<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Times lets Larry Summers off the hook</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scienceguardian.com/blog/times-confirms-larry-sommers-was-wrongly-abused.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scienceguardian.com/blog/times-confirms-larry-sommers-was-wrongly-abused.htm</link>
	<description>Reviewing scientific paradigms and other general beliefs in the light of the scientific and professional literature</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 05:57:56 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Truthseeker</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceguardian.com/blog/times-confirms-larry-sommers-was-wrongly-abused.htm/comment-page-2#comment-6535</link>
		<dc:creator>Truthseeker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 19:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceguardian.com/blog/times-confirms-larry-sommers-was-wrongly-abused.htm#comment-6535</guid>
		<description>&quot;Rebecca Culshaw exists, just call the math dept at UT-Tyler and they will tell you she no longer has her job. You might even talk to her husband, he still has his job.&quot;

Seth Kalichman, are you not aware that if someone loses their job, as you put it, as a result of being hounded by an ignorant pack of thieves for speaking the truth as she sees it, the actions of these people flout our nation&#039;s Constitution which guarantees free speech, breaks one of the fundamental rules on which any respectable academy is founded, is against a basic principle of good science (that claims must be freely discussed and reviewed) and is ethically abhorrent to all decent people, let alone a crime against the public interest, which demands that scientific claims on which huge public spending is posited must be freely discussed and reviewed, and political and social means of repressing such discussion and protecting such claims from review might be counted criminal and prosecuted in a court of law for misleading the keepers of the public purse and fraudulently obtaining public funding with statements the applicants know are possibly or even probably (in this case certainly) false.

You didn&#039;t know any of this, but boast of such activity?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Rebecca Culshaw exists, just call the math dept at UT-Tyler and they will tell you she no longer has her job. You might even talk to her husband, he still has his job.&#8221;</p>
<p>Seth Kalichman, are you not aware that if someone loses their job, as you put it, as a result of being hounded by an ignorant pack of thieves for speaking the truth as she sees it, the actions of these people flout our nation&#8217;s Constitution which guarantees free speech, breaks one of the fundamental rules on which any respectable academy is founded, is against a basic principle of good science (that claims must be freely discussed and reviewed) and is ethically abhorrent to all decent people, let alone a crime against the public interest, which demands that scientific claims on which huge public spending is posited must be freely discussed and reviewed, and political and social means of repressing such discussion and protecting such claims from review might be counted criminal and prosecuted in a court of law for misleading the keepers of the public purse and fraudulently obtaining public funding with statements the applicants know are possibly or even probably (in this case certainly) false.</p>
<p>You didn&#8217;t know any of this, but boast of such activity?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cathyvm</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceguardian.com/blog/times-confirms-larry-sommers-was-wrongly-abused.htm/comment-page-2#comment-6532</link>
		<dc:creator>Cathyvm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 07:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceguardian.com/blog/times-confirms-larry-sommers-was-wrongly-abused.htm#comment-6532</guid>
		<description>Seth - &quot;dooped&quot;? Did you mean &quot;duped&quot; or &quot;pooped&quot;. No really, you parade yourself as a PhD and you don&#039;t know how to spell what you mean (or is that smelled what you peed?). Whatever, your &quot;does David Crowe exist&quot;, never remotely funny in the first place, is worn so thin a Donald Trump toupe won&#039;t cover it.
Now I&#039;m not officially a &quot;psychologist&quot; Seth but I suspect a bit of OCD behaviour here. Are you washing your hands 100+ times a day? Turning in a circle 3 times before opening a door? Blessing the Virgin Gastronomicus 35 times before placing a morsel in your (well, lets face it, overstuffed) mouth?
Just to confirm my suspicions I called the University of Connecticut and it reinforced my worst fears. Your colleagues said (not even intimated here) that you are a sexual predator the likes of which has never been seen since Dennis Nielsen (or I believe in your neck of the woods it would be more appropriate to mention Jeffrey Dahmer).
Anyhoo, (or is that anyhooped?)
I think Seth you need to get some  help.

Umm, nooooo MacDonald - the clothed pictures are scary enough - can you imagine all that adiposity released? Ugh!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seth &#8211; &#8220;dooped&#8221;? Did you mean &#8220;duped&#8221; or &#8220;pooped&#8221;. No really, you parade yourself as a PhD and you don&#8217;t know how to spell what you mean (or is that smelled what you peed?). Whatever, your &#8220;does David Crowe exist&#8221;, never remotely funny in the first place, is worn so thin a Donald Trump toupe won&#8217;t cover it.<br />
Now I&#8217;m not officially a &#8220;psychologist&#8221; Seth but I suspect a bit of OCD behaviour here. Are you washing your hands 100+ times a day? Turning in a circle 3 times before opening a door? Blessing the Virgin Gastronomicus 35 times before placing a morsel in your (well, lets face it, overstuffed) mouth?<br />
Just to confirm my suspicions I called the University of Connecticut and it reinforced my worst fears. Your colleagues said (not even intimated here) that you are a sexual predator the likes of which has never been seen since Dennis Nielsen (or I believe in your neck of the woods it would be more appropriate to mention Jeffrey Dahmer).<br />
Anyhoo, (or is that anyhooped?)<br />
I think Seth you need to get some  help.</p>
<p>Umm, nooooo MacDonald &#8211; the clothed pictures are scary enough &#8211; can you imagine all that adiposity released? Ugh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MacDonald</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceguardian.com/blog/times-confirms-larry-sommers-was-wrongly-abused.htm/comment-page-2#comment-6531</link>
		<dc:creator>MacDonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 06:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceguardian.com/blog/times-confirms-larry-sommers-was-wrongly-abused.htm#comment-6531</guid>
		<description>Seth, no doubt the joke gets funnier every time you tell it, but let&#039;s face it, you are not going to sell any books regardless. 

If you really want to make us laugh, why don&#039;t you post some nude photos of yourself. I&#039;m sure your wife wouldn&#039;t mind dropping the fig either, since you&#039;re both in the business of prostituting yourselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seth, no doubt the joke gets funnier every time you tell it, but let&#8217;s face it, you are not going to sell any books regardless. </p>
<p>If you really want to make us laugh, why don&#8217;t you post some nude photos of yourself. I&#8217;m sure your wife wouldn&#8217;t mind dropping the fig either, since you&#8217;re both in the business of prostituting yourselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Kalichman</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceguardian.com/blog/times-confirms-larry-sommers-was-wrongly-abused.htm/comment-page-1#comment-6530</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Kalichman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 05:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceguardian.com/blog/times-confirms-larry-sommers-was-wrongly-abused.htm#comment-6530</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comments.
But there is still no proof that David Crowe exists.

Who is his current employer?

What public events has he attended?

Has he published in a peer reviewed outlet that would not allow an imposter to assume an identity? 

Rebecca Culshaw exists, just call the math dept at UT-Tyler and they will tell you she no longer has her job. You might even talk to her husband, he still has his job.

Henry Bauer exists (barely). Call VA-Tech and you can talk to colleagues of his… and man what they have to say about the resident pseudoscience expert!

Who shall we call to verify that David Crowe exists? What University? What Corporation? What business?

Can someone provide proof that David Crowe exists? Why can’t he provide proof himself!! &#039;He&#039; has responded to the call, but offers no proof.

Because &#039;David Crowe&#039; is a central figure in my book Denying AIDS, I now worry that I was dooped into thinking he was real. 

If you can prove that David Crowe exists, visit http://denyingaids.blogspot.com  and see what prizes await you...once you provide the proof.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comments.<br />
But there is still no proof that David Crowe exists.</p>
<p>Who is his current employer?</p>
<p>What public events has he attended?</p>
<p>Has he published in a peer reviewed outlet that would not allow an imposter to assume an identity? </p>
<p>Rebecca Culshaw exists, just call the math dept at UT-Tyler and they will tell you she no longer has her job. You might even talk to her husband, he still has his job.</p>
<p>Henry Bauer exists (barely). Call VA-Tech and you can talk to colleagues of his… and man what they have to say about the resident pseudoscience expert!</p>
<p>Who shall we call to verify that David Crowe exists? What University? What Corporation? What business?</p>
<p>Can someone provide proof that David Crowe exists? Why can’t he provide proof himself!! &#8216;He&#8217; has responded to the call, but offers no proof.</p>
<p>Because &#8216;David Crowe&#8217; is a central figure in my book Denying AIDS, I now worry that I was dooped into thinking he was real. </p>
<p>If you can prove that David Crowe exists, visit <a href="http://denyingaids.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://denyingaids.blogspot.com</a>  and see what prizes await you&#8230;once you provide the proof.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

