Comments on: Potshot at Duesberg http://www.scienceguardian.com/blog/potshot-at-duesberg.htm Reviewing scientific paradigms and other general beliefs in the light of the scientific amd professional literature Tue, 02 Mar 2010 14:19:00 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: MacDonald http://www.scienceguardian.com/blog/potshot-at-duesberg.htm/comment-page-1#comment-4465 MacDonald Fri, 27 Apr 2007 12:23:15 +0000 http://www.paradigmoverthrow.com/blog/potshot-at-duesberg.htm#comment-4465 <i>Orac shows all his true colors with his statement...</i> Not all of them Michael. Orac shows the rest by his summary of Duesberg's HIV/AIDS critique: <i>...the hypothesis that HIV doesn't cause AIDS</i> This is the equivalent to a theologian summarizing Darwin's "The Origin of Species" as 'the book that contradicts the first chapter in the Bible'. Orac shows all his true colors with his statement…

Not all of them Michael. Orac shows the rest by his summary of Duesberg’s HIV/AIDS critique:

…the hypothesis that HIV doesn’t cause AIDS

This is the equivalent to a theologian summarizing Darwin’s “The Origin of Species” as ‘the book that contradicts the first chapter in the Bible’.

]]> By: Michael http://www.scienceguardian.com/blog/potshot-at-duesberg.htm/comment-page-1#comment-4464 Michael Fri, 27 Apr 2007 06:26:39 +0000 http://www.paradigmoverthrow.com/blog/potshot-at-duesberg.htm#comment-4464 Orac shows all his true colors with his statement: "What really irks me about Duesberg with respect to his ideas about cancer is that he may be on to something", Orac shows all his true colors with his statement:

“What really irks me about Duesberg with respect to his ideas about cancer is that he may be on to something”,

]]>