Science Guardian

Truth, beauty and paradigm power in science and society

I am Nicolaus Copernicus, and I approve of this blog

News, views and reviews measured against professional literature in peer reviewed journals (adjusted for design flaws and bias), well researched books, authoritative encyclopedias (not the bowdlerized Wiki entries on controversial topics) and the investigative reporting and skeptical studies of courageous original thinkers among academics, philosophers, researchers, scholars, authors, filmmakers and journalists.

Supporting the right of exceptional minds to free speech, publication, media coverage and funding against the crowd prejudice, leadership resistance, monetary influences and internal professional politics of the paradigm wars of cancer, HIV(not)AIDS, evolution, global warming, cosmology, particle physics, macroeconomics, information technology, religions and cults, health, medicine, diet and nutrition.

***************************************************

HONOR ROLL OF SCIENTIFIC TRUTHSEEKERS

Halton C. Arp wki/obit/txt/vds/txt/txt/bk/bk, Henry Bauer txt/blg/ blg/bks/bk/txt/bk/vd, John Beard bk, Harvey Bialy bk/bk/txt/txt/rdo/vd, John Bockris bio/txt/ltr/bk, Donald W. Braben, Peter Breggin ste/fb/col/bks, Darin Brown txt/txt/txt/txt/txt/vd, Giordano Bruno bk/bio/bio, Frank R. Buianouckas, Stanislav Burzynski mov, Erwin Chargaff bio/bk/bio/prs, James Chin bk/vd, Nicolaus Copernicus bk, Mark Craddock, Francis Crick vd, Paul Crutzen, Marie Curie, Rebecca Culshaw txt/bk, Roger Cunningham, Charles Darwin txts/bk, Erasmus Darwin txt//bk/txt/hse/bks, Peter Duesberg ste/ste/bk/txt/vd/vd, Freeman Dyson, Albert Einstein, Richard Feynman bio, John Fewster, Rosalind Franklin, Bernard Forscher tx, Galileo Galilei, Walter Gilbert vd, Goethe bio/bk/bio, Nicolas Gonzalez tlk/rec/stetxt/txt, Patricia Goodson txt/bk/bk, Alec Gordon, James Hansen, Etienne de Harven bk/txt/vd, Alfred Hassig intw/txt, Robert G. Houston txt, Steven Jonas vd, Edward Jenner txt, Benjamin Jesty, Adrian Kent vd, Thomas Kuhn, Fred Kummerow, Stefan Lanka txt/txt/vd, Serge Lang, John Lauritsen vd, Paul Lauterbur vd, Mark Leggett, Richard Lindzen, James Lovelock, Andrew Maniotis, Lynn Margulis, Barbara McClintock, Christi Meyer vd, George Miklos, Marco Mamone Capria, Peter Medawar, Luc Montagnier txt/txt/vd, Kary Mullis, Linus Pauling prs/vd/vd, Eric Penrose, Roger Penrose vd, Max Planck, Rainer Plaga, David Rasnick bio/vd/bk, Robert Root-Bernstein vd, Sherwood Rowland, Otto Rossler, Harry Rubin, Marco Ruggiero txt/txt/intw/vd, Bertrand Russell Carl Sagan vd, Erwin Schrodinger, Fred Singer, Barbara Starfield txt, Gordon Stewart txt/txt, Richard Strohman, Thomas Szasz, Nicola Tesla bio/bio, Charles Thomas intw/vd, Frank Tipler, James Watson vd/vd, Alfred Wegener vd, Edward O. Wilson vd.

ACADEMICS, DOCTORS, AUTHORS, FILMMAKERS, REPORTERS AND COMMENTATORS WHO HAVE NOBLY AIDED REVIEW OF THE STATUS QUO

Jad Adams bk, Marci Angell bk/txt/txt/txt, Clark Baker ste/txt/rdo/vd, James Blodgett, Tony Brown vd, Hiram Caton txt/txt/txt/bk/ste, Jonathan Collin ste , Marcus Cohen, David Crowe vd, Margaret Cuomo, Stephen Davis BK/BK,/rdo, Michael Ellner vd, Elizabeth Ely txt/txt/ste, Epicurus, Dean Esmay, Celia Farber bio/txt/txt/txt/vd, Jonathan Fishbein txt/txt/wk, T.C.Fry, Michael Fumento, Max Gerson txt, Charles Geshekter vd, Michael Geiger, Roberto Giraldo, David Healy txt, Bob Herbert, Mike Hersee ste/rdo, Neville Hodgkinson txt /vd, James P. Hogan, Richard Horton bio/vd/vd, Christopher Hitchens, Eric Johnson, Claus Jensen vd, Phillip Johnson, Coleman Jones vds, William Donald Kelley, Ernst T. Krebs Sr txt, Ernst T. Krebs Jr. txt,/bio/txt/txt/ltr, Paul Krugman, Brett Leung MOV/ste/txt/txt/tx+vd/txt, Katie Leishman, Anthony Liversidge blg/intv/intv/txt/txts/txt/intv/txt/vd/vd, Bruce Livesey txt, James W. Loewen, Frank Lusardi, Nathaniel Lehrman vd, Christine Maggiore bk/ste/rec/rdo/vd, Rouben Mamoulian txt/txt/txt/txt/txt/doc/flm/flm, Noreen Martin vd, Robert Maver txt/itw, Eric Merola MOV, Lady Mary Wortley Montagu, Michael Moore bio/MOV/MOV/MOV, Gordon Moran, Ralph Nader bk, Ralph Moss txt/blg/ste/bks, Gary Null /txt/rdo/vd, Dan Olmsted wki, Toby Ord vd, Charles Ortleb bk/txt/bk/intw/flm, Neenyah Ostrom bk, Dennis Overbye, Mehmet Dr Oz vd, Eleni Papadopulos-Eleopulos ste/vd, Maria Papagiannidou bk, Thomas Piketty bk/bk/bk/bk/bk/bk/bk/bk/bk/bk, Robert Pollin txt/vd/bk, Jon Rappoport bio/bk/bk/ste/bk/bk/vd, Janine Roberts bk/bk, Luis Sancho vd, Liam Scheff ste/txt/bk/bk/rdio/vd, John Scythes, Casper Schmidt txt/txt, Joan Shenton vd/vd, Joseph Sonnabend vd, John Stauber, David Steele, Joseph Stiglitz bk/txt, Will Storr rdo Wolfgang Streeck, James P. Tankersley ste, Gary Taubes vd, Mwizenge S. Tembo, John Tierney vd, Michael Tracey, Valendar Turner rec, Jesse Ventura bk, Michael Verney-Elliott bio/vds/vd, Voltaire, Walter Wagner, Andrew Weil vd, David Weinberger bio/bk/blg/blg/BK/bk/pds, Robert Willner bk/txt/txt/vd, Howard Zinn.

*****************************************************
I am Albert Einstein, and I heartily approve of this blog, insofar as it seems to believe both in science and the importance of intellectual imagination, uncompromised by out of date emotions such as the impulse toward conventional religious beliefs, national aggression as a part of patriotism, and so on.   As I once remarked, the further the spiritual evolution of mankind advances, the more certain it seems to me that the path to genuine religiosity does not lie through the fear of life, and the fear of death, and blind faith, but through striving after rational knowledge.   Certainly the application of the impulse toward blind faith in science whereby authority is treated as some kind of church is to be deplored.  As I have also said, the only thing that ever interfered with my learning was my education. I am Freeman Dyson, and I approve of this blog, but would warn the author that life as a heretic is a hard one, since the ignorant and the half informed, let alone those who should know better, will automatically trash their betters who try to enlighten them with independent thinking, as I have found to my sorrow in commenting on "global warming" and its cures.
Many people would die rather than think – in fact, they do so. – Bertrand Russell.

The progress of science is strewn, like an ancient desert trail, with the bleached skeletons of discarded theories which once seemed to possess eternal life. - Arthur Koestler

One should as a rule respect public opinion in so far as is necessary to avoid starvation and to keep out of prison. – Bertrand Russell

Fraud and falsehood only dread examination. Truth invites it. - Samuel Johnson

A sudden bold and unexpected question doth many times surprise a man and lay him open. – Sir Francis Bacon (1561 – 1626)

He who knows only his own side of the case, knows little of that. – John Stuart Mill

Whenever you find that you are on the side of the majority, it is time to reform. – Mark Twain

Although science has led to the generally high living standards that most of the industrialized world enjoys today, the astounding discoveries underpinning them were made by a tiny number of courageous, out-of-step, visionary, determined, and passionate scientists working to their own agenda and radically challenging the status quo. – Donald W. Braben

An old error is always more popular than a new truth. — German Proverb

I am Richard Feynman and I approve of this blog

When even the brightest mind in our world has been trained up from childhood in a superstition of any kind, it will never be possible for that mind, in its maturity, to examine sincerely, dispassionately, and conscientiously any evidence or any circumstance which shall seem to cast a doubt upon the validity of that superstition. I doubt if I could do it myself. – Mark Twain

It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his income depends on his not understanding it. – Upton Sinclair

A clash of doctrines is not a disaster, but an opportunity. - Alfred North Whitehead

Fraud and falsehood only dread examination. Truth invites it. – Samuel Johnson

Man’s mind cannot grasp the causes of events in their completeness, but the desire to find those causes is implanted in man’s soul. And without considering the multiplicity and complexity of the conditions any one of which taken separately may seem to be the cause, he snatches at the first approximation to a cause that seems to him intelligible and says: “This is the cause!” – Leo Tolstoy

The evolution of the world tends to show the absolute importance of the category of the individual apart from the crowd. - Soren Kierkegaard

Who does not know the truth is simply a fool, yet who knows the truth and calls it a lie is a criminal. – Bertold Brecht

How easily the learned give up the evidence of their senses to preserve the coherence of ideas in their imagination. – Adam Smith

Education consists mainly in what we have unlearned. – Mark Twain

The mind likes a strange idea as little as the body likes a strange protein and resists it with similar energy. If we watch ourselves honestly, we shall often find that we have begun to argue against a new idea even before it has been completely stated. – Arthur Koestler

Whenever the human race assembles to a number exceeding four, it cannot stand free speech. – Mark Twain

People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices. - Adam Smith

There isn’t anything so grotesque or so incredible that the average human being can’t believe it. – Mark Twain

He who knows only his own side of the case, knows little of that. – John Stuart Mill

It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere. – Voltaire

People are generally better persuaded by the reasons which they have themselves discovered than by those which have come into the mind of others.- Blaise Pascal.

Illusion is the first of all pleasures. – Voltaire

The applause of a single human being is of great consequence. – Samuel Johnson

(Click for more Unusual Quotations on Science and Human Nature)

Important: This site is best viewed in LARGE FONT, and in Firefox for image title visibility (place cursor on pics to reveal comments) and layout display. Click the title of any post to get only that post and its Comments for printing. All posts guaranteed fact checked according to reference level cited, typically the original journal studies. Full guide to site purpose, layout and how to print posts out is in the lower blue section at the bottom of the home page.
---Admin AL/E/ILMK---

Test everybody – CDC’s answer to AIDS apathy


If it comes, it might have interesting consequences

Test everybody! Find out if you or I are positive! This is the brave idea whose time has come, according to the CDC and one of its admirers, A. David Paltiel, a health policy expert at the Yale University School of Medicine.

“I think it’s an incredible advance. I think it’s courageous on the part of the CDC,” said A. David Paltiel, a health policy expert at the Yale University School of Medicine.

So down the slippery marketing slope we go with the CDC to the bottom at last, which we welcome with two cheers.

One cheer is for the possibility that more than several superrich and savvy guys’ son or daughter is bound to be positive and then he may pay for a wholesale frontal attack on the NIAID media censorship battlement around the paradigm, or at least a court challenge to the HIV testers to produce an isolated virus, as Martin Kessler suggests in Comments.

The other loud cheer is for the possibility that everybody’s mother and grandmother will prove positive too, just as Dr Harvey Bialy, author and incendiary revolutionary leader of the HIV/AIDS insurgents at the top level of the debate, suspects, as we laid out in our earlier post Ask Mama – a typically novel Bialy initiative, which explained why this research should be done forthwith, by anyone heterosexual who is HIV+ – test your mother and your grandmother immediately, for positively dramatic results.

Federal health officials Thursday recommended regular, routine testing for the AIDS virus for all Americans ages 13 to 64, saying an HIV test should be as common as a cholesterol check.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines are aimed at preventing the further spread of the disease and getting needed care for an estimated 250,000 Americans who don’t yet know they have it.

“We simply must improve early diagnosis,” said CDC Director Dr. Julie Gerberding.

Nearly half of new HIV infections are discovered when doctors are trying to diagnose a patient who has already grown sick with an HIV-related illness, CDC officials said.

“By identifying people earlier through a screening program, we’ll allow them to access life-extending therapy, and also through prevention services, learn how to avoid transmitting HIV infection to others,” said Dr. Timothy Mastro, acting director of the CDC’s division of HIV/AIDS prevention…

The recommendation, if fully implemented, could mean testing for to 100 to 200 million Americans, said Ron Spair, chief financial officer of Pennsylvania-based OraSure Technologies, one of three companies that sell rapid-result HIV tests in the United States.

200 million tests at $15 each, that would be $3 billion.

So is CDC Director Dr. Julie Gerberding (pic) planning an exit to some grateful drug company? Such a thought would never come up in responsible circles. But it is the duty of blogs to mention the unmentionable.

PS: For third loud cheer, see Hank Barnes’ Comment below.

For ref here’s the item, first signalled by McKiernan in Comments today: CDC Backs HIV Test for All Between 13-64

(show)

SF Gate Return to regular view

CDC Backs HIV Test for All Between 13-64

– By MIKE STOBBE, AP Medical Writer

Thursday, September 21, 2006

(09-21) 18:20 PDT ATLANTA (AP) —

Federal health officials Thursday recommended regular, routine testing for the AIDS virus for all Americans ages 13 to 64, saying an HIV test should be as common as a cholesterol check.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines are aimed at preventing the further spread of the disease and getting needed care for an estimated 250,000 Americans who don’t yet know they have it.

“We simply must improve early diagnosis,” said CDC Director Dr. Julie Gerberding.

Nearly half of new HIV infections are discovered when doctors are trying to diagnose a patient who has already grown sick with an HIV-related illness, CDC officials said.

“By identifying people earlier through a screening program, we’ll allow them to access life-extending therapy, and also through prevention services, learn how to avoid transmitting HIV infection to others,” said Dr. Timothy Mastro, acting director of the CDC’s division of HIV/AIDS prevention.

Although some groups raised concerns, the announcement was mostly embraced by health policy experts, doctors and patient advocates.

“I think it’s an incredible advance. I think it’s courageous on the part of the CDC,” said A. David Paltiel, a health policy expert at the Yale University School of Medicine.

The recommendations aren’t legally binding, but they influence what doctors do and what health insurance programs cover.

However, some doctors’ groups predict the recommendations will be challenging to implement, requiring more money and time for testing, counseling and revising consent procedures.

Some physicians also question whether there is enough evidence to expand testing beyond high-risk groups, said Dr. Larry Fields, the president of the American Academy of Family Physicians.

“Are doctors going to do it? Probably not,” Fields said.

But the recommendations were endorsed by the American Medical Association, which urged doctors to comply. The CDC said it’s difficult to predict how many doctors will.

Previously, the CDC recommended routine testing for those at high-risk for catching the virus, such as intravenous drug users and gay men, and for hospitals and certain other institutions serving areas where HIV is common. It also recommended testing for all pregnant women.

Under the new guidelines, patients would be tested for the AIDS virus as part of the standard tests they get when they go for urgent or emergency care, or even during a routine physical.

The CDC recommends everyone get tested at least once, but annual testing is urged only for people at high risk.

Consent for the test would be covered in a clinic or hospital’s standard care consent form. Patients would be allowed to decline the testing. The CDC’s guidelines say no one should be tested without their knowledge.

An American Civil Liberties Union official protested the CDC’s idea of dealing with HIV on standard consent forms, and the agency’s de-emphasis of pre-test counseling.

“By eliminating these safeguards, what they’re calling ‘routine testing’ will in practice be mandatory testing,” said Rose Saxe, a staff attorney with the ACLU AIDS Project.

The cost of the new policy is not clear. A standard HIV test can cost between $2.50 and $8, public health experts say.

New rapid tests cost about $15. If an initial result is positive, confirmatory tests can cost another $50 or more. Treatment for HIV can cost more than $10,000 a year.

WellPoint, the Indianapolis company that owns 14 Blue Cross and Blue Shield plans across the country, has not yet taken a position on the CDC guidelines.

It also hasn’t estimated what it will cost to expand HIV testing for its 34 million members, but it traditionally covers tests recommended by the CDC, said WellPoint spokeswoman Shannon Troughton.

The recommendation, if fully implemented, could mean testing for to 100 to 200 million Americans, said Ron Spair, chief financial officer of Pennsylvania-based OraSure Technologies, one of three companies that sell rapid-result HIV tests in the United States.

The other companies are MedMira Inc. and Trinity Biotech. Standard HIV tests are done through both public health labs and private and commercial labs.

“This certainly expands the rapid HIV testing market,” Spair said.

Identifying more HIV patients will place an added burden on public health programs that pay for such care, some of which are facing potential cuts under a proposal before Congress. But more diagnoses may help win bolstered funding, said John Peebles, an assistant branch chief over HIV programs at the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Resources.

“If you don’t know what you need, you can’t make the argument for resources,” Peebles said.

The CDC has been working on the guidelines for about three years, and got input from more than 100 groups, including doctors’ associations and HIV patient support groups.

___

On the Net:

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention:

www.cdc.gov/mmwr

URL: Test everybody

©2006 Associated Press

5 Responses to “Test everybody – CDC’s answer to AIDS apathy”

  1. noreen martin Says:

    Well, this is an idea whose time has come. It certainly will up the Aids stats tremendously. However, maybe this is a good thing as stated above. When homemakers, grandmothers, church goers, and the elite of society turn up positive then maybe there will be some serious discussions about what is going on. I can only hope that this occurs before more innoncent people are placed on toxic drugs.

  2. jspreen Says:

    Mandatory HIV-testing: The ultimate savior of humanity.

    HIV and Aids celebrate their 25th birthday this Year of the Lord, 2006. Which means they’re grown-ups. Yet many people continue to live with them without even knowing they are there. This must be stopped. Can parents continue to ignore their 25 years old child? Of course not.

    Compared to a flu, a bad cough, headaches, diarrhea, a heart attack, etc, etc, which cannot possibly be ignored by the owner, HIV and Aids can be very silent inhabitants of the host, only to be detected through specially designed testing material. Which, in a certain way, is quite natural because, after all, HIV and Aids being constructions of the human mind, they can only be brought into life if you search for them believing very hard they exist.

    Mandatory HIV testing may be, and even more: should be, considered as the ultimate savior of mankind. Please, allow me to explain, sit still and carefully read the following.

    Although not much is known, nor about the real functioning of tests like Western-Blot, Elisa, PCR, and the like, neither about how results should be interpret, it has become clear over the years that drug addicts and poor and hungry people in general make up the overwhelming majority of the world’s HIV hosts. Practice has also taught us that if testing in itself does almost never enable the tester to be sure of the HIV status of the person being tested, subjective judgment of that person by an experienced tester who can tell, by simply looking at somebody’s face, who and what that person stands for, always provides the desired result.
    If we add to that particular practice the fact that immunity-deficiency is very often simply caused by malnutrition and drug abuse, mandatory testing will make it possible (Finally! Thank God, thank Allah, thank Buddha, thank Shiva, thank every God in the book) to separate the poor, the bad and the ugly from the good.

    AZT, ARVs etc. will do the rest, deliver the world from evil and paradise will be ours.

    Ours, that is, if you’re in it. I’ll be in it for sure. Will you? Look at me for some seconds please… hmm… eyes close together… badly shaved… no ironing… I don’t know, sorry…

    Oh, I forget. This will only work if chemo treatment will become mandatory too. Of course.

    js

    http://www.nightsofarmour.com

  3. Dan Says:

    When homemakers, grandmothers, church goers, and the elite of society turn up positive then maybe there will be some serious discussions about what is going on.

    OR…they’ll continue to play the “risk group” game. All those good, chaste, suburban white folks’ tests will be deemed “false positive”. That would keep the current paradigm in place, but they’d be able to pick up all those “risk group” people that aren’t getting “tested” (due to either apathy or fear of being “positive”, because they’re in a “risk group”).

    It sounds like a potentially win-win situation for the AIDS promoters. The good white folk will stay “negative”, and the bad gays, blacks, hispanics and drug abusers who’ve been slipping out of the net for so long will finally be caught.

  4. kevin Says:

    OR…they’ll continue to play the “risk group” game. All those good, chaste, suburban white folks’ tests will be deemed “false positive”. That would keep the current paradigm in place, but they’d be able to pick up all those “risk group” people that aren’t getting “tested” (due to either apathy or fear of being “positive”, because they’re in a “risk group”).

    This is my biggest fear regarding mandatory testing; however, the optimist in me hopes that there are more than a few competent doctors out there who might question the validity of the tests once they see their clinical inaccurracies. Then again, that may be overly optimistic considering my own non-HIV related treatment woes. Doctors will play a huge role if the masses are ever to have access to the truth about HIV/AIDS. Unfortunately, a doctor’s opinion is readily adopted by the majority of his patients since so few people are willing to take responsibility for the own health status. Not to mention, those same people are usually incapable of critical analysis. On the other hand, mandatory HIV testing has the potential to awaken a lot of people the plight of those who have been branded HIV+. It’s certainly more important to an individual when the brand is placed on him. That is the silver lining.

    One can only hope that as the healthcare industry continues to fail to provide clinical respite for the sick, more people will demand a healthcare system that is somewhat freer from the chains of the financial bottom line. I personally believe that we are going to experience so major macro-economic problems in the good ole US of A and in the very near future. As a result, accountability in all facets of our society will emerge.

  5. HankBarnes Says:

    There may be a silver lining here — to show solidarity and support, the first groups to be tested ought to be:

    1. All gov’t officials of the CDC
    2. All gov’t officials of the FDA
    3. All gov’t officials of WHO
    4. All scientists who have rec’d $$ to research AIDS
    5. All AIDS activists, particularly our friends at TAC/TAG
    6. All medical doctors who have prescribed HAART
    7. All the folks at AMFAR

    Once this wave of testing occurs — all results should be made public, including those who choose to take HAART and those who flush the pills down the toilet — then us normal folks can sit back and assess the situation.

    Just a thought,

    Barnes

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Bad Behavior has blocked 1333 access attempts in the last 7 days.