You forgot MacDonald, Lise, Michael, Dr. Knobless, Undergrad Gal/Guy, DT, TRRLL, TS, McK, German Guest, ojukwu, and a few others…maybe, but me and Bialy is different people and me and Hank banned your sorry ass from ever again posting at YBYL because you are a moron, and if left to your own devices would pollute the new online anti-Nature (check its very rapidly rising Alexa please) with the same crap you do NAR.

BTW…the only reason I am taking this opportunity to rub your drunken Irish nose in this is that this morning we published another previously unpublished part of the chronicles of Farber and Fishbein.

It is pretty heavy, even if me and Hank and Bialy, and Duesberg and MOTYR and a few others who saw it in proof do so say.

It can be read HERE with a single click, that I will be recorded by my macros, and at the end of the day I can know exactly how many readers of this page take my really good advice.

Bye till the next time.

O.

You got it and only a wee little bit wrong. The resident genius on this particular post is bialyzebub aka Otis aka George aka Michael David aka Kafka’s Ghost aka Eccles and only who knows what other fake transdimensional non-beings he can invent, all of course in the majic name of bioscience. Just don’t call him Harvey or challenge his molecular credentials. You could of course be filtered out at BarnesWorld along with Bialysebub and Eccles and a few others.

This post as considerd by Kyle speaks to the subject matter re: the found guilty in australia who is trying to appeal a conviction for violating the law regarding sexual transmission of the hiv virus to one of three proported amours. The case of course doesn’t involve the pathogenicity of hiv, only the transmission thereof, presumably. To that regard P Duesberg will be of no help as the perthies refuse to believe that hiv exists. And of course, Bialysebub is merely interested in exploiting new thinker remedies and has proposed masturbatory diarrheatorical comments at Barnes World as in Comments to this thread are closed.

This of course is only a long way to tell Kyle, that he ought not rely on any supportive help from NAR or Bialysebub or Gene Semon who are playing other internet science paper gotcha games.. Even reading Oncogenes will not help Kyles friend. nor will slamming Fauci,or Gallo or Baltimore whomever those might be.

Tis interesting, tis it not that when the rubber meets the road in the clinical settings or in the court rooms, the bialys of the world seemingly disappear behind their papers and computer screens.

So Kyle, let us hope your friend has good attorneys to prove the conviction is without merit and the law unjust.

I take my leave, trrll

So please don’t hijack the thread just yet, ok, trrll.

If you guys don’t want my opinion, you probably should be more careful about invoking my name:

Bialyzebub:

I bet CN or TRRLL can explain it better than the Harvard docs, or Dr. Gallo for that matter. I couldn’t quite follow their explanations, but it all sounded very convincing.