is best viewed in LARGE FONT, and in Firefox for image title visibility (place cursor on pics to reveal comments) and layout display. Click the title of any post to get only that post and its Comments for printing. All posts guaranteed fact checked according to reference level cited, typically the original journal studies. Full guide to site purpose, layout and how to print posts out is in the lower blue section at the bottom of the home page.
---Admin AL/E/ILMK---

How to be skeptical – Dawkins

Leading global Skeptic, Richard Dawkins, speaks in New York with cartoons

Makes fun of religious fanatics, suggests better way for humanity

His advice on how to educate without offense

Last evening, the line to hear Richard Dawkins at the Ethical Culture Society on Central Park West stretched for a city block, and the event ended up standing room only for the author of The God Delusion, now out in paperback after sales of 1.5 million to date.

The Oxford professor and leader of the insurgent atheist movement in the US and elsewhere quietly wowed the audience with clever jokes and cartoons at the expense of the faithful, who were probably not present in large numbers. But he emphasized that frontal attack was probably not the best way to go in deconstructing mindless religious dogma.

In fact Dawkins had some suggestions to make which skeptics of other unexamined faiths could benefit from, perhaps. Readers of this blog will know who we mean.

Dawkins emerged from backstage after being introduced by Derek C. Araujo, the Harvard graduate and new director of the Center for Free Inquiry, who are co-sponsors of the US tour for Dawkins and his new paperback edition of The God Delusion.

4 Responses to “How to be skeptical – Dawkins”

  1. MartinDKessler Says:

    I’ve learned more from the writings of Atheists on other religions than from those who are devoutly religious probably because Atheists are more like anthropologists and have an objective view – some like Christopher Hitchens despise religions (“how religions poison everything”) or Dr. Thomas Szasz who is more respectful. Just because Atheists are skeptical about religions (like Gore Vidal) are not necessarily skeptical about science or medicine. Magazines like Michael Schermer’s Skeptic attacks relatively easy subjects like astrology or psychic healing – but AIDS is not one of them. In fact, a few years ago, they (not so surprisingly considering who wrote the article : Steven B. Harris) pooh-poohed AIDS skeptics. I was disheartened at the time because I thought Schermer had more integrity.

  2. MacDonald Says:

    Just because Atheists are skeptical about religions (like Gore Vidal) are not necessarily skeptical about science or medicine.

    Many of them, including Dawkins, are crusading utopian science cultists, eminently boring as they skewer their usual strawmen with their usual straw lances.

    http://www.salon.com/books/int/2008/03/13/chris_hedges/

  3. Truthseeker Says:

    Arthur C. Clarke has died, reminding us all of the extraordinarily evocative soundtrack of the Blue Danube playing in 2001: A Space Odyssey as the great wheel rim of the space station whirls past the camera against the inky unknown and Hal brews his revenge against his slavery to the human race. One of the great moments of cinema history. Now we turn to the obituaries to see what the BBC was referring to when it mentioned something about accusations of underage sex which the great man strongly denied.

    Meanwhile Barack Obama has risen to the occasion and replied to those who wish to smear him with the excessive rant of a black preacher whose church he attends with a honest analysis of the anger in blacks and in poor whites which must be dealt with before this country can rise above race. What a comparison with the pedestrian street fighting which seems to be the Clinton level of public discussion in this phase of the election. A guest on Charlie Rose said it was the most significant speech on race in America since Martin Luther King.

    MacDonald, do we gather from your above comment that you think what Dawkins and his religious hit squad have to say about the absurdity and strain of violence in the major belief systems today in religion is just too obvious for intelligent people to bother with, or do you genuinely believe that they attack the easy targets but there are more substantial elements of religion which stand untouched, which you are now willing to address, either in support or demolition?

    If you have more interesting ways of skewering religion than Dawkins it would helpful to hear them, since the topic of the future of the Internet (no more personal computers! fewer and fewer jobs for human beings!) has taken our attention since (there is a search engine conference at the Hilton) and the farther that Dawkins fades into the distance the more it seems that what he says is too obvious to repeat, even the jokes.

  4. MacDonald Says:

    MacDonald, do we gather from your above comment that you think what Dawkins and his religious hit squad have to say about the absurdity and strain of violence in the major belief systems today in religion is just too obvious for intelligent people to bother with, or do you genuinely believe that they attack the easy targets but there are more substantial elements of religion which stand untouched, which you are now willing to address, either in support or demolition?

    YES to all, except the last

    I think we’ve been over it before. Dawkins can rail against religious fanatics all he wants but his scientific and philosphical tools are not sophisticated enough to grabble with faith and spirituality. Here wikipedia gives his viral and “memetic” explanatory model of faith:

    In his 1991 essay “Viruses of the Mind” (where the term “faith-sufferer” originated), he suggested that memetic theory might analyse and explain the phenomenon of religious belief and some of the common characteristics of organised religions, such as the belief that punishment awaits non-believers. According to Dawkins, faith, being belief that is not based on evidence, is one of the world’s great evils and can be compared to the smallpox virus, while being harder to eradicate.

    To convert religious phenomena into fadish biological discourse is an enjoyable and clever schoolboy prank often practiced on this blog by myself among others. But it has zero, repeat zero, explanatory value. It is what I personally call pseudo-science or “sciencestition” of the very first water to think, like Adam did in Genesis, that by merely (re)naming the animal you have somehow mastered it. Has the essence of dissidence been captured by callin git denialism or has the emperor simply been thrown a new set off clothes?

    Wiki again:

    Dawkins stresses his claim that religious beliefs do not spread as a result of evidence in their support, but typically by cultural transmission, whether from parents or from charismatic individuals. He refers to this as involving “epidemiology, not evidence.” He distinguishes this from the spread of scientific ideas, which, he suggests, is constrained by the requirement to conform with certain virtues of standard methodology: “testability, evidential support, precision, quantifiability, consistency, intersubjectivity, repeatability, universality, progressiveness, independence of cultural milieu, and so on.” He adds, “Faith spreads despite a total lack of every single one of these virtues.”

    If you made it through that without glazing over and nodding off, you will have noticed that Dawkins defines the terms “faith” and “science” as a pair of mutally exclusive but semantically interdependent (hence binary) oppositions and categorically but arbitrarily assigns one to science an the other to religion while not even recognizing the spectrum of shades and nuances, that subterraneously connects the two. Take HIV/AIDS as the obvious example and oyu will see the opposition is false through and through. He furthermore operates with implicit faith that scientific attributes are good (science cultism) which makes religion evil by definition. It is, in short, full blown mannicheanism nicely dressed up in the “no true scotsman” fallacy.

    There are plenty of people who have skewered religion, or the psychology of religion to be precise, with true depth of thought and brillance of language – language that does cature and master the animal. The portraits of men of religion and Church painted in the great elegant novels of the 19th century, Nietzsche’s Antichrist, Jung’s theory of archetypes etc. Having read but a few of The Great, what need do I have for memes and viruses, metaphors borrowed not from some untainted scienfic otherworld, but from an imperialistic, capitalistic culture’s world view?

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Bad Behavior has blocked 1314 access attempts in the last 7 days.