Comments on: Swiss grant rights to plants, so Dr. Gallo, how about humans? http://www.scienceguardian.com/blog/swiss-assert-plant-rights-in-admirable-move.htm Reviewing scientific paradigms and other general beliefs in the light of the scientific amd professional literature Tue, 02 Mar 2010 14:19:00 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Cathyvm http://www.scienceguardian.com/blog/swiss-assert-plant-rights-in-admirable-move.htm/comment-page-2#comment-6369 Cathyvm Sat, 13 Dec 2008 20:43:14 +0000 http://www.scienceguardian.com/blog/swiss-assert-plant-rights-in-admirable-move.htm#comment-6369 JTDS for someone who lives at home “with mommy” I find your derogatory mommy comments a little disturbing. Does “mommy” need to lock her door at night? And well Todd – that there is your problem. Appeal to authority requires you to need somebody with some “letters” after their name. What “letters” anyone might have is not a measure of intelligence or integrity and I suspect most people that live in the real world realise this. I have said before and will say again that I don’t want/need your approval because you have nothing credible or substantive to add to this discussion. My qualifications are irrelevant and certainly none of your business. You might feel the need to constantly brag about your “four degrees” but some of us are not so ego-driven. And neurotic posturing that “Clark Baker stalked you” isn’t fooling anyone Mr Munchausen. While I don’t like being a picky-poo can you please avail yourself of a dictionary and learn how to spell vicious – this is no mere typo because you consistently misspell it. V-I-C-I-O-U-S. I’m surprised that 4 degrees later you still cannot spell such a simple word. The Starfield article is not freely available online but the full citation is below – with you being such an experienced “medical scientist” and all I suppose you are capable of searching your university archives. [1] 1. Starfield, B., Is US health really the best in the world? Jama, 2000. 284(4): p. 483-5. JTDS for someone who lives at home “with mommy” I find your derogatory mommy comments a little disturbing. Does “mommy” need to lock her door at night?
And well Todd – that there is your problem. Appeal to authority requires you to need somebody with some “letters” after their name. What “letters” anyone might have is not a measure of intelligence or integrity and I suspect most people that live in the real world realise this. I have said before and will say again that I don’t want/need your approval because you have nothing credible or substantive to add to this discussion. My qualifications are irrelevant and certainly none of your business. You might feel the need to constantly brag about your “four degrees” but some of us are not so ego-driven. And neurotic posturing that “Clark Baker stalked you” isn’t fooling anyone Mr Munchausen.
While I don’t like being a picky-poo can you please avail yourself of a dictionary and learn how to spell vicious – this is no mere typo because you consistently misspell it. V-I-C-I-O-U-S. I’m surprised that 4 degrees later you still cannot spell such a simple word.
The Starfield article is not freely available online but the full citation is below – with you being such an experienced “medical scientist” and all I suppose you are capable of searching your university archives. [1]

1. Starfield, B., Is US health really the best in the world? Jama, 2000. 284(4): p. 483-5.

]]> By: Truthseeker http://www.scienceguardian.com/blog/swiss-assert-plant-rights-in-admirable-move.htm/comment-page-2#comment-6368 Truthseeker Sat, 13 Dec 2008 15:28:07 +0000 http://www.scienceguardian.com/blog/swiss-assert-plant-rights-in-admirable-move.htm#comment-6368 Well, this lovable troll is Exhibit #1`at the moment of how the ignorant rush to support mainstream authority in what appears to be a reflex allied to the lynch mob, or the crowd that watched Giordano Bruno burn in Campo de' Fiori in Rome in 1600. Presumably their conscience sets in after the initial excitement is over. Well, this lovable troll is Exhibit #1`at the moment of how the ignorant rush to support mainstream authority in what appears to be a reflex allied to the lynch mob, or the crowd that watched Giordano Bruno burn in Campo de’ Fiori in Rome in 1600. Presumably their conscience sets in after the initial excitement is over.

]]> By: pat http://www.scienceguardian.com/blog/swiss-assert-plant-rights-in-admirable-move.htm/comment-page-2#comment-6367 pat Sat, 13 Dec 2008 05:21:10 +0000 http://www.scienceguardian.com/blog/swiss-assert-plant-rights-in-admirable-move.htm#comment-6367 he is all about "believing". His mind is boggled. he is all about “believing”. His mind is boggled.

]]> By: pat http://www.scienceguardian.com/blog/swiss-assert-plant-rights-in-admirable-move.htm/comment-page-2#comment-6366 pat Sat, 13 Dec 2008 05:19:20 +0000 http://www.scienceguardian.com/blog/swiss-assert-plant-rights-in-admirable-move.htm#comment-6366 This is the staggering amount of research Deschlong has made: On his blog you can read about him asking a cyber-blogger to provide him pictures of electron micrographs of HIV because HE does not have the same access to PubMed as us regular mortals. That is quite the caliber. J Todd DeShong said... Thanks, Seth, I will definitely check that out. Also, I looked at one of your books on line and saw you had two pics of HIV. One was a "TEM" and the other an "SEM". Are these Electron Micrographs? The reason I ask is because this is one of the things that denialists claim is lacking in the evidence of HIV. I find that hard to believe, but I do not have complete acceess to PUBMED. Thank you and I hope to hear from you soon, JTD December 12, 2008 6:24 AM This is the staggering amount of research Deschlong has made:

On his blog you can read about him asking a cyber-blogger to provide him pictures of electron micrographs of HIV because HE does not have the same access to PubMed as us regular mortals. That is quite the caliber.

J Todd DeShong said…
Thanks, Seth, I will definitely check that out.
Also, I looked at one of your books on line and saw you had two pics of HIV. One was a “TEM” and the other an “SEM”. Are these Electron Micrographs? The reason I ask is because this is one of the things that denialists claim is lacking in the evidence of HIV. I find that hard to believe, but I do not have complete acceess to PUBMED.
Thank you and I hope to hear from you soon,
JTD

December 12, 2008 6:24 AM

]]>