<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: John P. Moore Brings Down the AIDS Paradigm (Part I)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scienceguardian.com/blog/john-moore-explodes.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scienceguardian.com/blog/john-moore-explodes.htm</link>
	<description>Reviewing scientific paradigms and other general beliefs in the light of the scientific and professional literature</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 05:57:56 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Truthseeker</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceguardian.com/blog/john-moore-explodes.htm/comment-page-1#comment-4714</link>
		<dc:creator>Truthseeker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 05:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paradigmoverthrow.com/blog/john-moore-explodes.htm#comment-4714</guid>
		<description>Well, let&#039;s not go overboard here, MacD, we didn&#039;t mean to suggest that we don&#039;t recognize the truth in what you say, we were merely adopting a statistical perspective for balance. Even those who love women dearly as a race and a phenomenon have to admit that the times we have a rational and well reasoned conversation with these marvelous beings are few and far between. We put this down to the problem of statistical overlap also - the number of women who are attractive enough to listen to being few, and the number of them who are intelligent being fewer, it is hard to find both in one person outside the leading institutions of scholarship and learning who seem to make attractiveness a criterion of acceptance once they have a large number of applicants, even though it has nothing to do with intelligence as far as we know - but there is also the problem that women have a marvelous way of integrating the world into a kind of unity, so that they are unable to see it from any other point of view than their own. 

This is why they are more often religious, we imagine, since once having adopted some kind of all-encompassing ideology it is almost impossible for them to step aside and examine it for sense.  The fact that some can do this, especially if they are also  very attractive and intelligent, is what makes the existence of Rebecca Culshaw, whose book is considered by many now the first thing to hand to someone asking about the HIVâˆ«AIDS paradigm challenge, a marvel to behold and a reason to kneel and thank the God of Truth.  We particularly admire such people, as we have made clear in the past, even though we have been deplored as insufficiently PC. We wish we knew more examples, but we can&#039;t think of any, except the Polgar sisters who have reached such prominence in world chess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, let&#8217;s not go overboard here, MacD, we didn&#8217;t mean to suggest that we don&#8217;t recognize the truth in what you say, we were merely adopting a statistical perspective for balance. Even those who love women dearly as a race and a phenomenon have to admit that the times we have a rational and well reasoned conversation with these marvelous beings are few and far between. We put this down to the problem of statistical overlap also &#8211; the number of women who are attractive enough to listen to being few, and the number of them who are intelligent being fewer, it is hard to find both in one person outside the leading institutions of scholarship and learning who seem to make attractiveness a criterion of acceptance once they have a large number of applicants, even though it has nothing to do with intelligence as far as we know &#8211; but there is also the problem that women have a marvelous way of integrating the world into a kind of unity, so that they are unable to see it from any other point of view than their own. </p>
<p>This is why they are more often religious, we imagine, since once having adopted some kind of all-encompassing ideology it is almost impossible for them to step aside and examine it for sense.  The fact that some can do this, especially if they are also  very attractive and intelligent, is what makes the existence of Rebecca Culshaw, whose book is considered by many now the first thing to hand to someone asking about the HIVâˆ«AIDS paradigm challenge, a marvel to behold and a reason to kneel and thank the God of Truth.  We particularly admire such people, as we have made clear in the past, even though we have been deplored as insufficiently PC. We wish we knew more examples, but we can&#8217;t think of any, except the Polgar sisters who have reached such prominence in world chess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MacDonald</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceguardian.com/blog/john-moore-explodes.htm/comment-page-1#comment-4713</link>
		<dc:creator>MacDonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 19:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paradigmoverthrow.com/blog/john-moore-explodes.htm#comment-4713</guid>
		<description>Damn! I thought I could smuggle a misogynist comment in there under cover of all the gentlemanry and perhaps get to see my name in red ink on JP&#039;s PC blog. But I guess nothing gets by our host when it comes to the fair, intelligent and increasingly powerful sex.

I have been a scoundrel, I own it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn! I thought I could smuggle a misogynist comment in there under cover of all the gentlemanry and perhaps get to see my name in red ink on JP&#8217;s PC blog. But I guess nothing gets by our host when it comes to the fair, intelligent and increasingly powerful sex.</p>
<p>I have been a scoundrel, I own it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Truthseeker</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceguardian.com/blog/john-moore-explodes.htm/comment-page-1#comment-4712</link>
		<dc:creator>Truthseeker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 14:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paradigmoverthrow.com/blog/john-moore-explodes.htm#comment-4712</guid>
		<description>Sir, you are slighting the very name of Woman, and founding your view, we believe, on a statistical  error known as pre-selection, since you are overlooking the fact that all intelligent men (those that read this blog, for example) have little to do with women who are not supremely attractive to them, other than their sisters etc, and this is not a random sample by any means.  In fact, if they troubled to pay some attention to women on some other parameter, they would multiply by at least one order of magnitude the number who had something else to offer. Selecting out just those who one finds personally attractive is not a random sample, and results very often in not very much being offered other than the temporary delights of carnal paradise, and what is more the analysis is complicated by the fact that women who do not return the compliment will offer very little, and also may be booked, and therefore out of the game.  The number from this overall sample who will have something else to offer will naturally be exceedingly low.

If however we broaden our selection to include all intelligent women, mutually attractive or not, we find a cornucopia of talent beneath the surface in almost every case.  Any European should know this, surely. In particular, women are masters of the social universe, since they naturally have a very good memory for faces, and spend much of their time thinking about people and their hidden motives.  As we understand it, it is only the enlightened disinterest they have in gaining personal power which prevents them from ruling the business and political universe. As civilization advances, and male violence is brought under control, we predict that they will eventually rule most countries and most large corporations.  This is already evident in the number of female leaders of nations that have emerged in the last few years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sir, you are slighting the very name of Woman, and founding your view, we believe, on a statistical  error known as pre-selection, since you are overlooking the fact that all intelligent men (those that read this blog, for example) have little to do with women who are not supremely attractive to them, other than their sisters etc, and this is not a random sample by any means.  In fact, if they troubled to pay some attention to women on some other parameter, they would multiply by at least one order of magnitude the number who had something else to offer. Selecting out just those who one finds personally attractive is not a random sample, and results very often in not very much being offered other than the temporary delights of carnal paradise, and what is more the analysis is complicated by the fact that women who do not return the compliment will offer very little, and also may be booked, and therefore out of the game.  The number from this overall sample who will have something else to offer will naturally be exceedingly low.</p>
<p>If however we broaden our selection to include all intelligent women, mutually attractive or not, we find a cornucopia of talent beneath the surface in almost every case.  Any European should know this, surely. In particular, women are masters of the social universe, since they naturally have a very good memory for faces, and spend much of their time thinking about people and their hidden motives.  As we understand it, it is only the enlightened disinterest they have in gaining personal power which prevents them from ruling the business and political universe. As civilization advances, and male violence is brought under control, we predict that they will eventually rule most countries and most large corporations.  This is already evident in the number of female leaders of nations that have emerged in the last few years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MacDonald</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceguardian.com/blog/john-moore-explodes.htm/comment-page-1#comment-4711</link>
		<dc:creator>MacDonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 11:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paradigmoverthrow.com/blog/john-moore-explodes.htm#comment-4711</guid>
		<description>Alas, that precious and much coveted gift by its very nature will often seem quite ordinary to the receiver once received, especially when he discovers that more was given than bargained for, and that more than bargained for is usually demanded in return. 

Still no degree of post-coital disgust should ever induce a man to slight what he has just received, precious or not, for the simple reason that few women have anything else to offer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alas, that precious and much coveted gift by its very nature will often seem quite ordinary to the receiver once received, especially when he discovers that more was given than bargained for, and that more than bargained for is usually demanded in return. </p>
<p>Still no degree of post-coital disgust should ever induce a man to slight what he has just received, precious or not, for the simple reason that few women have anything else to offer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

