Comments on: Nobelist against HIV enters court drama http://www.scienceguardian.com/blog/nobelist-against-hiv-enters-court-drama.htm Reviewing scientific paradigms and other general beliefs in the light of the scientific amd professional literature Sun, 29 Aug 2010 06:03:45 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Michael http://www.scienceguardian.com/blog/nobelist-against-hiv-enters-court-drama.htm/comment-page-1#comment-4339 Michael Sat, 03 Mar 2007 22:03:16 +0000 http://www.paradigmoverthrow.com/blog/nobelist-against-hiv-enters-court-drama.htm#comment-4339 The interesting thing to me, judging by the words of the affected HIV positives in the street, is that many of them are now questioning HIV and whether or not it is the cause of AIDS. In the last two days alone, two people who know of my own dissident position, shared with me that friends of theirs, who they least expected, surprisingly and unexpectedly voiced to them doubts that their HIV positive status means anything at all. <br /> <br /> This is really quite remarkable to me, in that it shows that the word in the street and in discussions among the HIV diagnosed, is rapidly turning to one of serious doubt. <br /> <br /> I do not attribute this to the present court case in Australia, which will inevitably further the public doubt as it dribbles and drabbles into the dialogues of the masses. <br /> <br /> I do attribute it to word of mouth, and person to person discussions among the masses. <br /> <br /> The dissident issue is obviously getting louder and louder, and the inertia of it is really quite remarkable. <br /> <br /> Look at the web discussions on this which were unheard of even two and three years ago; YBYL, Lew Rockwell, Tara's, Hanks, NAR, Dean Esmay, Discussions on AOL and Microsoft Network, AIDS WIKI, and many other blog and discussion groups. <br /> <br /> Look at the media of Harpers and the ICC Guinea Pig Orphan reportage and LA City Beat, and the piece that featured Noreen. <br /> <br /> Look at all of the media reports and books that have come out exposing the lack of integrity at the NIH, FDA, Pharma companies, science, medicine, and research. <br /> <br /> The issue is very much seeping, if not sweeping, into the public consciousness, and this is where the real power to make or break a paradigm lies; with the very same masses who were caught up in the former terror and panic of HIV/AIDS. <br /> <br /> Our global society stands on the edge of a big jump into a bright new world in which the lack of integrity in our government, corporations, and public institutions and religions will not be tolerated. <br /> <br /> Once a point of anger has been reached, it will propel all of the global society into an all out drive for a purification of business, science/medicine, government, religion, and we will all be propelled by this purification to seek a better way for all of us to live. <br /> <br /> This bodes well for all of our futures, and the future of all of mankind. The interesting thing to me, judging by the words of the affected HIV positives in the street, is that many of them are now questioning HIV and whether or not it is the cause of AIDS. In the last two days alone, two people who know of my own dissident position, shared with me that friends of theirs, who they least expected, surprisingly and unexpectedly voiced to them doubts that their HIV positive status means anything at all.

This is really quite remarkable to me, in that it shows that the word in the street and in discussions among the HIV diagnosed, is rapidly turning to one of serious doubt.

I do not attribute this to the present court case in Australia, which will inevitably further the public doubt as it dribbles and drabbles into the dialogues of the masses.

I do attribute it to word of mouth, and person to person discussions among the masses.

The dissident issue is obviously getting louder and louder, and the inertia of it is really quite remarkable.

Look at the web discussions on this which were unheard of even two and three years ago; YBYL, Lew Rockwell, Tara’s, Hanks, NAR, Dean Esmay, Discussions on AOL and Microsoft Network, AIDS WIKI, and many other blog and discussion groups.

Look at the media of Harpers and the ICC Guinea Pig Orphan reportage and LA City Beat, and the piece that featured Noreen.

Look at all of the media reports and books that have come out exposing the lack of integrity at the NIH, FDA, Pharma companies, science, medicine, and research.

The issue is very much seeping, if not sweeping, into the public consciousness, and this is where the real power to make or break a paradigm lies; with the very same masses who were caught up in the former terror and panic of HIV/AIDS.

Our global society stands on the edge of a big jump into a bright new world in which the lack of integrity in our government, corporations, and public institutions and religions will not be tolerated.

Once a point of anger has been reached, it will propel all of the global society into an all out drive for a purification of business, science/medicine, government, religion, and we will all be propelled by this purification to seek a better way for all of us to live.

This bodes well for all of our futures, and the future of all of mankind.

]]> By: Dave http://www.scienceguardian.com/blog/nobelist-against-hiv-enters-court-drama.htm/comment-page-1#comment-4338 Dave Sat, 03 Mar 2007 18:32:25 +0000 http://www.paradigmoverthrow.com/blog/nobelist-against-hiv-enters-court-drama.htm#comment-4338 Also, you have to remember that it takes <i>years</i> of judical activism to undo a fraudulent paradigm. <br /> <br />In the civil rights arena, everybody knows <i>Brown v. Bd. of Education</i> (circa 1954), but few people remember all the lower court cases (and losses) incurred by the NAACP in the 2 decades prior. <br /> <br />Ditto with Tobacco litigation: If I remember correctly, it wasn't until early 1990's before a tobacco company had <i>ever</i> lost a case -- and then the dam broke and billions of $$ were transferred from Big Tobacco to Plaintiff's attorneys and gov'ts. Also, you have to remember that it takes years of judical activism to undo a fraudulent paradigm.

In the civil rights arena, everybody knows Brown v. Bd. of Education (circa 1954), but few people remember all the lower court cases (and losses) incurred by the NAACP in the 2 decades prior.

Ditto with Tobacco litigation: If I remember correctly, it wasn’t until early 1990’s before a tobacco company had ever lost a case — and then the dam broke and billions of $$ were transferred from Big Tobacco to Plaintiff’s attorneys and gov’ts.

]]> By: Truthseeker http://www.scienceguardian.com/blog/nobelist-against-hiv-enters-court-drama.htm/comment-page-1#comment-4337 Truthseeker Sat, 03 Mar 2007 12:30:42 +0000 http://www.paradigmoverthrow.com/blog/nobelist-against-hiv-enters-court-drama.htm#comment-4337 Emails sent to more than one person are public not private, MacD, as any libel lawyer will tell you, and the policy at NAR is to publish all contributions to the public discussion if they rise to the level of genius, demented or not. We edit out envious insults, that is all. Emails sent to more than one person are public not private, MacD, as any libel lawyer will tell you, and the policy at NAR is to publish all contributions to the public discussion if they rise to the level of genius, demented or not. We edit out envious insults, that is all.

]]> By: MacDonald http://www.scienceguardian.com/blog/nobelist-against-hiv-enters-court-drama.htm/comment-page-1#comment-4336 MacDonald Sat, 03 Mar 2007 07:05:51 +0000 http://www.paradigmoverthrow.com/blog/nobelist-against-hiv-enters-court-drama.htm#comment-4336 Hmmm... I seem to remember distinctly something about a policy against publishing private mails without express permission... Hmmm… I seem to remember distinctly something about a policy against publishing private mails without express permission…

]]>