It’s one of the strongest indications that Perth is right in suspecting “HIV” is a composite, a lab artifact, rather than a single self-identical entity.

Indeed, it is rather hard to understand why almost anything is not a vaccine, since anything+Virus = antibodies = reducti/on of Virus to vanishingly low levels.

Perhaps one should get funding from the NIAID to develop beer as a vaccine, since beer+Virus=antibodies=reduction of Virus to vanishing point. Perhaps that would be considered too facetious, so one could suggest MSG, perhaps? This would presumably be welcome to Chinese restaurants in the forthcoming recessionary economy.

Thai curry might be a good alternative, since the Thais not only know how to cook delightfully as noted above but curry is particularly good for the synapses in the brain, which is why India has a population of well over one billion but not one of them, we understand, has Alzheimers.

The only thing I could tell from the article about how the “scientists” determined “infectiion” was using a Viral Load Test. They’ve been chasing a vaccine for 20 years and not surprisingly to me have come up with bupkis. The question I have is don’t you have to have a virus to have a vaccine? A letter to the Post would probably never be printed from a dissident point of view much less paid attention to.

That’s why (-: The Thais will also endlessly re-elect whoever screws them hard enough, while feeling might clever about it.

The story of the train is in all likelihood that in a crowded city like Bangkok it’s the only available space not owned by anybody. So the low-income Thais, always looking for a cheap or
free-of-charge solution, put up their sheds and markets around the railway. Since nature abhors a vacuum and poor people are much more sociable than wealthy people – in fact wealth can be measured by the distance one keeps to one’s fellow human beings (and trains) – it’s only natural for them to crowd.