Science Guardian

Truth, beauty and paradigm power in science and society

I am Nicolaus Copernicus, and I approve of this blog

News, views and reviews measured against professional literature in peer reviewed journals (adjusted for design flaws and bias), well researched books, authoritative encyclopedias (not the bowdlerized Wiki entries on controversial topics) and the investigative reporting and skeptical studies of courageous original thinkers among academics, philosophers, researchers, scholars, authors, filmmakers and journalists.

Supporting the right of exceptional minds to free speech, publication, media coverage and funding against the crowd prejudice, leadership resistance, monetary influences and internal professional politics of the paradigm wars of cancer, HIV(not)AIDS, evolution, global warming, cosmology, particle physics, macroeconomics, information technology, religions and cults, health, medicine, diet and nutrition.

***************************************************

HONOR ROLL OF SCIENTIFIC TRUTHSEEKERS

Halton C. Arp wki/obit/txt/vds/txt/txt/bk/bk, Henry Bauer txt/blg/ blg/bks/bk/txt/bk/vd, John Beard bk, Harvey Bialy bk/bk/txt/txt/rdo/vd, John Bockris bio/txt/ltr/bk, Donald W. Braben, Peter Breggin ste/fb/col/bks, Darin Brown txt/txt/txt/txt/txt/vd, Giordano Bruno bk/bio/bio, Frank R. Buianouckas, Stanislav Burzynski mov, Erwin Chargaff bio/bk/bio/prs, James Chin bk/vd, Nicolaus Copernicus bk, Mark Craddock, Francis Crick vd, Paul Crutzen, Marie Curie, Rebecca Culshaw txt/bk, Roger Cunningham, Charles Darwin txts/bk, Erasmus Darwin txt//bk/txt/hse/bks, Peter Duesberg ste/ste/bk/txt/vd/vd, Freeman Dyson, Albert Einstein, Richard Feynman bio, John Fewster, Rosalind Franklin, Bernard Forscher tx, Galileo Galilei, Walter Gilbert vd, Goethe bio/bk/bio, Nicolas Gonzalez tlk/rec/stetxt/txt, Patricia Goodson txt/bk/bk, Alec Gordon, James Hansen, Etienne de Harven bk/txt/vd, Alfred Hassig intw/txt, Robert G. Houston txt, Steven Jonas vd, Edward Jenner txt, Benjamin Jesty, Adrian Kent vd, Thomas Kuhn, Fred Kummerow, Stefan Lanka txt/txt/vd, Serge Lang, John Lauritsen vd, Paul Lauterbur vd, Mark Leggett, Richard Lindzen, James Lovelock, Andrew Maniotis, Lynn Margulis, Barbara McClintock, Christi Meyer vd, George Miklos, Marco Mamone Capria, Peter Medawar, Luc Montagnier txt/txt/vd, Kary Mullis, Linus Pauling prs/vd/vd, Eric Penrose, Roger Penrose vd, Max Planck, Rainer Plaga, David Rasnick bio/vd/bk, Robert Root-Bernstein vd, Sherwood Rowland, Otto Rossler, Harry Rubin, Marco Ruggiero txt/txt/intw/vd, Bertrand Russell Carl Sagan vd, Erwin Schrodinger, Fred Singer, Barbara Starfield txt, Gordon Stewart txt/txt, Richard Strohman, Thomas Szasz, Nicola Tesla bio/bio, Charles Thomas intw/vd, Frank Tipler, James Watson vd/vd, Alfred Wegener vd, Edward O. Wilson vd.

ACADEMICS, DOCTORS, AUTHORS, FILMMAKERS, REPORTERS AND COMMENTATORS WHO HAVE NOBLY AIDED REVIEW OF THE STATUS QUO

Jad Adams bk, Marci Angell bk/txt/txt/txt, Clark Baker ste/txt/rdo/vd, James Blodgett, Tony Brown vd, Hiram Caton txt/txt/txt/bk/ste, Jonathan Collin ste , Marcus Cohen, David Crowe vd, Margaret Cuomo, Stephen Davis BK/BK,/rdo, Michael Ellner vd, Elizabeth Ely txt/txt/ste, Epicurus, Dean Esmay, Celia Farber bio/txt/txt/txt/vd, Jonathan Fishbein txt/txt/wk, T.C.Fry, Michael Fumento, Max Gerson txt, Charles Geshekter vd, Michael Geiger, Roberto Giraldo, David Healy txt, Bob Herbert, Mike Hersee ste/rdo, Neville Hodgkinson txt /vd, James P. Hogan, Richard Horton bio/vd/vd, Christopher Hitchens, Eric Johnson, Claus Jensen vd, Phillip Johnson, Coleman Jones vds, William Donald Kelley, Ernst T. Krebs Sr txt, Ernst T. Krebs Jr. txt,/bio/txt/txt/ltr, Paul Krugman, Brett Leung MOV/ste/txt/txt/tx+vd/txt, Katie Leishman, Anthony Liversidge blg/intv/intv/txt/txts/txt/intv/txt/vd/vd, Bruce Livesey txt, James W. Loewen, Frank Lusardi, Nathaniel Lehrman vd, Christine Maggiore bk/ste/rec/rdo/vd, Rouben Mamoulian txt/txt/txt/txt/txt/doc/flm/flm, Noreen Martin vd, Robert Maver txt/itw, Eric Merola MOV, Lady Mary Wortley Montagu, Michael Moore bio/MOV/MOV/MOV, Gordon Moran, Ralph Nader bk, Ralph Moss txt/blg/ste/bks, Gary Null /txt/rdo/vd, Dan Olmsted wki, Toby Ord vd, Charles Ortleb bk/txt/bk/intw/flm, Neenyah Ostrom bk, Dennis Overbye, Mehmet Dr Oz vd, Eleni Papadopulos-Eleopulos ste/vd, Maria Papagiannidou bk, Thomas Piketty bk/bk/bk/bk/bk/bk/bk/bk/bk/bk, Robert Pollin txt/vd/bk, Jon Rappoport bio/bk/bk/ste/bk/bk/vd, Janine Roberts bk/bk, Luis Sancho vd, Liam Scheff ste/txt/bk/bk/rdio/vd, John Scythes, Casper Schmidt txt/txt, Joan Shenton vd/vd, Joseph Sonnabend vd, John Stauber, David Steele, Joseph Stiglitz bk/txt, Will Storr rdo Wolfgang Streeck, James P. Tankersley ste, Gary Taubes vd, Mwizenge S. Tembo, John Tierney vd, Michael Tracey, Valendar Turner rec, Jesse Ventura bk, Michael Verney-Elliott bio/vds/vd, Voltaire, Walter Wagner, Andrew Weil vd, David Weinberger bio/bk/blg/blg/BK/bk/pds, Robert Willner bk/txt/txt/vd, Howard Zinn.

*****************************************************
I am Albert Einstein, and I heartily approve of this blog, insofar as it seems to believe both in science and the importance of intellectual imagination, uncompromised by out of date emotions such as the impulse toward conventional religious beliefs, national aggression as a part of patriotism, and so on.   As I once remarked, the further the spiritual evolution of mankind advances, the more certain it seems to me that the path to genuine religiosity does not lie through the fear of life, and the fear of death, and blind faith, but through striving after rational knowledge.   Certainly the application of the impulse toward blind faith in science whereby authority is treated as some kind of church is to be deplored.  As I have also said, the only thing that ever interfered with my learning was my education. I am Freeman Dyson, and I approve of this blog, but would warn the author that life as a heretic is a hard one, since the ignorant and the half informed, let alone those who should know better, will automatically trash their betters who try to enlighten them with independent thinking, as I have found to my sorrow in commenting on "global warming" and its cures.
Many people would die rather than think – in fact, they do so. – Bertrand Russell.

The progress of science is strewn, like an ancient desert trail, with the bleached skeletons of discarded theories which once seemed to possess eternal life. - Arthur Koestler

One should as a rule respect public opinion in so far as is necessary to avoid starvation and to keep out of prison. – Bertrand Russell

Fraud and falsehood only dread examination. Truth invites it. - Samuel Johnson

A sudden bold and unexpected question doth many times surprise a man and lay him open. – Sir Francis Bacon (1561 – 1626)

He who knows only his own side of the case, knows little of that. – John Stuart Mill

Whenever you find that you are on the side of the majority, it is time to reform. – Mark Twain

Although science has led to the generally high living standards that most of the industrialized world enjoys today, the astounding discoveries underpinning them were made by a tiny number of courageous, out-of-step, visionary, determined, and passionate scientists working to their own agenda and radically challenging the status quo. – Donald W. Braben

An old error is always more popular than a new truth. — German Proverb

I am Richard Feynman and I approve of this blog

When even the brightest mind in our world has been trained up from childhood in a superstition of any kind, it will never be possible for that mind, in its maturity, to examine sincerely, dispassionately, and conscientiously any evidence or any circumstance which shall seem to cast a doubt upon the validity of that superstition. I doubt if I could do it myself. – Mark Twain

It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his income depends on his not understanding it. – Upton Sinclair

A clash of doctrines is not a disaster, but an opportunity. - Alfred North Whitehead

Fraud and falsehood only dread examination. Truth invites it. – Samuel Johnson

Man’s mind cannot grasp the causes of events in their completeness, but the desire to find those causes is implanted in man’s soul. And without considering the multiplicity and complexity of the conditions any one of which taken separately may seem to be the cause, he snatches at the first approximation to a cause that seems to him intelligible and says: “This is the cause!” – Leo Tolstoy

The evolution of the world tends to show the absolute importance of the category of the individual apart from the crowd. - Soren Kierkegaard

Who does not know the truth is simply a fool, yet who knows the truth and calls it a lie is a criminal. – Bertold Brecht

How easily the learned give up the evidence of their senses to preserve the coherence of ideas in their imagination. – Adam Smith

Education consists mainly in what we have unlearned. – Mark Twain

The mind likes a strange idea as little as the body likes a strange protein and resists it with similar energy. If we watch ourselves honestly, we shall often find that we have begun to argue against a new idea even before it has been completely stated. – Arthur Koestler

Whenever the human race assembles to a number exceeding four, it cannot stand free speech. – Mark Twain

People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices. - Adam Smith

There isn’t anything so grotesque or so incredible that the average human being can’t believe it. – Mark Twain

He who knows only his own side of the case, knows little of that. – John Stuart Mill

It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere. – Voltaire

People are generally better persuaded by the reasons which they have themselves discovered than by those which have come into the mind of others.- Blaise Pascal.

Illusion is the first of all pleasures. – Voltaire

The applause of a single human being is of great consequence. – Samuel Johnson

(Click for more Unusual Quotations on Science and Human Nature)

Important: This site is best viewed in LARGE FONT, and in Firefox for image title visibility (place cursor on pics to reveal comments) and layout display. Click the title of any post to get only that post and its Comments for printing. All posts guaranteed fact checked according to reference level cited, typically the original journal studies. Full guide to site purpose, layout and how to print posts out is in the lower blue section at the bottom of the home page.
---Admin AL/E/ILMK---

Winston Churchill encourages heretics in AIDS, but probably to no avail

Winston Churchill once spoke some words which may encourage those who soldier on after nearly two decades in their uphill battle to open up the HIV?AIDS debate.

“Laws, just or unjust, may govern men’s actions. Tyrannies may restrain or regulate their words. The machinery for propaganda may pack their minds with falsehood. … But the soul of man thus held in trance or frozen in a long night can be awakened by a spark coming from God knows where.”

The AIDS dissidents certainly need some encouragement, we have to say, given that each time they seem to score a watershed victory in publishing powerful antiparadigm material, which they quite reasonably expect finally to blow the lid off mainstream concealment and dismissal of the debate, absolutely nothing happens.

The shocking initial paper by Peter Duesberg in Cancer Research in 1986, partly considering and rejecting the new HIV=AIDS hypothesis, caused a stir in scientific and political circles for a few months, including provoking a famous internal NIH memo in Washington asking why no one had “flagged” it before publication (ie got to the editor of Cancer Research first to head off publication). Indeed thanks to the proposal of Harvey Bialy, then scientific editor of Nature/Biotechnology, it nearly sparked a shoot out at the White House between mainstream HIV supporters and the reviewers, until this was scotched by the refusal of mainstream NIH scientists to participate. After that, the article stayed under the carpet where it was swept.

The subsequent 10 page, 200-footnote broadside by Peter Duesberg in the Proceedings of the National Academy in Febnruary 1989 was definitive in its evisceration of the purported grounds for believing HIV could cause any medical problem at all for humans, let alone defeat the immune system. Sent a copy before publication, Robert Gallo, the champion of the theory it trashed, promised a response, and even the editors of the Proceedings, a rather staid house organ for the most exclusive club in science which sits firmly at the pinnacle of science publishing, were excited at the prospect of the waves they were about to generate.

The result was an extraordinary disappointment for all but the most practiced cynic. There was effectively no reply. Officially there was pure, distilled public silence from Gallo and the other generals of HIV. Not only was there absolutely no reply paper as promised in the Proceedings, but very little media coverage, and no political wave of any significance, certainly not the tidal wave that had been confidently expected by the editors of the Proceedings and others who knew what was coming.

In a story to be repeated many times over two decades, the paradigm sailed on unperturbed, an airship beyond the reach of artillery fire which would have easily brought it down if it had come within range.

The fizzle so far of Harvey Bialy’s brilliant book, “Oncogenes, Aneuploidy and AIDS: A Scientific Life and Times of Peter H. Duesberg”(North Atlantic Books, 2004) is a prime example of how a book which would explode HIV?AIDS thinking in all its complacent illogic if anybody politically influential would bother to read it gets absolutely nowhere simply because it is ignored. In that case, hope still flickers because it is proving an underground sleeper which is being read with interest by key figures in science, and has garnered so far a handful of extremely laudatory reviews.

And this silent treatment has been the experience of dissidents since. There have been fifteen or more books, and a handful of searing papers which have been fired like large rockets at the great AIDS theory Hindenberg, which as far as the dissidents are concerned is full of nothing but highly inflammable gas which would instantly detonate in a gigantic, globe-rending disintegration if permitted to come into range of logic and the demand for genuine evidence.

And we have to agree with them that this is the key reason why AIDS science evades criticism. It is not so much the repression of debate as the utter evasion of it through ignoring it and denying it any respect whatsoever. The extraordinary extended life of the AIDS paradigm seems to have been achieved politically by the simple expedient of staying out of range of missiles,

One thing is certain. No proper scientific reply on the same level has ever been achieved by any of these attacks on the standard theory of AIDS, as can easily be seen by the fact that no one has ever attempted a reply in the Proceedings to the Proceedings paper, and when Walter Gilbert used the paper as an impeccable example of paradigm challenge in teaching his graduate students at Harvard, not one of them was able to make a name for himself by writing a rebuttal.

Politically speaking however the most effective reply to any attack on AIDS science has been to ignore it. It is the qualifications and sanity of the critic which are called into question, rather than the arguments answered. The right of the questioner to respect and consideration is rejected. No respect is granted. Thus there is no need to answer his or her arguments.

And this we predict will be the political strategy of responding to any future critique, however strong, and on the basis of what has happened over two decades we suspect it will be always effective.

We say this even though we happen to know that a particularly brilliant journalistic critique of the egregious situation in AIDS science is in the pipeline, and is good enough and politically persuasive enough that in a sane world it would cause the political facade of AIDS science to crack and fall apart.

But we sadly predict that this critique, while it will probably trigger some secondary press coverage and debate, will have no more effect in the end on the AIDS juggernaut than a boulder on the shore would have in stopping a tsunami.

For twelve years ago, in 1993, the same thing happened in Britain with the publication of a major series of articles in the Sunday Times, laying out the ideas of Duesberg on AIDS and showing how experience and discussion in England and in Africa bore them out. The series, written by Neville Hodgkinson, the science correspondent, was persuasive enough to infuriate the editor of Nature, who editorialized against it and announced that his readers need not buy their own copies of the Sunday Times but that he, John Maddox, would let them know of anything it printed which was worth reading,

The outcome was that absolutely nothing changed except that in the end Hodgkinson and his editor lost their jobs, and his own son we hear still does not believe Hodgkinson, who subsequently wrote a book in 1996,’AIDS; The Failure of Contemporary Science’ (Fourth Estate, London UK 1996, 420 pages, ISBN 1-85702-337-4). (See here for Neville Hodgkinson’s excellent reporting on AIDS

Of course the UK is not the US but in AIDS the pattern of scientific debate has been much the same, with Nature playing the role of Science. There are two things, however, which may make a difference this time around, perhaps all the difference in the world.

One, of course, is the existence of the World Wide Web, and its blogs.

The second is that the Fishbein allegations of grossly improper behavior at the NIH in rewriting the conclusions of research reports in AIDS seem to be too well evidenced to be easily swept under the carpet, and these are news stories in their own right as well as calling into question the ethics and credibility of the minds who run AIDS science politics.

This material will be spotlighted to damning effect in the upcoming article.

One Response to “Winston Churchill encourages heretics in AIDS, but probably to no avail”

  1. Truthseeker Says:

    Another quote from Churchill:

    “Man will occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of the time he will pick himself up and continue.”

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Bad Behavior has blocked 1328 access attempts in the last 7 days.