Science Guardian

Truth, beauty and paradigm power in science and society

I am Nicolaus Copernicus, and I approve of this blog

News, views and reviews measured against professional literature in peer reviewed journals (adjusted for design flaws and bias), well researched books, authoritative encyclopedias (not the bowdlerized Wiki entries on controversial topics) and the investigative reporting and skeptical studies of courageous original thinkers among academics, philosophers, researchers, scholars, authors, filmmakers and journalists.

Supporting the right of exceptional minds to free speech, publication, media coverage and funding against the crowd prejudice, leadership resistance, monetary influences and internal professional politics of the paradigm wars of cancer, HIV(not)AIDS, evolution, global warming, cosmology, particle physics, macroeconomics, information technology, religions and cults, health, medicine, diet and nutrition.

***************************************************

HONOR ROLL OF SCIENTIFIC TRUTHSEEKERS

Halton C. Arp wki/obit/txt/vds/txt/txt/bk/bk, Henry Bauer txt/blg/ blg/bks/bk/txt/bk/vd, John Beard bk, Harvey Bialy bk/bk/txt/txt/rdo/vd, John Bockris bio/txt/ltr/bk, Donald W. Braben, Peter Breggin ste/fb/col/bks, Darin Brown txt/txt/txt/txt/txt/vd, Giordano Bruno bk/bio/bio, Frank R. Buianouckas, Stanislav Burzynski mov, Erwin Chargaff bio/bk/bio/prs, James Chin bk/vd, Nicolaus Copernicus bk, Mark Craddock, Francis Crick vd, Paul Crutzen, Marie Curie, Rebecca Culshaw txt/bk, Roger Cunningham, Charles Darwin txts/bk, Erasmus Darwin txt//bk/txt/hse/bks, Peter Duesberg ste/ste/bk/txt/vd/vd, Freeman Dyson, Albert Einstein, Richard Feynman bio, John Fewster, Rosalind Franklin, Bernard Forscher tx, Galileo Galilei, Walter Gilbert vd, Goethe bio/bk/bio, Nicolas Gonzalez tlk/rec/stetxt/txt, Patricia Goodson txt/bk/bk, Alec Gordon, James Hansen, Etienne de Harven bk/txt/vd, Alfred Hassig intw/txt, Robert G. Houston txt, Steven Jonas vd, Edward Jenner txt, Benjamin Jesty, Adrian Kent vd, Thomas Kuhn, Fred Kummerow, Stefan Lanka txt/txt/vd, Serge Lang, John Lauritsen vd, Paul Lauterbur vd, Mark Leggett, Richard Lindzen, James Lovelock, Andrew Maniotis, Lynn Margulis, Barbara McClintock, Christi Meyer vd, George Miklos, Marco Mamone Capria, Peter Medawar, Luc Montagnier txt/txt/vd, Kary Mullis, Linus Pauling prs/vd/vd, Eric Penrose, Roger Penrose vd, Max Planck, Rainer Plaga, David Rasnick bio/vd/bk, Robert Root-Bernstein vd, Sherwood Rowland, Otto Rossler, Harry Rubin, Marco Ruggiero txt/txt/intw/vd, Bertrand Russell Carl Sagan vd, Erwin Schrodinger, Fred Singer, Barbara Starfield txt, Gordon Stewart txt/txt, Richard Strohman, Thomas Szasz, Nicola Tesla bio/bio, Charles Thomas intw/vd, Frank Tipler, James Watson vd/vd, Alfred Wegener vd, Edward O. Wilson vd.

ACADEMICS, DOCTORS, AUTHORS, FILMMAKERS, REPORTERS AND COMMENTATORS WHO HAVE NOBLY AIDED REVIEW OF THE STATUS QUO

Jad Adams bk, Marci Angell bk/txt/txt/txt, Clark Baker ste/txt/rdo/vd, James Blodgett, Tony Brown vd, Hiram Caton txt/txt/txt/bk/ste, Jonathan Collin ste , Marcus Cohen, David Crowe vd, Margaret Cuomo, Stephen Davis BK/BK,/rdo, Michael Ellner vd, Elizabeth Ely txt/txt/ste, Epicurus, Dean Esmay, Celia Farber bio/txt/txt/txt/vd, Jonathan Fishbein txt/txt/wk, T.C.Fry, Michael Fumento, Max Gerson txt, Charles Geshekter vd, Michael Geiger, Roberto Giraldo, David Healy txt, Bob Herbert, Mike Hersee ste/rdo, Neville Hodgkinson txt /vd, James P. Hogan, Richard Horton bio/vd/vd, Christopher Hitchens, Eric Johnson, Claus Jensen vd, Phillip Johnson, Coleman Jones vds, William Donald Kelley, Ernst T. Krebs Sr txt, Ernst T. Krebs Jr. txt,/bio/txt/txt/ltr, Paul Krugman, Brett Leung MOV/ste/txt/txt/tx+vd/txt, Katie Leishman, Anthony Liversidge blg/intv/intv/txt/txts/txt/intv/txt/vd/vd, Bruce Livesey txt, James W. Loewen, Frank Lusardi, Nathaniel Lehrman vd, Christine Maggiore bk/ste/rec/rdo/vd, Rouben Mamoulian txt/txt/txt/txt/txt/doc/flm/flm, Noreen Martin vd, Robert Maver txt/itw, Eric Merola MOV, Lady Mary Wortley Montagu, Michael Moore bio/MOV/MOV/MOV, Gordon Moran, Ralph Nader bk, Ralph Moss txt/blg/ste/bks, Gary Null /txt/rdo/vd, Dan Olmsted wki, Toby Ord vd, Charles Ortleb bk/txt/bk/intw/flm, Neenyah Ostrom bk, Dennis Overbye, Mehmet Dr Oz vd, Eleni Papadopulos-Eleopulos ste/vd, Maria Papagiannidou bk, Thomas Piketty bk/bk/bk/bk/bk/bk/bk/bk/bk/bk, Robert Pollin txt/vd/bk, Jon Rappoport bio/bk/bk/ste/bk/bk/vd, Janine Roberts bk/bk, Luis Sancho vd, Liam Scheff ste/txt/bk/bk/rdio/vd, John Scythes, Casper Schmidt txt/txt, Joan Shenton vd/vd, Joseph Sonnabend vd, John Stauber, David Steele, Joseph Stiglitz bk/txt, Will Storr rdo Wolfgang Streeck, James P. Tankersley ste, Gary Taubes vd, Mwizenge S. Tembo, John Tierney vd, Michael Tracey, Valendar Turner rec, Jesse Ventura bk, Michael Verney-Elliott bio/vds/vd, Voltaire, Walter Wagner, Andrew Weil vd, David Weinberger bio/bk/blg/blg/BK/bk/pds, Robert Willner bk/txt/txt/vd, Howard Zinn.

*****************************************************
I am Albert Einstein, and I heartily approve of this blog, insofar as it seems to believe both in science and the importance of intellectual imagination, uncompromised by out of date emotions such as the impulse toward conventional religious beliefs, national aggression as a part of patriotism, and so on.   As I once remarked, the further the spiritual evolution of mankind advances, the more certain it seems to me that the path to genuine religiosity does not lie through the fear of life, and the fear of death, and blind faith, but through striving after rational knowledge.   Certainly the application of the impulse toward blind faith in science whereby authority is treated as some kind of church is to be deplored.  As I have also said, the only thing that ever interfered with my learning was my education. I am Freeman Dyson, and I approve of this blog, but would warn the author that life as a heretic is a hard one, since the ignorant and the half informed, let alone those who should know better, will automatically trash their betters who try to enlighten them with independent thinking, as I have found to my sorrow in commenting on "global warming" and its cures.
Many people would die rather than think – in fact, they do so. – Bertrand Russell.

The progress of science is strewn, like an ancient desert trail, with the bleached skeletons of discarded theories which once seemed to possess eternal life. - Arthur Koestler

One should as a rule respect public opinion in so far as is necessary to avoid starvation and to keep out of prison. – Bertrand Russell

Fraud and falsehood only dread examination. Truth invites it. - Samuel Johnson

A sudden bold and unexpected question doth many times surprise a man and lay him open. – Sir Francis Bacon (1561 – 1626)

He who knows only his own side of the case, knows little of that. – John Stuart Mill

Whenever you find that you are on the side of the majority, it is time to reform. – Mark Twain

Although science has led to the generally high living standards that most of the industrialized world enjoys today, the astounding discoveries underpinning them were made by a tiny number of courageous, out-of-step, visionary, determined, and passionate scientists working to their own agenda and radically challenging the status quo. – Donald W. Braben

An old error is always more popular than a new truth. — German Proverb

I am Richard Feynman and I approve of this blog

When even the brightest mind in our world has been trained up from childhood in a superstition of any kind, it will never be possible for that mind, in its maturity, to examine sincerely, dispassionately, and conscientiously any evidence or any circumstance which shall seem to cast a doubt upon the validity of that superstition. I doubt if I could do it myself. – Mark Twain

It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his income depends on his not understanding it. – Upton Sinclair

A clash of doctrines is not a disaster, but an opportunity. - Alfred North Whitehead

Fraud and falsehood only dread examination. Truth invites it. – Samuel Johnson

Man’s mind cannot grasp the causes of events in their completeness, but the desire to find those causes is implanted in man’s soul. And without considering the multiplicity and complexity of the conditions any one of which taken separately may seem to be the cause, he snatches at the first approximation to a cause that seems to him intelligible and says: “This is the cause!” – Leo Tolstoy

The evolution of the world tends to show the absolute importance of the category of the individual apart from the crowd. - Soren Kierkegaard

Who does not know the truth is simply a fool, yet who knows the truth and calls it a lie is a criminal. – Bertold Brecht

How easily the learned give up the evidence of their senses to preserve the coherence of ideas in their imagination. – Adam Smith

Education consists mainly in what we have unlearned. – Mark Twain

The mind likes a strange idea as little as the body likes a strange protein and resists it with similar energy. If we watch ourselves honestly, we shall often find that we have begun to argue against a new idea even before it has been completely stated. – Arthur Koestler

Whenever the human race assembles to a number exceeding four, it cannot stand free speech. – Mark Twain

People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices. - Adam Smith

There isn’t anything so grotesque or so incredible that the average human being can’t believe it. – Mark Twain

He who knows only his own side of the case, knows little of that. – John Stuart Mill

It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere. – Voltaire

People are generally better persuaded by the reasons which they have themselves discovered than by those which have come into the mind of others.- Blaise Pascal.

Illusion is the first of all pleasures. – Voltaire

The applause of a single human being is of great consequence. – Samuel Johnson

(Click for more Unusual Quotations on Science and Human Nature)

Important: This site is best viewed in LARGE FONT, and in Firefox for image title visibility (place cursor on pics to reveal comments) and layout display. Click the title of any post to get only that post and its Comments for printing. All posts guaranteed fact checked according to reference level cited, typically the original journal studies. Full guide to site purpose, layout and how to print posts out is in the lower blue section at the bottom of the home page.
---Admin AL/E/ILMK---

Naples conference speakers find merit in scientific heresies

This week (Thur Oct 20-Sat Oct 22) sees the third Science and Democracy Conference in Naples. The unique biannual meeting examines worthy current paradigm challenges in science, typically concluding that evidence has not been objectively assessed by the powers that be.

The conferences are organized by Marco Mamone Capria, a mathematician and physicist from Perugia who believes that the Kuhnian process, whereby paradigms are toppled in science only after their replacements are tested by strong resistance, has become distorted under modern conditions, with political and economic power playing undeserved roles.

Contributors of papers to this round of talks held in the Palazzo Serra Di Cassano, the home of the scholarly Institute of Philosophical Studies, under whose auspices the conferences are held, include Henry H. Bauer, the professor emeritus of chemistry at Virgina Polytechnic Institute and author of Scientific Literacy and the Myth of Scientific Method (1992), and Science or Pseudoscience: Magnetic Healing, Psychic Phenomena and other Heterodoxies (2001). Bauer is the editor of the Journal of Scientific Exploration.

But the most noteworthy aspect of the remarkable collection of papers already available on the site is the inclusion of nine key titles by Serge Lang, the recently deceased Yale mathematician who was the leading fighter for truth and accuracy in AIDS science after Peter Duesberg of Berkeley, and whose loss has been felt deeply by that movement.

One of the papers is THE PNAS “HIV/AIDS” FILE which details the disgraceful episode this year where Lang’s paper on the sorry state of HIV?AIDS statistics was refused in a curt note by the editor of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, as noted earlier in this blog.

(See Yale’s Serge Lang, a firebrand of idealism, is lost to the academy and to science: ‘Predictably the PNAS Editor in chief, Nick Cozzarelli, after sniffing the political wind, curtly rejected the articles as unsuitable, stating the transparently false excuse that they were “opinion pieces” and not “research articles”, according to “experts on the PNAS board” that he had consulted. The insulting brevity of the letter, and its lack of grace, suggest to us that Nick Cozzarelli was seriously afraid of providing any opportunity whatsoever for Lang to engage him in dialogue:

“Dear Dr Lang:

I have consulted with experts on the PNAS Editorial Board and we cannot accept either of your articles for consideration in the journal. Neither of them are research articles. They are instead opinion pieces.”

Sincerely,

Nick Cozzarelli)

Here is what Strohman wrote to go with Lang’s PNAS submission:

Objections to the orthodox position stem from several types of people, including scientists who bring up contradictions between the orthodox position and empirical data; and journalists, who report existing contradictions from within the establishment and horrible consequences of medical misjudgment. My reading of the exchange between the critics and those representing the orthodoxy is that our establishment people are responding to valid criticism with an unabashed new-speak, a term defined as “language that is ambiguous or dogmatic, and conceals the truth”. Of course, many scientists supporting the orthdox position simply have stopped reading the data, and their newspeak is simply rooted in ignorance. It is essential that the documented challenge to a question of world wide importance be removed from the margins of discourse and be brought to the mainstream. There is no better place to start than with publication in PNAS.

…In my opinion the two papers submitted by Professor Lang constitute an excellent basis for reexamination of the standard theory of what is called “HIV/AIDS”, because they contain substantial and extensive empirical evidence for the failures of this theoretical construct.

The slighting manner in which this opinion was ignored and Lang’s contribution rejected is in our view a classic example of the pygmy stature of those who stand in the way of subjecting HIV?AIDS to rigorous scientific review.

The disrespect shown to two members of the National Academy of Sciences by the editor of their own journal, which traditionally carries such seconded contributions without further review, is surely a sign of how badly the core ideals of their once august society are being corrupted by the newly low standards of scientific discourse epitomised by AIDS scientists in this paradigm dispute, the very standards which are complained about by Lang.

(show)

Istituto Italiano per gli Studi Filosofici, Napoli

Convegno internazionale/International Conference

SCIENZA E DEMOCRAZIA – SCIENCE AND DEMOCRACY

Napoli, 20-22 ottobre 2005

Comitato promotore/Promoting Committee

S. Dumontet, A. Gargano, M. Mamone Capria

Segreteria/Secretariat:

M. Mamone Capria, Dipartimento di Matematica – Università – 06123 Perugia

Tel.: 39.75.5855006 – Fax: 39.75.5855024 – E-mail: mamone@dipmat.unipg.it

Sito del convegno/Web Site: http://www.dipmat.unipg.it/~mamone/sci-dem

Orario delle relazioni

I giornata (giovedì 20 ottobre)

MATTINO/MORNING

9.30-10: Apertura del convegno/Opening of the Conference

10-10.45: J. Barretto Bastos Filho, “Dirimere conflitti e il complesso problema del relativismo culturale”

10.45-11: Discussione

11-11.45: M. Mamone Capria, “Sintesi dei contributi inviati/ An Outline of the Written Contributions”

11.45-12: Discussione

12-12.45: A. Giuliani, “Il prodotto degli scienziati”

12.45-13: Discussione

13-13.30: Discussione generale

POMERIGGIO/AFTERNOON

15.30-16.15: M. Mamone Capria, “Serge Lang’s last file and the suppression of dissent in contemporary science”

16.15-16.30: Discussione

16.30-17.15: M. Walker, “Brave New World of zero risk: covert strategy in British science policy”

17.15-17.30: Discussione

17.30-18.15: M. Tibon-Cornillot, “Déferlement des techniques contemporaines: instabilité et disparition des sociétés industrielles”

18.15-18.30: Discussione

18.30-19.15: A. Baracca. “Cuba, caso unico di sviluppo di un sistema scientifico in un paese sottosviluppato”

19.15-19.30: Discussione

II giornata (venerdì 21 ottobre)

MATTINO/MORNING

9.30-10.15: M. C. Danhoni Neves, “Transgenici alla brasiliana, o come la Monsanto e l’industria del transgenico colonizzò l’agricoltura brasiliana”

10.15-10.30: Discussione

10.30-11.15: J-P Berlan, “Science, democracy and property rights on life”

11.15-11.30: Discussione

11.30-12.15: P. Mwale, “Public debates and societal deliberations: the case of the Zambian national consultation on GM maize food aid in 2002”

12.15-12.30: Discussione

12.30-13: Discussione generale

POMERIGGIO/AFTERNOON

15.30-16: L. Margottini, “Farmaci, ricerca, industria: quale tutela per il cittadino?”

16-16.10: Discussione

16.10-16.55: P. Doshi, “Sound science? Consistent messages?”

16.55-17.10: Discussione

17.10-17.40: P. Capitanucci, “Medicina dotta e medicina popolare agli albori della scienza”

17.40-17.50: Discussione

17.50-18.35: M. Walker, “The ghost lobby and other mysteries of modern medicine. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals and New Labour”

18.35-18.50: Discussione

18.50-19.20: Giovanna Silvestri, “I disturbi dello spettro autistico: il dibattito sulle cause”

19.20-19.30: Discussione

III giornata (sabato 22 ottobre)

MATTINO/MORNING

9.30-10.15: R. Germano, “Moti ionici ‘impossibili’, ovvero sugli effetti biologici dei campi elettromagnetici”

10-10.10: Discussione

10.10-10.40: Testimonianza di un comitato cittadino sull’elettrosmog

10.40-10.50: Discussione

10.50-11.35: M. C. Danhoni Neves, “The enigma of Sobral: Einstein’s later annus mirabilis in Brasil”.

11.35-11.50: Discussione

11.50-12.35: A. Baracca, “Fisica fondamentale, ricerca e realizzazione di nuove armi nucleari”

12.35-12.50: Discussione

12.50-13.30: Discussione generale e chiusura del convegno

One Response to “Naples conference speakers find merit in scientific heresies”

  1. Robert Houston Says:

    Those who might have missed this conference in Naples may be interested in knowing that Dr. Henry Bauer, who is mentioned above as a participant, has released a trio of papers on why HIV is not the cause of AIDS. At least one of these is scheduled to appear in the December issue of the Journal of Scientific Exploration. Preprints are available on line at: hivnotaids.homestead.com.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Bad Behavior has blocked 1246 access attempts in the last 7 days.